https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Hunting for Justices in some of the wrong places

I’ve love to see another female justice on the Supreme Court. A gay justice would be cool, too. And those pasty white guys could probably use a Hispanic, Black, or Asian person to liven up those group pictures. Heck, why not a Muslim or a Buddhist or an Atheist?

But while being a minority or less-empowered member of an ethnic, religious, or sexual group certainly would certainly some interesting perspective to the court, I’d much rather see a pasty white guy who’s a good jurist than someone chosen primarily for their demographic.

So, for example, I’ve been following Kathleen Sullivan as a potential candidate for the bench for some time, if for no other reason than I’d love to be able to talk about how I once fetched ice tea for and was dubbed “chivalrous” by a Supreme Court justice

It is perhaps a sign of my general cluelessness on such matters, but I had no idea that Sullivan was gay (it didn’t come up in our luncheon conversation, and it hasn’t been mentioned in the news articles I’ve read about her, though she is apparently out). Which makes the push by some gay organizations for her nomination on that basis part of the landscape in the justice nomination.

I won’t buy into the buzz word of “identity politics” that the Right likes to throw around (usually followed by “gone wild”). As I said, Sullivan would bring interesting perspectives to the court based on her gender, her orientation, and, heck, all her other life experiences. On the other hand, I wouldn’t want Ellen DeGeneris as a nominee, even if she’s also female and gay, because what we want are people who can serve well as SCOTUS justices, not just people who have the “right” check boxes ticked off next to their demographies.

Fortunately, Sullivan’s credentials for the job are pretty darned solid (she was also strongly in the running for Soliciter General). Groups supporting her should be pushing her nomination n that basis, not on some argument of diversity (which is both obvious and incendiary). If she’s picked, I’ve no doubt that there are folks on the Right who will deride the choice as being a sop to the Teh Evil Liberal Gayz, but it would be nice if there weren’t a lot of people supporting her primarily on that basis to back their claim.

Of course, I’m a pasty white guy, so what do I know?

44 view(s)  

5 thoughts on “Hunting for Justices in some of the wrong places”

  1. Yeah, I was thinking about her as well when Souter decided to step down, mostly because she sounded like a fascinating person.

    Though I can just see the Right going completely Ape shit over this as well.

  2. Oh, absolutely. I saw at least one site suggesting she’d have to recuse herself from cases involving gay rights, and I’m, like, “So all the boys on the bench have to recuse themselves from sexual discrimination cases?”

  3. And here we go…

    But conservative leaders have warned the nomination of a gay or lesbian justice could complicate Obama’s effort to confirm a replacement for Souter, and another Republican senator on Wednesday warned a gay nominee would be too polarizing.

    “I know the administration is being pushed, but I think it would be a bridge too far right now,” said GOP Chief Deputy Whip John Thune. “It seems to me this first pick is going to be a kind of important one, and my hope is that he’ll play it a little more down the middle. A lot of people would react very negatively.”

    Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) also wouldn’t rule out the possibility of a gay nominee, though he said Obama should avoid nominating someone based on ethnic or social profiling. “He should just focus on a proven judge who understands the Constitution and has demonstrated a willingness to support the rule of law,” DeMint said. “I hope this does not turn into some kind of ethnic profiling or social profiling, that it’s got to be a woman or a black or something other. That doesn’t make any sense to me.”

    I.E. some sort of right of center white male would be perfect.

    1. Bah!

      I left out the important prargraph before the ones I quoted:

      Gay-rights groups have voiced hope that Obama will select the first openly gay Supreme Court nominee, and the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund has offered two suggestions: Kathleen Sullivan, a former Stanford Law School dean, and Pam Karlan, another Stanford professor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *