https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Giving (up) the Bird

A Farewell to Elons.

Twitter Oatmeal fail whale
Via here .

Like a lot of other folk (“all the cool kids are doing it!”), I’m suspending use of Twitter for the indefinite future. I’ve already been cutting back substantially the last month or so, but between the likelihood that the system is going to crash and burn technologically, if not socially, and that most of the key folk I followed on Twitter have departed — well, there are not much reason to be here, and many reasons not to be.

So my @Three_Star_Dave Twitter account, and the automatic quotation tweets to @WISTquotes will go silent unless things substantially change on Twitter. That’s unfortunate, because Twitter (while always having had problems) has been an amazing global resource, and an avenue to contact people in an remarkable array of walks of life. It’s been a precious news and communication channel in a way I think we haven’t realized. I’ve learned a ton there, and stayed in touch with a lot of people there. It wasn’t as satisfying as my previous social media community on Google+, but it had many great moments.

Elon Musk

But the onset of Elon Musk — who I’m convinced got sucked into taking over Twitter in as inadvertent and self-inflicted a fashion as Donald Trump turned a publicity stunt into an unexpected term in the White House — has ruined the place for me. The growing, free-wheeling hatred and deplorable culture that Musk is so amused by (and that he is encouraging so as to drive up numbers and sell lots of advertising) is too reprehensible for me to support by even my small sliver of traffic.

A number of thoughtful people have suggested continuing to fight the good fight there. Don’t give up. Don’t let the bastards win. And there’s something to be said for that.  But as a tactic it assumes that actually being there can make a difference, and that it isn’t actually hurting the cause by keeping up the numbers Elon keeps waving at advertisers to bring them back.

It’s still a legit tactic. But not one for me.

So … where to now?

My own blog here has lain relatively fallow for a while, except when I choose to make long-form writing stuff (usually reviews). I have utterly no desire (still) for Facebook — if Twitter is turning Chaotic Evil, FB has for a long time been the social media face of Lawful Evil (as a company).

Twitter to Mastodon migrationInstead, for the last few weeks I’ve been using Mastodon. It’s a marginally clunkier version of Twitter, stylistically, but its diverse federated nature means it’s less vulnerable to take-overs like Elon’s, and elements of its design — most particularly, a lack of “algorithm” to drive the most infurating info directly into your face — make for an experience much more pleasant, and a culture that’s a heck of a lot more civil (in my experience) and less doomscrolling than Twitter has been for a long while.

It’s not perfect, by any means, but it’s pretty decent. As a small pond, still, I’m getting a lot more engagement from others than I have on the birdsite. And a lot of the voices I was most interested in following on Twitter have shifted full- or part-time to Mastodon.

Mastodon icon
All the cool kids are doing it.

I’m not deleting my old Twitter accounts — at least not yet. I may still poke my head over to see what’s going on (or to steal some material). But going forward, my former Twitter @three_star_dave sort of content can be found at https://mstdn.social/@three_star_dave, and my WIST stuff is being rebroadcast to https://zirk.us/@WISTquotes. Running on different instances means I can keep both accounts open in my browser, which is handy.

And I’ve figured out a decent RSS feed of the Mastodon stuff in the right margin of my blog here, too. So … commitment!

Hope to see you there.

Trump is ticked off about the “Roseanne” cancellation. Kind of.

Actually what he seems irked by is that ABC’s Bob Iger called Valerie Jarrett to apologize for Roseanne Barr acting like an ass, but didn’t call up Trump to apologize for people saying “HORRIBLE” things about him on the ABC.

Bob Iger of ABC called Valerie Jarrett to let her know that “ABC does not tolerate comments like those” made by Roseanne Barr. Gee, he never called President Donald J. Trump to apologize for the HORRIBLE statements made and said about me on ABC. Maybe I just didn’t get the call?

You’re freaking President of the United States, Donald. As one of your predecessors put it, “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.”

Also, do you usually refer to yourself in the third person and by full name and title? Or is the idea that you are a Much More Important Person, and therefore much more deserving of an apology?

Have you recently apologized for the “HORRBLE” statements you’ve said about others, Donald? Just wondering.

But keep sitting by the phone waiting for that call, Donald. I’m sure it’s coming. Just … keep … waiting …




Donald Trump Complains About Roseanne Cancellation, Bob Iger

Original Post

We almost got a 2-hour Tarantino “Lord of the Rings” movie

Actually, I’d be fascinated to see a Tarantino LotR movie, but this was the loathsome Harvey Weinstein trying to convince Peter Jackson to reduce his LotR ambitions to a gutted 2-hour fantasy adventure flick, threatening to bring in Tarantino or someone else instead to make the film.

Weinstein told Jackson he had to make one two-hour film or he would be replaced by Shakespeare in Love director John Madden, or Tarantino. “Harvey was like, ‘you’re either doing this or you’re not. You’re out. And I got Quentin ready to direct it’,” Ken Kamins, a producer who worked for Weinstein on the project, told the author.

Jackson said he got a memo dated 17 June, 1998 from Jack Lechner, the development head of Weinstein’s company Miramax, detailing “a more radical, streamlined approach”, which would allow the story to be told in one film. This would have meant cutting the Helm’s Deep valley, having Eowyn replace Faramir as Boromir’s sister, the Balrog would disappear and Saruman too was on shaky ground, the Stuff website reports. “It was literally guaranteed to disappoint every single person that has read that book,” Jackson told Nathan.

Mercifully, Weinstein was convinced to let Jackson shop the project around, and New Line Cinema jumped on the opportunity.




Kill Bilbo! Weinstein ‘threatened to hire Tarantino’ for Lord of the Rings | Film | The Guardian

View on Google+

The US Public Domain floodgates prepare to open

It’s hard to believe that the major media companies will actually let things start sliding into the public domain again on 1 January 2019. But is there any desire or will in Congress to protect Big Media right now? (This may be the sole tarnished silver lining of having the GOP in charge, given that the Dems have tended to be more Big Media-friendly.)

Here’s hoping the past starts being accessible again.




A Mass of Copyrighted Works Will Soon Enter the Public Domain – The Atlantic
For the first time in two decades, a huge number of books, films, and other works will escape U.S. copyright law.

View on Google+

As the world shifts to streaming “licensed” material

Once upon a time, you bought records. The tapes (of various sorts). Then CDs.

You bought the music and, beyond certain laws against using it for a public performance, it was yours: tangible, possessable, loanable.

(Of course, if you lost the CD, or the LP got a bad scratch on it, you were SOL. So there was that down side.)

The rise of online music services created — for a time — a hybrid model. You could buy stuff, but that stuff could be kept online. No need to download it. Heck, if you already had music files, you could upload them to those services.

Gradually, those services started pushing streaming content — you don’t “own” the music, you pay for a period of access to a library of music. Once you stop paying, you can’t listen.

There was still a hybrid model, though — the streaming services (we’ll tag the main ones as iTunes, Google Music, and Amazon music) let you upload the MP3 files you owned, and you could listen to them (or the matched tracks from the streaming service), and you could (for a monthly fee) access the streaming service as well.

Now that model is beginning to fade, as Amazon announces that it will stop letting you upload music to its Amazon Music servers; you’ll still have access (when that goes into effect) to music you bought at Amazon, or, of course, to the Amazon streaming service.

It is probably incredibly Luddite to me that I still prefer knowing that I have my own, personal copy of my music files, not contingent on Amazon (or whomever) staying in business, or not changing the terms of the streaming agreement. But by a wild coincidence I was looking today at options for music access on family mobile phones (given our own internal, weird music setup of physical files, iPods, etc.), and had decided to go with Google vs Amazon as the streaming / connecting / music site of choice.

If I had any doubts about it, Amazon just settled them.




Amazon Music removes ability to upload MP3s, will shutter storage service
Take some time to re-download all those tracks you previously uploaded.

View on Google+

And a few odd thoughts about the Disney/Fox Merger Thing

Mostly having to do with Fox properties that will now suddenly be owned by Disney.

First off: we have the prospect of More Disney Princesses, per the EW article below. That includes folk like Anastasia, Neytiri, and (not pictured below) … Ellen Ripley [1]?

And since The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe was done by Fox, that means Susan and Lucy Pevensie could be Disney Princesses, too. And the Tilda Swinton’s White Witch can hang out with Maleficent over on the Disney Villain side of things.

Speaking of Neytiri … okay, this transaction certainly puts an interesting new spin on the new Avatar Land at Walt Disney World Animal Kingdom — financially, if not creatively.

Looking at movie properties and franchises a bit more in-depth, Chris Evans is already floating the idea of a Captain America / Human Torch buddy movie, with him playing / reprising both roles.

I am very much hoping that this doesn’t mean Alvin and the Chipmunks coming to Disneyland.

Also noted: the idea that maybe Dr. Frank N Furter could become a Disney Princess, too.

All of this depends on the Justice Dept. giving the okay to the merger. That could be an interesting set of discussions, too, esp. given the Murdoch family’s involvement, and part of the company they’re not selling off: Fox News.

——

[1] The argument being that if Mulan can be a princess, so can another kickass female warrior. Ripley didn’t get an Emperor to bow down before he, but she did kill a Queen.




11 characters who are now technically Disney princesses
Disney’s over-$52 billion purchase of 20th Century Fox assets means a brand new pantheon of characters have entered the House…

View on Google+

When Marvel Universes Collide!

This article gets a little breathlessly geeky in places, but there’s no doubt that the folk running Marvel Pictures right now are salivating over finally getting their hands on the X-Men and Fantastic Four franchises — heroes and villains alike.

If they follow their pattern, we’ll see stand-alone films there before any serious integration with the rest of the MCU, though cameos are possible, a la Spider-Man in Civil War. And that’s fine — fitting them into phase 4 and phase 5 is going to be tricky enough without moving too fast.

This also gives Marvel/Disney some greater flexibility with their original core heroes aging out or retiring from their roles. “What the heck do we do with the Avengers if Iron Man, Cap, Thor, and Hulk are all gone?” is a little less urgent a question when there are these additional characters to play with.

For me, what I’m most looking forward to is Ike Perlmutter and Marvel Comics deciding it’s okay to have a Fantastic Four comic book again. The FF’s substantive absence from the Marvel Universe has been unusually refreshing in some ways, but knowing it was driven by Perlmutter not wanting to promote characters showing up in Fox movies was particularly maddening. Those days should be drawing to a close soon.




The X-Men, the Avengers, the Merger, and What It’ll Mean

View on Google+

When Google and Amazon get into a pissing match

… pretty much everyone ends up getting splashed.

The two companies’ escalating “We’re blocking this” / “We won’t sell that” / “We don’t support this” / “We won’t even display that” thing demonstrates the dangers of such pervasive companies in media and Internet and commerce. It’s not, quite yet, completely disruptive (at least to my family’s use of the ecosystem), but worrisome.

The value of Big Combine Companies is how convenient and synergistic they can be. The danger is how impactful their shenanigans can be.




Google and Amazon are punishing their own customers in a bitter feud
These companies need to grow up, and Google shouldn’t be taking YouTube away from anyone.

View on Google+

How can you tell when an ISP is lying?

When its marketing people are talking.

Either …

… Net Neutrality regulations under Title II status were a horrifyingly bad thing for the networking industry, suppressing investment, quashing innovation, and making a great case to Republicans for getting rid of such regulation.

… or …

… Net Neutrality had little to no effect, with robust ISPs continuing to invest and grow and innovate, and making a great case for Investors to keep driving up the company stock price.

Of course, Charter can have it both ways, because the GOP was always going to get rid of Net Neutrality once it came to power, and who cares if someone notices Charter saying contradictory things because what’s anyone going to do about it?




Charter brags about big speed boost—after saying Title II stalled investment
Charter told investors that net neutrality regs “didn’t really hurt us.”

View on Google+

Comcast isn’t even bothering to promise about actual net neutrality anymore

Comcast used to argue vehemently that FCC restrictions on it as an ISP related to Net Neutrality were so unnecessary because they would never, never, ever violate Net Neutrality in the future, even if there were no FCC regulations on the subject.

Strangely enough, from the day when the FCC announced it was going to ignore public input on the matter and get rid of its Net Neutrality regulations, Comcast ratcheted back its pinky swear to simply say they don’t (right now) do many things that people would deem violating Net Neutrality.

But, then, it’s not like they have to persuade either the public or the FCC any more, right?

(For those who have only heard about Net Neutrality in “It’s evil! Pure evil!” speeches from your radio pundits and local politicians, it’s the principle that Internet providers should not (a) block legal Internet content just because they think it’s wrong or because they find it competitively inconvenient, (b) slow down or throttle content, again because they don’t like it or because they own or have deals with competing content providers, or (c) allow content providers (including themselves) to pay to provide their content more quickly than competitors.

So, for example, Comcast is owned by NBC Universal. If all of a sudden Comcast prioritized or fast-laned NBC content, and/or slowed down or or blocked Fox content, or reduced the content quality — that would be a violation of Net Neutrality. And since most people don’t have a choice about their cable Internet provider, that’s why it’s a problem, and why getting rid of Net Neutrality regulations is going to lead to all sorts of interesting shenanigans that make a lot of big companies a lot of money at the expense of their captive customers.)




Comcast deleted net neutrality pledge the same day FCC announced repeal
Three-year-old “no paid prioritization” pledge was suddenly removed.

View on Google+

We might finally get an “Avengers vs X-Men’ (etc.) movie

That is, if the current negotiations to sell 21st Century Fox’s studio/media properties to Disney comes to pass.

I’m not usually big into major media consolidation, but I’m willing to do it so that Marvel Studios could get the X-stuff back and the Fantastic Four. Wowzers.




21st Century Fox has been holding talks to sell to Disney: Sources
21st Century Fox has been holding talks to sell most of the company to Walt Disney Co., sources say.

View on Google+

Mired in the Kingdom of This World

This is a fascinating interview with Terry Heaton, a TV producer who in the 80s and 90s helped get Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network off the ground, building up the 700 Club and all that jazz to become media empires … and deeply entangled with Republican politics. Today, he regrets it.

What’s interesting to me is that this is not a “Guy was in evangelical circles, guy got disillusioned, guy quits God, guy writes a book.” Its partly that (he is, in fact, flogging his new book on the subject), but Heaton hasn’t lost his faith. Instead, he thinks his experience helped him in his belief, by pointing out how easy it is to go from good intentions to less-than-good actions, and to let temporal considerations begin to hold sway over considerations of faith.

Along the way, he talks about Pat Robertson, both his admiration for the man, and where Robertson became a victim of his own success and the need for more.




Former 700 Club producer: “I knew where the line was. But that didn’t stop us.”
Pat Robertson’s former producer Terry Heaton talks The 700 Club, Trump, and turning the Bible “into a self-help manual.”

View on Google+

When Media Behemoths Collide!

NBCUniversal — having now acquired DreamWorks — is set to go toe-to-toe with Disney in movies, animation, TV networks, and theme parks.

Disney has an edge in major IP franchises — but NBCUniversal has Comcast (or, more properly, Comcast has NBCUniversal).

It should be interesting — in a big-money, duopolistic way.




NBCUniversal acquires DreamWorks Animation Studios | The Disney Blog
NBCUniversal is the closest thing to a rival to The Walt Disney Company in the market today and with the just announced acquisition of DreamWorks animation, that rivalry just got a bit more heated. NBCUniversal, which is owned by Comcast, now effectively owns two animation studios, DreamWorks and Illumination Entertainment,…

View on Google+

On the Forever Franchise of "Star Wars"

Frankly, if they are all (or even mostly) as good as "The Force Awakens, " I have no problem with an endless series of Star Wars movies. Or Marvel movies. Or whatever.

I mean, we don't have problems with a TV show being 13 or 26 episodes in a single year, or of shows being renewed for another season. Nobody says, "OMG, another episode of that show this week, too? Why can't Hollywood give us different stand-alone TV shows each week, instead of endless sequels? Where is their creativity?"

Aside from the time spans involved, it's much the same thing with a movie series. And if they start to suck, the box office will drop and they'll stop making them.

There's nothing evil about a movie franchise, even if it includes associated one-off movies in the shared universe. And if a given franchise is not your cuppa, well, it's not like there is a shortage of entertainment out there to watch (or read, or listen to, or play) instead.




You Won’t Live to See the Final Star Wars Movie | WIRED
If the people at Disney have anything to say about it, the past four decades of Star Wars were merely prologue.

View on Google+

Star Trek boldly goes where you have to pay separately for it

Dear CBS — I'm tickled that you are starting up a new Star Trek TV series, and I'm sure it will be interesting.

I'm also sure I won't be watching it if you are confining it (after the premiere episode) to your separate $5.99/month streaming service.

Did the Ferengi suggest this as a good marketing strategy? Just wondering.




CBS Needs Star Trek to Show It Gets the Streaming Future | WIRED

View on Google+

Siri will answer any question … for the right price

Really, Apple?

(By the way, "Okay, Google" answers the question just fine, routing over to Wikipedia and pulling up the appropriate page. The answer, as it happens, was Michael Jackson's "Billie Jean.")




Siri won’t answer some questions if you’re not subscribed to Apple Music
If you want Siri to answer your questions about the top songs on the charts, you’ll need to sign up for Apple Music first. Users online, including Pandora co-creator and angel investor Tom Conrad,…

View on Google+

Mutants vs Inhumans! FIGHT!

Supposedly Ike Perlmutter is supposed to be the mad / financial genius behind deemphasizing the properties that Marvel doesn't have movie rights to, which tells me much of what I need to know about any artistic merit in the idea.

That said, the chance to prune the X-universe back a bit from the cruft it's accumulated over the last three decades is not necessarily a bad idea, regardless of the strategic motivation.

The pages shown in the article don't strike me as particularly well-written, though. Given that "mutants" and "inhumans" both tend to look outre to humans, why are only mutants being persecuted? What's the time frame in which this whole "mutants are now sterile" idea is coming from? Since when are mutants primarily being born of … well, mutants, vs from, you know, being mutations from normal human stock? Further, what does "mutants are sterile" really mean, given how genetics work and that we are all mutants in some fashion.

But I digress. Conceptually the idea that the mutant population is under existential siege in some way is neither radically new nor all that disturbing, and has the potential to be a good thing, just as it was in previous outings.

Like most things, I guess we'll see. If the stories backing up this new ostensible strategy are good ones, then I'll be happy. If it really plays like marketing-fobbed-off-as-art, it will be an opportunity to reduce my comic book budget. Win-win either way.

Originally shared by +Les Jenkins:

I can't blame them. They're going to have a lot riding on The Inhumans movie when it arrives so I'd expect they'd try to make them front and center.




Inhumans Killing X-Men in the Comics
A new Marvel Comics storyline has the Inhumans killing X-Men. Is this a response to the rivalry between Marvel Studios and 20th Century Fox?

View on Google+

Hollywood throws a fit over Fair Use in the Trans-Pacific Pact

While giving lip service to accepting and even loving Fair Use provisions of US Copyright Law (which lets someone show, for example, a still photo from a movie in a review of said movie without paying or getting permission from the movie owner), word that the US Trade Representative is considering expanding the watered-down and voluntary Fair Use provisions in the TPP is giving the MPAA and their media brethren conniptions.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/08/will-hollywoods-whining-thwart-better-tpp-copyright-rules

As the EFF (and others) have pointed out, it's also interesting (if a bit disheartening) that this change in the USTR's attitude on the Fair Use bits of the TPP had nothing to do with various public interest groups that have been lobbying about it all along, but appears to be a response to major US corporate interests outside of Hollywood (Google, et al.) weighing in on the matter.

 

View on Google+

Our Lady of Perpetual Exemption

The televangelist thieves of the modern era are no different from the John Tetzels of the past — though Indulgence peddlers like Tetzel (Tetzel!) only promised salvation in the afterlife, not prosperity in this.

That said, I can understand the IRS' reluctance to challenge churches per se. One man's faith is another man's belly laugh (or outrage), and trying to impose some sort of orthodoxy on the breadth of religious belief would be far too easy to be used as a weapon (as history teaches us, bloodily, over and over).

Prosperity Gospel "Send Us Your Seed Money" yahoos will, I trust, face the music (thinking "Night on Bald Mountain" here) once they shake off this mortal coil, but, in the meantime, they are a too real justification for stripping churches of tax exemption as a general policy. Which would, sadly, impact a lot of churches who actually do a lot of good in society, but this sort of thing is just sickening.

View on Google+

Dark Things Cannot Stand the Light (Trade Treaty Edition)

So I understand the difficulty of negotiating under a spotlight, but transparency is not a binary state. Popular micromanagement of treaty conferences would be unrealistic, but the blackout curtains being imposed over TTIP and other international trade treaties, explicitly to avoid public leaks and, thus, controversy, is in direct opposition to democratic principles, or even to the idea of representative democracy (if you don't know what important stuff your representatives are doing, you can't judge if they are representing you).

Originally shared by +Les Jenkins:

This should worry you.




Politicians can only view secret trade pact in special viewing room | Ars Technica
Resistance to pact grows as negotiators in US, EU remain tight-lipped.

View on Google+