Given Trump's bombastic style, it's little wonder that his aggressive assertions and broad generalizations came under more fire from fact-checkers than Clinton's. What's also interesting here is that none of the lists are the same; the number of checkable assertions was so high that editors are picking and choosing which ones to zero in on.
The Guardian – Good, readable summary and discussion of various claims both candidates made. [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/19/third-presidential-debate-fact-check-trump-clinton]
Associated Press – Another decent set of claim examinations, focused on where the claims were dubious. Gets a little he-said/she-said. [https://www.yahoo.com/news/ap-fact-check-trump-clinton-debate-claims-020822303–election.html]
Politifact – A bit more blurby, with less analysis, but a bit more nuanced in its truth ratings. [http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/oct/19/fact-checks-third-presidential-debate-running-stor/]
FactCheck – Tight summary at the top, longer articles beneath, lots of links and sourcing of information.
[http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/factchecking-the-final-presidential-debate-2/]
Washington Post – Longer analysis, and hitting on some different topics than the above reports. It's also a lot more harsh on Trump (not without reason, IMO). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/10/20/fact-checking-the-third-clinton-trump-presidential-debate/]
NPR – Fact checking / annotating within a transcript of the debate itself, which is a nice (if lengthy) way of doing it. [http://www.npr.org/2016/10/19/498293478/fact-check-trump-and-clinton-s-final-presidential-debate]
NBC – Bullet blurbs, albeit with links. [http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/2016-presidential-debates/36-fact-checks-final-presidential-debate-n669866]
Politico – More a series of fact-checking articles, hitting on some different items than above. [http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-presidential-debate-fact-check]
It's worth checking some of these out before relying on "Well, X said in the debate" as an objective fact.
(For the record, I did try to go to Fox News and find a similar fact check analysis. None was visible or searchable. If you run across one, let me know.)
