https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

I like to think I’m not racist, but …

… well, evidently, I am. At least, according to the “racism” guidelines of the Seattle public schools. Cultural Racism: Those aspects of society that overtly and covertly attribute value and…

… well, evidently, I am. At least, according to the “racism” guidelines of the Seattle public schools.

Cultural Racism:
Those aspects of society that overtly and covertly attribute value and normality to white people and Whiteness, and devalue, stereotype, and label people of color as “other”, different, less than, or render them invisible. Examples of these norms include defining white skin tones as nude or flesh colored, having a future time orientation, emphasizing individualism as opposed to a more collective ideology, defining one form of English as standard, and identifying only Whites as great writers or composers.

I remember having a Crayola crayon that was “flesh” colored. Yes, it was kind of Anglo pink. I can see where some folks might ahve felt left out.

I’m not sure what “having a future time orientation” means. I’m a sci-fi fan — does that count?

I’m a believer in individualism, vs. a “collective ideology.” Apparently that makes me a cultural racist.

And I’m a believer in orthography and standard pronounciation of English. I guess that makes me a cultural racist, too.

I don’t pay a lot of attention to the race of writers and composers. I know what I like, though. I suspect that makes me racist, too.

Institutional Racism:
The network of institutional structures, policies, and practices that create advantages and benefits for Whites, and discrimination, oppression, and disadvantages for people from targeted racial groups. The advantages created for Whites are often invisible to them, or are considered “rights” available to everyone as opposed to “privileges” awarded to only some individuals and groups.

Apparently it’s possible to be racist without being aware of it. I suspect the opposite is also believed to be true, i.e., that if you are not aware of being racist, you probably are.

Race
A pseudobiological category that distinguishes people based on physical characteristics (e.g., skin color, body shape/size, facial features, hair texture). People of one race can vary in terms of ethnicity and culture.

Ethnicity
A group whose members share a common history and origin, as well as commonalities in terms of factors such as nationality, religion, and cultural activities.

Culture
The way of life of a group of people including the shared values, beliefs, behaviors, family roles, social relationships, verbal and nonverbal communication styles, orientation to authority, as well as preferences and expressions (art, music, food). “What everybody knows that everybody else knows.”

I gather that racism is a pseudo-scientifically bogus belief system. Ethnicism and culturalism, though, sound like they are good, positive things.

Acculturation
A dynamic process that occurs when members of one culture (culture of origin) come into contact with another culture (host/dominant culture) over a long period of time. The process involves exposure to, reaction to, and possible adoptions of aspects of the other groups culture. Adapting to the characteristics of the larger or dominant culture, while retaining some of one’s unique cultural traits.

Assimilation
The process of giving up connections to and aspects of one’s culture of origin and blending in with the host/dominant culture. Also, the wholesale adoption of the dominant culture at the expense of the original culture.

Acculturation = Good.
Assimilation = Bad.
Got it.

Equality
“In any given circumstances, people who are the same in those respects relevant to how they are treated in those circumstances should receive the same treatment” (p. 45). Equality defined in this way, looks at the individual and the circumstances surrounding him or her. It does not focus on group differences based on categories such as race, sex, social class, and ethnicity. This view is one of assimilation because it assumes that individuals, once socialized into society, have the right “to do anything they want, to choose their own lives and not be hampered by traditional expectations and stereotypes” (Young, 1990, p. 157).

Equity
“…. deals with difference and takes into consideration the fact that this society has many groups in it who have not always been given equal treatment and/or have not had a level field on which to play. These groups have been frequently made to feel inferior to those in the mainstream and some have been oppressed. To achieve equity, according to Young (1990), “Social policy should sometimes accord special treatment to groups” (p. 158). Thus, the concept of equity provides a case for unequal treatment for those who have been disadvantaged over time. It can provide compensatory kinds of treatment, offering it in the form of special programs and benefits for those who have been discriminated against and are in need of opportunity.”

Equality = Assimilation and Individualism = Bad
Equity = Inequality = Good.
Got it.

Prejudice
An attitude or opinion that is held in the absence of (or despite) full information. Typically it is negative in nature and based on faulty, distorted or unsubstantiated information that is over generalized and relatively in-flexible. Prejudices can be conscious or relatively unconscious.

Whew! Prejudice = Bad. That one, I think I got. Holding opinions based in over-generalized and inflexible and unsubstantiated information is prejudice. Yikes. Sounds nasty.

Anyway, my apologies to everyone I’ve offended with my future-thinking, individualistic, crypto-racism. Clearly I should have gone to school in Seattle, and I’d be well and truly goodthinkful.

Oops. Damn. Just referenced another white, male author. My bad.

(via the Agitator)

210 view(s)  

5 thoughts on “I like to think I’m not racist, but …”

  1. I’m not sure whether “having a future time orientation” means being goal-oriented or just differentiating between the future and the present. There’s been a lot of discussion about the Hopi language — do native Hopi speakers have a different view of time because of their language structure? Maybe, maybe not. Also, being me, I wonder: “Is that where Roddenberry got the name?”

    http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/cultural/language/whorf.html

  2. A Google of the phrase gives a scattergun of citation, not many of which seem to have anything anything in this area. The best seemed to be here, where “future-time orientation” is identified as one of the aspects of “Mainstream American Values,” whereas “present-time orientation” is shown as a “Traditional Native Value” (in the context of Native Americans, it appears). I find a reference in this paper, too:

    Most scholars agree that the transmission of core values is still the primary concern of the educational institutions. Pai and Adler (1997) acknowledge that historically each generation shows generational differences in students’ receptiveness to the core values transmitted through the educational institutions. They suggest that the 1960’s produced the most tumultuous time in American history wherein students challenged the traditional core values of adults. Traditionally the core values in America stressed Puritan morality, work-success ethic, individualism, achievement orientation, and future-time orientation. Students during the 1960’s advocated for core values that stressed sociability, relativistic moral values, consideration of others, hedonistic present-time orientation, and conformity to the group (Spindler 1963:132-47).

    From what I can gather, in bits and pieces, future-time orientation seems to be a focus on how what one does today will “pay off” tomorrow, or how we look ahead to the future (planning, anticipating, sacrificing for, awaiting). (This may tie into some conversations I’ve been in recently that talk about Christianity as a “pie in the sky by-and-by” religion). By assuming that everyone is saving/planning/awaiting/turned toward the future, vs. savoring, enjoying, participating in the present, evidently one is being racist (or, more properly, culturalist).

    (Adding “anthropology” to the Google search seems to have narrowed it down some, but I’ve run out of time to further research.)

  3. Hmmm…

    I guess being raised with these beliefs for the most part, I see no problem with them.

    Acculturalation is better then Assimulation.

    Institutional racism is fairly rampent still, 22 year in the Engineering biz has shown me that much at least. Or, for example DWB.

  4. I guess being raised with these beliefs for the most part, I see no problem with them.

    One of the key indicators of racism.

    Acculturalation is better then Assimulation.

    As defined, I agree. The question becomes, how much of one’s original culture does one expect to retain, how much of the “larger, dominant” culture does one adopt (and how quickly), how much do the cultures mingle and amalgamate, and how much does each culture expect the other to give in.

    Thus, forcing someone to only speak English is an example of unreasonable assimilation. Expecting that all services and institutions will be able to support your language of origin is also probably unreasonable.

    Institutional racism is fairly rampent still, 22 year in the Engineering biz has shown me that much at least. Or, for example DWB.

    I betray my institutional racism, I suppose, by seeing racism as the exception, rather than the rule. Certainly it exists, among all groups (though, as the “power” group, white racism toward others has the most visible impact). The extent to which it exists is, by this definition, impossible for me to say or judge.

  5. I don’t think they are saying that HAVING future time orientation (FTO) is racist. I think they are saying that the assertion that someone is inferior because they DON’T HAVE such time orientation is racist.

    A concrete example might be: native americans may be considered inferior because they don’t think about and plan for the future etc in the same way as white americans do.

    Another example might be that an ethnic kid from an underpriveledged background might be considered stupid/lazy/uninterested by his/her school teachers because he/she tends to live in the “now” and not think about the future. In reality though, the nature of the kids life, i.e severe financial restrictions means that just thinking about each day as it comes is a must, and thinking about the long term future is an endulgence that just doesn’t contribute to getting through each day.

    I think that’s what the Seattle Public Schools board is trying to get at. It’s not what WE think that is racist, it’s what we assume about what OTHERS think that is racist. That’s my $0.02

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *