Comments on: Political Quiz http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2004/08/07/political_quiz.html News and Nattering ... What will the children think? Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:16:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: ***Dave http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2004/08/07/political_quiz.html/comment-page-1#comment-12551 ***Dave Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:34:47 +0000 http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/wp/2004/08/07/political-quiz.html#comment-12551 <p>Well, I certainly wasn't endorsing Ms Malkin's ideas by any means. All you need to know is that she answered <em>all </em>of the above with "yes." </p> <p>I think there's some value in an (unscientific) survey of press opinions, and I'd be nearly as irked by an all-No tally as an all-Yes one.</p> Well, I certainly wasn’t endorsing Ms Malkin’s ideas by any means. All you need to know is that she answered all of the above with “yes.”

I think there’s some value in an (unscientific) survey of press opinions, and I’d be nearly as irked by an all-No tally as an all-Yes one.

]]> By: Randy T http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2004/08/07/political_quiz.html/comment-page-1#comment-12550 Randy T Sun, 08 Aug 2004 08:56:44 +0000 http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/wp/2004/08/07/political-quiz.html#comment-12550 <p>Ah, yes. Michelle.</p> <p>I looked at some of her columns. </p> <p>Both 'metrosexuals' and the brutish louts featured on the Man Show are "the rotten fruit that feminism has produced". I could have sworn that both fops and brutes were mentioned in pre-20th C history and literature but maybe they, too were the fault of feminists. So insidious is the feminist rot that it <em>radiates backwards in time</em>. </p> <p><br /> She likes chivalry, "From the knights of the Arthurian legend to the Southern confederation of decent fellows in 19th century America, Miner pays homage to gentlemen of the past who embraced and embodied the ennobling qualities of warrior, monk and lover."</p> <p>Butchering (and crucifying) serfs who tried to take a stab at freedom, casual rape, women as chattels, slavery, the Klan... "Monk <em>and</em> lover"? Well, ah, she's strongly anti-gay-marriage, so it looks like she thinks the answer is to put 'em in <em>gay monastaries</em>. Now that's thinking outside the box!</p> Ah, yes. Michelle.

I looked at some of her columns.

Both ‘metrosexuals’ and the brutish louts featured on the Man Show are “the rotten fruit that feminism has produced”. I could have sworn that both fops and brutes were mentioned in pre-20th C history and literature but maybe they, too were the fault of feminists. So insidious is the feminist rot that it radiates backwards in time.

She likes chivalry, “From the knights of the Arthurian legend to the Southern confederation of decent fellows in 19th century America, Miner pays homage to gentlemen of the past who embraced and embodied the ennobling qualities of warrior, monk and lover.”

Butchering (and crucifying) serfs who tried to take a stab at freedom, casual rape, women as chattels, slavery, the Klan… “Monk and lover”? Well, ah, she’s strongly anti-gay-marriage, so it looks like she thinks the answer is to put ‘em in gay monastaries. Now that’s thinking outside the box!

]]>