The Demon Horse at DIA has made the New York Times.
A statue of a giant male horse — electric-eyed, cobalt blue and anatomically correct — was installed in February 2008 on the roadway approach to the terminal, and it is freaking more than a few people out.
Haters of this work say that “Blue Mustang,” as it is formally known, by the artist Luis Jiménez (killed in 2006 when a section of the 9,000-pound fiberglass statue fell on him during construction), is frightening, or cursed by its role in Mr. Jiménez’s death, or both. Supporters say the 32-foot-tall horse is a triumph, if only as a declaration of Denver’s courage to go beyond easy-listening-style airport art that many cities use like visual Dramamine to soothe travelers’ nerves.
Love it or loathe it, though, “Blue Mustang” is doing what art is supposed to do — get attention. There’s even a poetry slam planned in Denver to read horse haikus, of which about 250 have been composed, believe it or not.
A few elements from story that I didn’t know.
- “The statue was paid for by developers who are required to contribute 1 percent of the cost of major capital projects to public art.” So, good, no (direct) tax dollars involved.
- “The original design called for a pull-off from the airport road, with benches and ample room to contemplate the statue from all angles. After the terrorist attacks of 9/11, however, the parking area idea was shelved for security reasons.” I don’t think that would helped. And, um, people only pull off the airport road to wait for their arriving parties, so it wasn’t a very practical idea, anyway.
- “City policy holds that public art pieces are left in place for five years, anyway, and officials have given no sign of budging.” That’s probably a wise policy, all things considered, even if it means problematic art remains in place too long. Familiarity can breed contentment.
That all said, I think the psycho-babble about the piece — “a declaration of Denver’s courage to go beyond easy-listening-style airport art” … “Is ‘Blue Mustang’ an echo of the city’s high-plains bronco-busting past? Or a mocking denunciation of the Old West conventions?” … “Quality works of public art are not the works that are completely gentle” … “The barriers to approach, artists and art critics say, have compounded the piece’s troubles, making it seem even more forbidding by virtue of isolation” — misses the point. It’s just ugly.
Your (air) Mileage May Vary, of course.
Perhaps it’s illustrative of how weird I am, but I think it’s damned cool and would love to have something like it at Detroit Metro Airport.
Welcome to Detroit. Not a place for sissies.
Les: Heck, I would have thought the condition of the roads in Detroit would have been enough of a warning that Detrot is not for Sissy’s. 🙂
Also, Dave.
Could you provide a link to that actual NYT piece?
D’oh! Hate it when that happens.
Done.
I’m with Dave. Ugly.
Now a statue of a rancor, a sand worm, or Cthulhu? THAT would be cool!
“GReat Cthulhu devours your luggae, fools!”
Except spelled properly *le sigh*
I believe if you are registered and signed in, you can (Edit) your comments. I could be wrong, though.
And, no, there’s no option to edit a comment even if you’re logged in.
Michigan roads aren’t as horrible as some might have you believe. Now our bridges on the other hand…
Huh. Okay, *I* have Edit rights.
Hmmm. More importantly, why is your first comment there showing up in “dark” background, but the one after in normal? *sigh*