https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

The rise and (possible) fall of campaign yard signs

It has seemed that there are fewer signs this year. The only state ballot proposal one I've seen much of is the vaguely-couched "No on 106" signs, like the ones below, and while I've seen Colorado race signs up, I've seen only a few Trump or Clinton signs in the neighborhood.

While I suspect part of it is a recognition that yard signs only have limited effect, it also seems likely that the personal contention over the presidential campaign this year has suppressed some of that, except, perhaps, in very, very unified areas.




Where have all of Colorado’s campaign yard signs gone?
Political signs are falling out of favor by both campaigns and citizens because of a mix of factors, including their cost and unproven ability to drive votes. Social media has also swiftly replaced…

View on Google+

48 view(s)  

2 thoughts on “The rise and (possible) fall of campaign yard signs”

  1. In our area, all the local legs races are fully represented and in abundance. A lot of the No on 106 ones. A handful in total for Trump and Clinton. A handful of the for SFCD. 1 dem congressional and none of the senate race.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *