Of course we all know The Economist editorial board is a bunch of commies who hate America.
'Our vote, then, goes to Hillary Clinton. Those who reject her simply because she is a Clinton, and because they detest the Clinton machine, are not paying attention to the turpitude of the alternative. Although, by itself, that is not much of an endorsement, we go further. Mrs Clinton is a better candidate than she seems and better suited to cope with the awful, broken state of Washington politics than her critics will admit. She also deserves to prevail on her own merits.'
Yup.
America’s best hope
Why we would cast our hypothetical vote for Hillary Clinton
98 view(s)
The best quote for me was how they prefer Nixon to Trump, even knowing how he turned out.
Well, neocons supporting a neocon is nothing to even blink an eye at. Still confused as to why people are surprised by this.
+Stan Pedzick Except, of course, Sec. Clinton isn't a neocon. I know it might be hard to see from atop Mount Smug, but her platform is fairly progressive.
The Economist also doesn't deserve that label. It's been fairly consistently "Wall Street conservative", not generally supporting the imperialist agenda of the "neocon" GOP.
In other words, you're 0 for 2. See me after class.