https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

“Thank Heavens you’re here, Categorization Lad!”

I have this temptation to apply some sort of better categorization to the List of Blogging Honor off to the right. Right now they are in two blocks — fairly…

I have this temptation to apply some sort of better categorization to the List of Blogging Honor off to the right.

Right now they are in two blocks — fairly frequent (daily) posters, and less frequent.

What I’m tempted to do is somehow ID some basic categories — personal journal, link lists, editorial/commentary/essayist. Maybe a 3-point scale (not at all, some, lots) for each. So next to Fred might be “201” if the person does a lot of personal journaling and a bit of essay-writing, but not really much in the way of links. Or something like that. Maybe graphical (empty circle, half-circle, full circle).

That way, if someone were nuts enough to actually follow my suggestion about taking a look at said List, they could at least zero in on the type of blogs they were looking for.

Or not.

Just being Type A here. Nothing to see. Move along.

19 view(s)  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *