https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

On redesigning an icon

I’m fascinated by modern iconography, and reducing information into a compact symbol that is easily understood and universally applied.

This article about the efforts (some of them inadvertent) to redesign the famous wheelchair / accessibility icon, and the emotions and controversy that’s raised, is pretty fascinating, too.




The Controversial Process of Redesigning the Wheelchair Symbol – Atlas Obscura
It has its own emoji, but where did the new Accessible Icon come from?

View on Google+

99 view(s)  

6 thoughts on “On redesigning an icon”

  1. +L Gorrie On the other hand, you need a symbol that's simple enough to recognize – if you try to make a symbol that covers all the disability categories covered by the ADA (or equivalent laws outside the US), you either end up with 3 zillion symbols that nobody knows/understands, or a creeping-horror mutation with 37 arms and 14.8 legs (which in itself is probably a disability)….

    At some point, you have to balance "It's not 100% inclusive" against "screwing with it will probably cut the effective value of the symbol because it's no longer one well-recognized symbol".

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *