<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The logical conclusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2007/02/07/the_logical_conclusion.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2007/02/07/the_logical_conclusion.html</link>
	<description>News and Nattering ... What will the children think?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:16:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avocet</title>
		<link>http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2007/02/07/the_logical_conclusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-18783</link>
		<dc:creator>Avocet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/wp/2007/02/07/the-logical-conclusion.html#comment-18783</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did they remember to criminalize birth control within a marriage?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they remember to criminalize birth control within a marriage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Helstrom</title>
		<link>http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2007/02/07/the_logical_conclusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-18782</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Helstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/wp/2007/02/07/the-logical-conclusion.html#comment-18782</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Even though if passed this would annul our marriage, Rick and I both decided we&#039;d vote for it if it actually makes it to the ballot.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though if passed this would annul our marriage, Rick and I both decided we&#8217;d vote for it if it actually makes it to the ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary o</title>
		<link>http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2007/02/07/the_logical_conclusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-18781</link>
		<dc:creator>mary o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/wp/2007/02/07/the-logical-conclusion.html#comment-18781</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathon Swift would be proud.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathon Swift would be proud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webs</title>
		<link>http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2007/02/07/the_logical_conclusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-18780</link>
		<dc:creator>Webs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/wp/2007/02/07/the-logical-conclusion.html#comment-18780</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for pointing out the absurdity of the Washington Ruling.  I mean really, procreation is the new reason not to allow same sex marriage.  I want to say more but the stupidity of the matter has rendered my brain useless.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out the absurdity of the Washington Ruling.  I mean really, procreation is the new reason not to allow same sex marriage.  I want to say more but the stupidity of the matter has rendered my brain useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boulder Dude</title>
		<link>http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2007/02/07/the_logical_conclusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-18779</link>
		<dc:creator>Boulder Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/wp/2007/02/07/the-logical-conclusion.html#comment-18779</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hehehe...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, I saw that yesterday and I loved it in a money where your mouth is kind of way.  With all the righties saying that the reason you can&#039;t have gay marriage is because that those marriages do not create children, this law should go far in if nothing else making that arguement appear to be the silly yhing that it is.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehehe&#8230;</p>
<p>Yes, I saw that yesterday and I loved it in a money where your mouth is kind of way.  With all the righties saying that the reason you can&#8217;t have gay marriage is because that those marriages do not create children, this law should go far in if nothing else making that arguement appear to be the silly yhing that it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
