- …Aaaand Here’s the Iron Man 2 SDCC Footage – Ooooooh …. aaaaaah …
- The Creation “Museum” [Pharyngula] – Sounds like a “museum” only insofar as the muses covered all areas of entertainment. This is basically an amusement park for Creationism, not a place to explore and learn.
- The Ballad of G.I. Joe Will Break Your Heart – I’ve never been a huge Joe fan — but this is brilliant.
- Rob’s G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra F.A.Q. – Well, now I don’t need to see that movie. Not that it was likely in the first place.
- Populating a Brave New World – I never thought of Mustapha Mond as quite that … white.
- Potential Swine Flu Redux Underscores The Need For Paid Sick Leave: Pat G.
- Gates ‘Furious’ That Brownback And Roberts Placed A Hold On McHugh’s Army Secretary Nomination – I realize it can cut both ways for the political parties, but I’ve found (from either party) these sorts of nomination holds to be really irksome.
- Mark Sanford Used State Plane For Personal Use: Alan
- Charles Atlas profiled – Fascinating story.
- Holiday Inn signs – now and then – Blogged about it before, but, yeah, the New & Improved is pretty Dull & Corporate.
- 1/48-scale model of an F-18 aircraft in Flow Visualization…
- Continental imprisons 50 passengers overnight in grounded plane with no food, overflowing toilets – But, of course, heaven forfend any sort of “Passenger Bill of Rights” style socialism be considered.
- DeMint: Town hall disruptions are ‘unacceptable.’ – “I just don’t understand why the sharks can’t be respectful and orderly when I toss chum into the water.”
- BBC America to air Who uncut, and quicker – Nice. In a world of DVRs, scheduling odd-length shows really isn’t that much of an issue.
- Why Size Matters – Some good reasons why the “go slow” and incremental approach doesn’t fit the health care access debate right now.
- Waxman-Markey as National Security: publius
- Populating a Brave New World – Um … why are we talking about a series of white blondes for Mustapha Mond? Who, at a minimum, is Turkish, if not Arab or African.
Category: Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU)
The MCU in movies and TV — Iron Man, Thor, Captain America, Avengers, Guardians of the Galaxy, Agents of SHIELD, etc.
Book Review: Iron Man
Book adaptations of movies usually are fairly mediocre. Generally based on an earlier version of the script than what shows up on the screen, authors aren’t encouraged to do anything…
Book adaptations of movies usually are fairly mediocre. Generally based on an earlier version of the script than what shows up on the screen, authors aren’t encouraged to do anything new or interesting beyond what’s provided. The result usually feels rewarmed, missing some of the last-moment elements tossed in by the director and actors, and unable to take advantage of the strengths of the written medium vs the video medium.
Peter David’s adaptation of Iron Man suffers from these weaknesses, but a combination of a good writing style (love to see him take on the character in the comics) and a character-oriented script (it’s really a movie about Tony Stark, not about Iron Man), it’s a pleasantly entertaining volume to breeze through.
Iron Man by Peter David (2008)
| Overall | | Story | |
| Re-Readability | | Characters | |
Story: The book recaps the movie pretty well (sans the final “did you stay through the credits?” denouement), relating Tony Stark’s fall and rise again as Iron Man. David has commented that the script he worked from was pretty much what was shot, and it’s true. There are a few extra bits that ended up in the movie (mostly visuals and quips), and some exposition and expansion of a few scenes (e.g., what Pepper and Rhodey were doing while Tony was captive, added scenes with SHIELD), along with a few explanations and logistics (how characters get from location X to Y), etc. That’s nice, but not essential.
Characters: Same as above. David lets us learn a bit more about the characters (through benefit of being in their heads), rounding things out. It’s not required for enjoying the movie, though, and it doesn’t add a huge amount to what’s already there on screen.
Re-Readability: Really, having read it once, I’ll satisfy myself watching the DVD (once it’s released). Despite being written by one of my favorite authors, it’s not that entertaining on its own (in contrast), though it’s not a bad book in and of itself.
Overall: I feel like I’ve been a bit harsh here, and that’s probably not fair. The fact is, i enjoyed the movie a lot. The book simply isn’t as good as the movie, almost inevitably given the material and the restrictions an adaptor has to follow. Though there are some nice additional bits of internal perspective that are worth reading, fans of the movie needn’t feel obliged to rush right out and get the book for fear of missing essential plotty stuff — but if they do, they won’t be appalled at what they find, either.
If you’ve never seen the movie — you’re better off seeing the movie than the book (IMO). On the other hand, if you’re at loose ends and if your only choice of something to read is this book — well, it’s actually not a bad read in and of itself. You could certainly do worse.
(The book is based on the screenplay by Mark Fergus & Hawk Ostby and Art Marcum & Matt Holloway. Yikes!)
Ebert on Iron Man
Roger Ebert nails it on why Iron Man is such a good movie (and a better super-hero movie than, say, most of the X-franchise and so many others): The…

Roger Ebert nails it on why Iron Man is such a good movie (and a better super-hero movie than, say, most of the X-franchise and so many others):
- The grounded feeling of long-term reality around the Stark corporation and the relationships between Stark, Potts, and Stane.
- Letting the Tony Stark character be who he is — avoiding taking himself (and the genre) too seriously. At the same time, letting the other characters be serious, not competitively witty. The tension there keeps the movie from either being camp and self-mocking, or being too self-importantly grave (no preaching about mutant equality, no overdoing the “great power / great responsibility” or Messianic Son of Krypton, no sense of the hero as being a real nutcase who ought to be locked up in Arkham Asylum, too).
- Conveying the personalities of the guys inside the battle armor even as they’re fighting, rather than having them appear to be a video game break in a rock’em-sock’em-robot battle. Making the movie be about people, not the technology (or the SFX).
At the end of the day it ‘s Robert Downey Jr. who powers the lift-off separating this from most other superhero movies. You hire an actor for his strengths, and Downey would not be strong as a one-dimensional mighty-man. He is strong because he is smart, quick and funny, and because we sense his public persona masks deep private wounds. By building on that, Favreau found his movie, and it’s a good one.
Of course, the fact that the SFX are kick-ass fun doesn’t hurt.
Good times. Almost makes me want to go back and see it in the theaters again.
(via BD, et al.)
Marvels
Buoyed by Iron Man’s deservedly boffo box office, Marvel today offered up some future release dates: 30 Apr 2010: Iron Man 2 4 Jun 2011: Thor (dir. Matthew Vaughn) 6 May…
Buoyed by Iron Man‘s deservedly boffo box office, Marvel today offered up some future release dates:
- 30 Apr 2010: Iron Man 2
- 4 Jun 2011: Thor (dir. Matthew Vaughn)
- 6 May 2011: The First Avenger: Captain America
- Jul 2011: The Avengers
Plus Ant-Man (meh) is still being planned, and we have Incredible Hulk and another Punisher movie coming up this year.
Now — will they be as good as Iron Man — or good enough, at least? It’s going to be a tough act to follow — but while the CG was easier for this than some of the others (it’s easier to make a realistic-looking gleaming metal suit than a realistic-looking person, cf. Hulk), the lesson of Iron Man is that you can actually (a) stay true to the source material, (b) bring in good talent, and (c) write a good story, and you’ll have a success. Screwing with any of those is asking for trouble.
(via Les)
Movie Review: Iron Man
Went to a Friday afternoon matinée with Mary and Stan. No spoilers below. Iron Man (2008) Overall Story Production Acting Story: Near-flawless updating of the Vietnam-era origin of…
Went to a Friday afternoon matinée with Mary and Stan. No spoilers below.

Iron Man (2008)
| Overall | | Story | |
| Production | | Acting | |
Story: Near-flawless updating of the Vietnam-era origin of Marvel’s armored super-hero, now brought forward to the 00s and set in Afghanistan. The subsequent technical and character development come across as a bit rushed, but still work very nicely. The final Boss Fight (so to speak) feels a bit off — perhaps because it’s set up as so uneven to begin with. There’s also a bit too much complexity of too many villains …
But, by and large, the story blends drama, humor, philosophy, action, and just plain ol’ fun. It’s seriously sequel-worthy — and the (very) ending seems to make that point clear.
Acting: Robert Downey, Jr., does the great half-sozzled playboy genius, Tony Stark, as well as the mad scientist-tinkerer who builds the armor and dashes off to do good.
The supporting cast is pretty good, though not spectacular — Jeff Bridges does a fine Obadiah Stane, albeit a bit mouth-frothing toward the end; Terrence Howard’s Jim Rhodes doesn’t really stand out; Gwyneth Paltrow’s Pepper Potts is usually excellent, except when she gets all vaporish and girly.
Production: You will believe a man can fly. You will believe there’s a guy wearing the armor. You will believe the armor is the most kick-ass thing on the planet. The rest of the hi-tech bits are also very, very nice. And the other production values are nothing to sneeze at.
Overall: More than one person I’ve read says it sets the bar for super-hero films. It certainly ranks right up in the top two or three (with The Incredibles still at the top, in my opinion).
And be sure to sit through to the end of the credits!
Movies to come …
Things I’m looking forward to in this summer’s movie queue: Iron Man (5/2): Okay, that’s not really summer yet, but it counts. Looks like great fun (Peter David says it…
Things I’m looking forward to in this summer’s movie queue:
- Iron Man (5/2): Okay, that’s not really summer yet, but it counts. Looks like great fun (Peter David says it is.)
- Speed Racer (5/9): I don’t care. I want to see it.
- Prince Caspian (5/16): One to go see with Kitten? Maybe so, since I saw the first one with her.
- Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (5/22): Oh, yeah.
- Kung Fu Panda (6/6): I’m not sure I want to see this, but I suspect I will have little choice.
- Hellboy II: The Golden Army (7/11): Woot! Hellboy! Woot!
Maybes:
- Incredible Hulk (6/13): Have never seen the whole of the first Ang Lee flick, but what I saw didn’t wow me. This one is, supposedly, maybe, sorta better.
- Get Smart (6/20): I think Steve Carell can pull the Don Adams role off. The question is — will it be any good? Might wait on word of mouth for this one.
- WALL-E (6/27): I suspect I will have no choice on this one, either, and it should be Pixariffic goodness — I just get a weird vibe about it.
- Wanted (6/27): I found the Mark Millar comic tale train-wreck fascinating but ultimately nihilistic and unsatisfying. I have little doubt it will be toned down for the big screen, and it’s an interesting enough idea that I’m curious as to what they do with it.
- Hancock (7/2): Will Smith as a down-and-out superhero. Hmmmm.
- The Dark Knight (7/11): I am ashamed to say I haven’t yet seen the first of the new Batman movies. So I’m not sure I’ll see this one any time soon.
- The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon King (8/1): For a franchise from a movie that I consider one of my all-time faves, I’ve been increasingly disappointed with each installment — and this going back to the well again doesn’t strike me as a promising idea.
Now, how the heck I’m going to see these things when we average about, oh, three movies a year, is beyond me …
“Heroes aren’t born, they’re built”
The next Iron Man trailer is out. I don’t know if it will be any good, but it’s going to look good and it sure seems like it’s going…
The next Iron Man trailer is out.
I don’t know if it will be any good, but it’s going to look good and it sure seems like it’s going to be fun.
(via “Squeee!” BD)
“Does Whatever an Iron Can …”
I can’t decide if this movie is going to be really stupid or pretty decent — but the trailer for the new Iron Man is certainly fun. (via Les)…
I can’t decide if this movie is going to be really stupid or pretty decent — but the trailer for the new Iron Man is certainly fun.
(via Les)
Ultimate Avengers II
Catching up on DVR stuff yesterday afternoon, I finally watched the recent Marvel/Lionsgate animation, Ultimate Avengers 2. I missed the original, alas — well, maybe not so alas, but…

Catching up on DVR stuff yesterday afternoon, I finally watched the recent Marvel/Lionsgate animation, Ultimate Avengers 2. I missed the original, alas — well, maybe not so alas, but I did miss that, so I came into this episode “cold.”
Not that it hurt me that much, as the writers made sure that no subtext or plot line went unaluded to or unflashbacked. Which is fine, really, but it made an already rather lightweight production mixed-metaphorically flabby.
The cartoon is based on the Ultimates series, part of Marvel’s updated, hip, violent, oh-so-cool Ultimate universe. The Ultimates are that universe’s rendition of the Avengers, but since the latter have the name recognition as a group (such as it is), the animateds carry both titles.
The show follows along the characters and setting of the Ultimates pretty well — along the same lines as, say, the Rankin-Bass Lord of the Rings does so the books (“Frodo … of the Nine Fingers …”). Costumes and temperments map up pretty well, though some of the more mature audience extremes — Stark as a real drunken playboy, Giant Man as a wife beater, Thor as a lunatic, Hulk as murderer, etc. — are toned down for the audience. That said, I’d probably rate this for 9- to 10-year-olds
— some of the settings are grim, and some of the action gets a bit bloody at times. The problem is, the sophistication of the story is right on line with what you’d expect 9-10yo’s to like.
The specific tale follows from the alien invasions of the first movie. The Hulk is imprisoned, Cap is plagued by visions from his past. And, off in Africa, the hidden jungle kingdom of Wakanda is being invaded by some of the aliens, led by (apparently) a Nazi officer. The story goes through Prince T’Challa taking the throne, engaging with the Ultimates to get help (countering against Wakandan xenophobia), Cap getting a second crack against an old arch-enemy, Hank and Janet quarreling, Tony trying out different
armors, Thor ticking off his Daddy by helping the morals anyway, etc. And, oh yeah, a big alien invasion.
(Ironically, there are a ton of similarities between the alien invasion here and that in the premiere episode of the recent Justice League animated series — similarities beyond both of them paying tribute to H.G. Wells. I leave the viewer to draw them out.)
The animation is okay — not nearly as slick as much anime or as stylized as the DC Universe shows of late, but passable. The end titles have some of the Bryan Hitch designs for the Ultimates, which shows off both how closely they’ve toed the line and how far from the mark in quality they are.
The plot is where this movie struggles. The external foe is hackneyed at best (invading aliens led by a shape-shifting Nazi spy? Jeez, even Stan the Man would have problems with that one these days), and much of what makes the Ultimates so interesting — their interpersonal conflicts and individual failings within the context of celebrity and Great Power — is toned down here to the point of being nearly pointless. The Pyms bicker. Cap is haunted. Thor and Odin don’t get along. Tony is egotistical and a slacker.
Banner is … well, Banner. T’Challa, meanwhile, misses the mark as the Black Panther of either world — combining a bit of the Lion King with Wolverine, but without the charm or attraction of either.
As a way to pass a bit of time in the afternoon, there are far worse ways of going. Frankly, though, this has minimal rewatchability and was entertaining only as a comic book fan, not in and of itself. Caveat emptor.
Getting it right
Kudos to Sam Raimi, et al., for Spider-Man. Moreso than Burton’s Batman or the first two Superman flicks, this film captures both the spirit and the story of an iconic…
Kudos to Sam Raimi, et al., for Spider-Man. Moreso than Burton’s Batman or the first two Superman flicks, this film captures both the spirit and the story of an iconic comic book character.
Spidey has never been my favorite character (only Joe Straczynski’s current stint on the book has placed it in the coveted “Must Save Best for Last” category), but he’s often been solid comic book entertainment. I’ve reread the old Lee/Ditko tales, and the later creative teams, multiple times.
When you make a movie about a well-known story — whether it’s The Scarlet Letter, or Spider-Man — you have a couple of choices. You can try to make the story your own, emphasizing some particular aspect of the story or characters to zoom in on and emphasize. That’s what Burton did, turning Batman from brooding detective to borderline schizo. (It worked brilliantly, by the by.)
Alternately, you can try to find the heart of the tale, what makes it so well-known and iconic, and crank up the volume on that. Raimi takes this approach, blending the well-known lesson of “With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility” with the tale of a nerd who gets what any nerd would dream of — strength, grace, skills — and discovers that it does not automatically make his life wonderful. The result is something that Lee and Ditko from 1962 would find recognizable and probably enjoy very much.
(SPOILER warnings for what follows.)
