https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

An interesting first line

I’d love to see the full manuscript, but I ran across this at RingFAQ.com. FRODO (VOICE OVER) When we turn away from the darkness of our past to take comfort…

I’d love to see the full manuscript, but I ran across this at RingFAQ.com.

FRODO (VOICE OVER)
When we turn away from the darkness of our past to take comfort in our peaceful lives, we sometimes forget how dearly that peace was bought. But there is much worth remembering in the darkness …

— The first line of Fellowship of the Ring,
from an early draft of the script

Now, I like the Galadriel VO (though I didn’t realize it was her when I first watched it). But this is interesting.

On the other hand, for those who don’t know about how the books end, knowing that Frodo actually survives might be something of a spoiler.

Still, neat.

Mere coincidence?

I know who needs binding in the dark …

A clue for the father who was having to discuss with his son throughout the three hours of The Lord of the Rings what was going on: If you have…

A clue for the father who was having to discuss with his son throughout the three hours of The Lord of the Rings what was going on:

If you have to do that, you have taken your son to a movie that is inappropriate for him. Leave. Hang out in the halls and go to the next showing of Jimmy Neutron. Wait for the DVD.

Do not disturb other moviegoers with your attempts to make up for this with your own personal narration. That is rude. It is also useless. It is also extremely annoying.

Thanks. Just wanted to get that off my chest.

WOW, Redux

Went to see LotR again yesterday, this time with Mary (who’d not seen it). I actually enjoyed it more this time, since I was able to appreciate the story for…

Went to see LotR again yesterday, this time with Mary (who’d not seen it). I actually enjoyed it more this time, since I was able to appreciate the story for what it was, not in comparison to the book.

A few personal kvetches also rose to the surface.

More under the “More”

Continue reading “WOW, Redux”

WOW

That’s my summary of Lord of the Rings. We went Christmas Eve morning. It’s been at least a couple of decades since I read through the books, but what I…

That’s my summary of Lord of the Rings. We went Christmas Eve morning. It’s been at least a couple of decades since I read through the books, but what I saw simply blew me away as a very faithful (usually to the letter, always to the spirit) 21st Century film adaptation of a mid-20th Century fantasy novel.

It was the shortest three hours I’ve ever spent.

Ordinarily I’d sprinkle plenty of SPOILER WARNINGS for those few hapless unfortunates who’ve not yet seen it. But instead, through the magic of Movable Type, I can simply use the “More” function to go into the detail of my review. So if you’re interested, do the “More” thing below …

Continue reading “WOW”

The Road Goes Ever On and On …

No, I haven’t seen Lord of the Rings yet. Maybe today, or tomorrow. Meantime, I greet you from Faerie nonetheless. Not that being here in Southern California and visiting with…

No, I haven’t seen Lord of the Rings yet. Maybe today, or tomorrow.

Meantime, I greet you from Faerie nonetheless.

Not that being here in Southern California and visiting with parents and in-laws is really like Faerie. I mean, there’s plentiful food and drink, good company, realms of wonder for Katherine to explore, and a strange, timeless, sense where days rolls by in a quiet, busy blur, and where worldly responsibilities seem to fade in importance …

… until you wake up, like Rip Van Winkle, and twenty years have passed, and all those things you promised yourself you’d work on during your vacation remain undone. Eep!

We made it from Colorado to California safely, and quickly. We didn’t get out of downtown Denver (because of a meeting Margie had to attend) until 10 in the morning. That put us at about 5 p.m. wending through Albuquerque rush hour, and approaching 10:30 as we came up on Flagstaff. We took the southern (I-40) route, rather than cut across Utah, because of reports on the Weather Channel, et al., of snow showers beginning there Friday. Better safe than sorry, and all that.

So as we approached Flagstaff, we also approached a decision. Katherine was intermittently either asleep in the back, or was quietly watching truck lights. We could stop in Flagstaff — and then run the chance that she wouldn’t sleep in the hotel, and the certainty that she’d not want to get back into the van in the morning, or be happy with another day of travel, and there was still that storm that was being predicted, extending even down to Flagstaff — or we could keep going.

We kept going. Margie and I traded off every three hours or so, one of us napping in the back next to Katherine, the other driving into the darkness. We encountered only one blip of weather, fog and sleet coming through the Cajon Pass.

We made it to my In-laws about 5 a.m., handed off Katherine, and caught about 5 hours of sleep. We’ve been kind of catching up ever since (not helped by Katherine having decided Friday night that she really wanted to sleep in bed with Mommy and Daddy, but not really sleep, but squiggle around and kick and giggle).

So here we are. And it’s fun, and Katherine’s having a blast with looking at the Christmas Tree and exploring a new house. She got her bangs cut yesterday, with all family in attendance.

The Christmas cards I worked on so hard last week have arrived with people here in the last few days, so that’s all a good thing.

It looks like all the gifts we shipped have arrived.

I got my “early” Christmas present, my new digital camera. More on that in another post.

My folks have been over the past few evenings — the first a “welcome to California” quiet pizza party, the second a “Pre-Christmas Eve Dinner” last night (since various scheduling difficulties make getting everyone together Christmas Eve problematic).

And I finally got around to blogging. Will wonders ever cease?

Those MIT zanies

MIT and Cal Tech seem to compete as two who can do the best pranks, usually technological (duh). But this one is nice and elegant. (For the clueless out there,…

MIT and Cal Tech seem to compete as two who can do the best pranks, usually technological (duh).

But this one is nice and elegant.

(For the clueless out there, that’s the elvish Tengwar script from Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, with the inscription from the One Ring — “One Ring to rule them all / One Ring to find them / One Ring to bring them all / And in the darkness bind them.”)

I expect, of course, that the Cal Techies will appropriately take over the Rose Bowl scoreboard on the 3rd …

(Via Xkot)

Commercial joy

New commercial for Lord of the Rings. My God. It looks almost as good as sex….

New commercial for Lord of the Rings.

My God. It looks almost as good as sex.

Late to the Rings

Given all the other stuff going on, we’re going to have to pass on a Wednesday Night Trip to the Movies, esp. since that’s the Night Before Christmas Travel. But…

Given all the other stuff going on, we’re going to have to pass on a Wednesday Night Trip to the Movies, esp. since that’s the Night Before Christmas Travel. But Margie promises much Taking In of Tolkien whilst in California.
I am really looking forward to this vacation.
On the bright side, the weather report for Thursday is 54, with comparable high temps on Friday. Which bodes well for at least that aspect of the trip.
On the other hand, any weather forecast more than 4 hours out ’round here has all the accuracy of a randomly selected economist.

Potter and Hobbits – Racists through and through

Chris Henning, in the Sydney Morning Herald opines that children’s tales such as the Harry Potter series or the Lord of the Rings, are “fundamentally racist,” and appeal to us…

Chris Henning, in the Sydney Morning Herald opines that children’s tales such as the Harry Potter series or the Lord of the Rings, are “fundamentally racist,” and appeal to us on that basis.

Yeah. Of course. It’s obvious now that he mentions it.

The appeal of the Lord of the Rings is fundamentally racist. Middle Earth is inhabited by races of creature deeply marked off from one another by language, physical appearance, and behaviour. It is almost a parody of a Hitlerian vision: orcs are ugly, disgusting, brutal, violent – without exception; elves are a beautiful, lordly, cultured elite; in between are hobbits, short, hairy, ordinary, a bit limited, but lovable and loyal and brave when they have to be.
Individuals within races don’t vary from the pattern. To know one is to know all. The races are either dangerous or they are benign. An orc – any orc – is without question an enemy. A hobbit would never side with an orc.

Okay, let’s consider this.

There’s a certain, shallow accuracy to what Henning writes. We don’t see any orcs turning coat and helping the good guys.

However, the sides are not quite as monolithic as that. There’s conflict in the Shire — with some hobbits siding with Saruman when he shows up there, and others working hand-in-glove with the Ringwraiths. The elves are divided, too — intervene or stay aloof or just high-tail it. The humans are certainly divided amongst different camps.

The “good guys” also fight between themselves. Elves and dwarves have an ancient conflict. Hobbits mistrust humans. Humans mistrust elves. Heck, in The Hobbit, the whole kit-n-kaboodle get into a big battle.

And that’s where this thesis begins to fall apart further. Tolkien’s message, in both The Hobbit (at the Battle of Five Armies) and in LotR is that we of good will must hang together, or else we shall surely hang separately. The Fellowship itself represents an unprecedented alliance of elves and dwarves (who work through their racial differences to become the fastest of friends), along with humans of different factions, and, of course, hobbits. When they work together, they succeed. When they fight amongst themselves, they fail.

Is there some “black and white” thinking in LotR? Well, yes, orcs are evil, and, as “corrupted” elves, that’s all they really can be. You can call that racist if you want, but you might as well call the fixation on Aragorn’s bloodline as being racist, too. It’s a standard element of myth, folks, and perhaps it’s an antequated version of “Us vs. Them,” with the orcs as Them/Outsiders/Enemies, but I don’t know that the LotR would have been any better, or more meaningful, had one of the orcs turned out to be a lover of flowers and elves and trees.

What about Harry?

But … but … Harry and his friends are members of an elite. They are not a race, but their powers are handed down the generations from parents to children. The skills must be inherited before they are developed with teaching at Hogwarts. The reader quickly identifies with this genetic elite, the wizards such as Harry, and despises the talentless, boorish muggles.
How we laugh when the Dursleys get into difficulties! They deserve it. They are, after all, just muggles – hapless, fat, brutal and stupid. They’re all like that. Go on, Harry, hit them again and watch them cry.

Where to begin, where to begin …?

Okay, as a parody of English boarding schools, there’s going to be a certain measure of “eliteness” about the setting. That having been said, everything in the series counters Henning’s thesis. The Dursley’s aren’t despised because they’re magic-less muggles. They’re despised because they are cheap, petty tyrants and spoiled brats, oppressing Harry because he is special.

Indeed, much of the magical behind-the-scenes society seems designed to help protect muggles. Magic is not to be used among them, for example. Muggles, and those wizards who come from “mixed” families, are looked down on — but only by the elitists like Draco Malfoy, who is clearly painted as an undesireable, hateful character.

Without attributing too much profundity to the Potter series, it seems that it’s designed more as a glorification of the Everyman than of the elite. Harry’s just a normal kid, raised amongst muggles. Ron’s family, though magical, is poor, and he has to face that challenge against the rich Malfoys of the world.

Are the wizards of Hogwarts an elite? Well, they certainly have talent and skills — some inherited, some trained. But that’s life. My mother has both talent and skill as a violinist — some native, some trained (and practiced, and practiced, and practiced …). That makes her an “elite” in some way, but a book that glorified the wonders of life at a music academy wouldn’t be accused of racism, would it?

Does holding the idea that some people have special talents in some areas that others do not make one elitist, or racist? I sure hope not.

Harry and the hobbits, with their takeaway racism, offer the same comfort for the whole world: join our tribe, be special with us, despise our subhumans.

I’d say Mr. Henning is trying to read his own political message into these books — and the books belie him at every turn.

(Via Xkot’s Discussion Board)

Why Tolkien is better than Rowling

Brian Carney in the WSJ analyzes two tales of magic that are on the screens this winter, and determines that Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings is much more sophisticated and…

Brian Carney in the WSJ analyzes two tales of magic that are on the screens this winter, and determines that Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings is much more sophisticated and moral than Rowling’s Harry Potter.

This kind of moral complexity is simply absent from Ms. Rowling’s books. Contrast Tolkien’s careful use of the ring with Ms. Rowling’s rather flip use of another great artifact of legend, the philosopher’s stone. Alchemists believed the stone would turn lead into gold. As a bonus, it was also thought to confer eternal life. The conceit of “Harry Potter” is that such a stone has been made and the bad guy wants it.

This is a setup worthy of Tolkien; indeed, it mimics his tale in vital respects. But Ms. Rowling’s story manages to bring to light none of the moral dilemmas–of mortality, wealth, power–that the existence of the stone naturally suggests. The reader simply accepts as given that both sides want it, no particular importance is assigned to its powers and Harry never shows any interest in using it. He merely wants to keep it away from the bad guy. Once that’s accomplished, the stone drops out of the story, like a token at the end of some video game.

In Tolkien’s world the temptation of evil is one that all, or nearly all, of his characters must confront. The argument of Tolkien’s tale–controversial, to be sure–is that, while intentions matter, the way we act is far more important than why we act. His story, for all its narrative brio, presents a serious rebuttal to the idea that good ends justify using evil means.

Well, duh.

I mean, Rowling was out to write a good story. Tolkien drew on grand themes, intentionally creating an epic with profound ethical implications. Both succeeded, but to compare the two is like comparing … well, Goldfinger and Lawrence of Arabia.

Still, it’s an interesting article. And it made me want to catch the first installment of LotR even more. Got to arrange a sitter for the 19th ….

(Via InstaPundit)

Speaking of LotR

Burger King, as an official sponsor, has all sorts of LotR-themed commercials going on. They all end with the One Ring looping around and turning into the round BK logo….

Burger King, as an official sponsor, has all sorts of LotR-themed commercials going on. They all end with the One Ring looping around and turning into the round BK logo.

Okay, think about that one for a moment. We want to associate our company logo with an artifact of evil, forged in deception and darkness, by which the Powers of Doom will take over the land, corrupt all that is good, and fill the world with woe.

Either somebody didn’t do their reading assignment before working this account, or I need to start eating at McDonalds more often.

I am Frodo

Or so this quiz says. Which Lord of the Rings character are you? (Actually, that’s not a bad match, for various reasons.) (Via Bears Cave, though I have no idea…

Or so this quiz says. Which Lord of the Rings character are you?

(Actually, that’s not a bad match, for various reasons.)

(Via Bears Cave, though I have no idea how Doyce qualified to be a Nazgul)

Aha! It was the Russkies behind it!

There’s an Internet story going about that bin Laden was “inspired” by Russian-born Isaac Asimov’s seminal sf novel, Foundation. Supposedly that word is an alternate translation for al Qa’eda. The…

There’s an Internet story going about that bin Laden was “inspired” by Russian-born Isaac Asimov’s seminal sf novel, Foundation. Supposedly that word is an alternate translation for al Qa’eda. The story tries to draw vague parallels about a crumbling empire, a distant “foundation” whose leader communicates by video tape, and stuff like that.

Frankly, it seems like a bizarro stretch to me, especially since there is very little if anything philosophically similar between Asimov’s Foundation and bin Laden’s al Qaeda. The Foundation wins its battles against the decadent Foundation through superior science and free enterprise, neither of which seem high on the terrorists’ list of things to pursue. Further, the Foundation largely functions defensively, and is governed more or less democratically. There are no suicide attacks on the Empire. No random bombings. No terror utilized whatsoever, that I can recall.

Now, if Charlie Manson can think that the Beatles are writing songs just for him, I suppose bin Laden might draw on a similarly odd channeling (or bad memory) to be “inspired” by Asimov (a peaceful and intellectual man). But it sounds … kind of screwy. Using the same vague logic, I imagine I could claim that he was inspired by Heinlein’s Starship Troopers, Haldeman’s The Forever War, or Cole & Bunch’s Sten series. Or, for that matter, Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Especially when it comes in a cigar box from a cigar store.

(Via InstaPundit)

Strange searches

The never-ending saga of what sorts of search engine strings bring people to my page. payphones transtar — It appears that TranStar is not only the name of a shuttle…

The never-ending saga of what sorts of search engine strings bring people to my page.

  • payphones transtar — It appears that TranStar is not only the name of a shuttle van service in the Orlando area, but also a telco service. Hmmmm.

  • mysterious tarot ipaq — “Miss Cleo, she not be into all this Palm reading — she prefer the Ipaq …”

  • lotr slash fiction — Now that’s just wrong, no matter how close Sam and Frodo were. On the other hand, I did wonder about Gimli and Legolas ….

  • Hoo. Dee. Frickin’. Hoo.

    Courtesy of my employer’s broadband connection (and a download of QT5, since QT4 won’t hack it), I am now the proud “owner” of the 30Mb trailer to Lord of the…

    Courtesy of my employer’s broadband connection (and a download of QT5, since QT4 won’t hack it), I am now the proud “owner” of the 30Mb trailer to Lord of the Rings. (Both the trailer in various sizes and a static scene-by-scene are available at the site.) This trailer ran on Angel on Monday, but now I can play it and play it and play it some more until Margie bludgeons me with whatever she can find.

    In the words of the Knights of the Dinner Table, Hoody-hoo.

    A typical trailer of flashing images, each building more and more excitement. The calm of the Shire. The menace of Sauron (though I never pictured him embodied, clearly he must have had at least one finger at some point). The pursuing Ringwraiths. Endless, marching armies of evil. The hobbits (and the “reduction” technology looks like it’s going to work, folks). Gandalf (Ian McKellan looks like he is going to rock in this role). Galadriel (looking as etherially powerful and beautiful as I could have imagined). The Fellowship itself. The pursuit by the agents of Sauron (birds swooping overhead as the Fellowship dives for cover). The Western Doors to Moria (and what rises from the pool). The interiors of Moria (stunning in their decay, their grandeur, their detail, be it a corridor, the Hall of Records, the Great Hall, or the Bridge). Orcs. Trolls. Cruel Caradhras. Arwen (and I’m willing to bend enough to see more of Arwen than in the books). And a fleeting glimpse of the Balrog.

    Oh, and Gandalf. Did I mention Gandalf? Some great Gandalf.

    And the rest of the cast looks pretty awesome (when not awesomely pretty), too.

    The movie opens 19 December, which is right before when we leave for California for the Holidays.

    I’m already trying to figure out how to take an extra day off to see it that day.

    This season of Angel brought to you by …

    Many thanks to Doyce for his Herculean efforts to get us All Caught Up on Angel, so that we could watch this evening’s season premiere with a clean conscience. He…

    Many thanks to Doyce for his Herculean efforts to get us All Caught Up on Angel, so that we could watch this evening’s season premiere with a clean conscience.

    He made the comment the other day that some folks who watch Seventh Heaven might be in for a bit of a shock when, seeing the “cute” title of following show, stay tuned to Angel. I think it will only be matched by the angst I expect to go through each week catching the last few minutes of Seventh Heaven before tuning into what follows it. Bleah.

    Made up for, of course, by the kick-ass LOTR trailer.

    On the other hand, is anyone else getting a wee bit tired of the “patriotic” station IDs now showing up on-screen all the time?

    On the other hand, that was one KICK-ASS LORD OF THE RINGS TRAILER.

    Do I have to repeat that again? I suspect I will.

    Morning thoughts

    I’m going to try and at least appear to be doing some work today, rather than the torrent of blogging I indulged in yesterday. Therapeutic as it was, I run…

    I’m going to try and at least appear to be doing some work today, rather than the torrent of blogging I indulged in yesterday. Therapeutic as it was, I run the risk of Letting the Bastards Win if I let them keep me from performing my duties much longer.

    There seems to be — and not just in the not-nearly-as-overblown-as-it-might-have-been(-just-wait) media coverage — a real sense that Things Changed yesterday. The Universe turned the page, and there’s a new chapter heading up there, giving portents of what lies ahead, could we but read type that large.

    Being of an historical bent, I’d rather wait for a few weeks, months, years, before leaping to that conclusion. I think there’s something to it, but trying to assume an historical perspective while in mid-crisis is always a good way to write comedy.

    Sitting around the dinner table last night, we engaged in the “Where were you?” game. That, above all, may be the deciding factor as to how this affects us.

    That and, what happens today? I mean, want a really panicky populace? Pull some crap today. Let folks think it’s a real trend, vs. a (hopefully) one-off tragedy. That would damage confidence, among other things.

    I hope I am not being a Cassandra here.

    The other thing we “need” is a pithy name. Most events of this sort get named after the location. Unfortunately (speaking with irony here), we have too many locations. “Remember the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and some field in Pennsylvania” doesn’t do much as a rallying cry, any more than it does would if you used the same phrase in a “Where were you?” activity. And the media’s “Attack on America” theme is kind of lame, too.

    “Bloody Tuesday”? “The 11th of September”? (“Remember, remember // 11 September, // of aeroplane terror and plot …”)

    I leave it to the media hacks.

    I was reminded, as I considered my call yesterday to rebuild the WTC, of Babylon 5 and some dialog from the pilot episode, “The Gathering.”

    DELENN: “Why Babylon 5? If the prior four stations were lost or destroyed, why build another?”

    SINCLAIR: “Plain old human stubbornness I guess. When something we value is destroyed, we rebuild it. If it’s destroyed again, we rebuild it again … and again and again and … again. Until it stays. That as our poet Tennison once said is the goal: to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.

    I don’t know as the WTC is as noble a symbol as B5. But it is, in some ways, a symbol which has been thrust upon us. To leave it as rubble, or to let something else take its place, would be, in some small way, an admission of defeat.

    110 stories. Twice over.

    Now think of the Murrah Building in OKC. Nine stories.

    The mind reels.

    Finally, there is this. We are what we let this make of us.

    We may become fearful and isolationist. “Don’t let the bad people hurt us — withdraw from the world!” That’s been a typical, if unstated, theme in American history. Indeed, in some ways, that’s just what we’ve been doing in the early days of the Bush administration — pulling out of treaties, acting on our own, being unconcerned about what the rest of the world does. It may well be, though, that by having been attacked so publicly and bloodily, that we will break out of that typical funk — that we will realize, “The wide world is all about you: you can fence yourselves in, but you cannot for ever fence it out.” (Tolkien, Lord of the Rings).

    Or we may rage back in the other direction. Hunt ’em all down. They were Arabs? Attack the Arabs. They were Muslim? Attack the Muslims. Their leader was holed up in Kabul? Carpet-bomb Kabul. In which case, they have, ultimately, won, by transforming the US into just what they claim it is — a killer and bully and infidel. “It is hard to fight with anger; for what it wants it buys at the price of soul.” (Heraclitus)

    And we may decide that the only way to proceed is to insist on safety — no matter how it encroaches on liberty. E-mail monitoring? Censorship? Political oppression? Restrictions on freedom? Those will give at least the illusion of safety, at the cost of privacy, freedom, and the value of open debate.

    If I have prayers for the future, it is not for safety, for life itself is not safe, and while I may never be blown up by a terrorist bomb, I can as easily (and more likely) be hit by a car in a parking lot. And it’s not for vengeance, though I think that, right at this moment, I’d grimly and willingly flip the switch/drop the pill/open the scaffold/give the order to fire.

    No — it’s that we (and by “we” I mean the US, and those who will stand with us) act in our response to this in a fashion that we can be proud of, that can be a model for others in the future. Justice, mercy, freedom, respect, tolerance, commitment. We find the guilty and punish them, but we do so in a fashion beyond reproach, even if it’s harder, even if it’s less satisfying in some atavistic sense. And we take steps to protect ourselves, but not in a way that unduly compromises the basic freedoms that we claim we stand for.

    This can be our finest hour. I pray we don’t blow it, and that we use it to show the world that we are in fact that “shining beacon of freedom” that the President spoke of last night.

    Risk more than others think is safe.
    Care more than others think is wise.
    Dream more than others think is practical.
    Expect more than others think is possible.

    — Cadet Maxim, West Point