https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

With Whom Do I Side? (Election 2016 in 2015 Edition)

So I've seen lots of folk posting the bottom line of their "ISideWith" presidential campaign survey, enough that I felt I had to do it, too.

I don't plan on getting heavily invested into any of this until we get closer to my own state's primaries, and to the actual elections themselves. At this point, with all the posturing and positioning, it's not all that meaningful. (It's also based on public statements on policy positions, not on actual actions while in office, so that's always an important caveat.)

That said …

My overall results are here: http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1318285081

"I side with Bernie Sanders on most 2016 Presidential Election Issues"

My numbers, based on responses to weighted issues, are 92% Sanders, 88% Clinton, 85% Biden, 73% Martin O'Malley.

Then come the GOP candidates, starting at 25% for Bush and going down from there (with no agreement with any of them on any major issue).

In the issue areas that were More Important to me, I sided with Sanders on Social Issues, Clinton on Domestic Policy, and nobody on Electoral Policy.

In the issue areas that were Somewhat Important to me, I sided with Sanders on Environment, Economy, and Health Care; with Clinton on Education and Foreign Policy.

On the issue area that was Less Important to me (Immigration Policy), apparently I align most with … Bobbie Jindal?

My Ideology came out as 'Your political beliefs would be considered strongly Left-Wing and moderately Authoritarian on an ideological scale, meaning you tend to stand up and protect those who are oppressed or taken advantage of and believe the government should do the same.' Hmmm. I really don't think of myself as authoritarian, but it would be an interesting discussion.

Overall, my responses don't resonate well compared to my city, the rest of my state, or even the country. Ah, well. I already sort of knew that.

All that said, I don't see myself voting for Bernie Sanders at this point. My biggest priority is to keep any of the current GOP candidates out of the Oval Office in 2016; at this point, Hillary Clinton (who I apparently also align reasonably with, at least on paper*) seems most likely to do that. Should that change, I'll reconsider.

It's worth noting that there are a lot of areas with which I disagree with Clinton, most of which come back to her untoward alignment with what are traditionally called "monied interests". That, alas, afflicts many Democrats, and most Republicans as well. I'm also not all that fond of her public persona, or her clear pandering to interest groups willing to give her money or support.

That said, there's not a single GOP candidate who I could vote for in good conscience, esp. given the way so many of them have been pandering to the religious zanies and nativists and reactionaries in the GOP, the ones who have been pushing Trump up in the polls. It's not clear how many of them believe some of the stuff they have been spouting, but that they're willing to try to go toe-to-toe with Trump (and Cruz) in fringe politics tells me what I need to know about their character, too.

Check out your results at http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential-quiz

 

View on Google+

What Mythical Creature Are You?

I, evidently, am a unicorn.

Droll comments will lead to a good swift kick. Or worse.




My result is: You’re a Unicorn. What is yours?
Much like the Unicorn, you’re known for being kind and pure at heart. You’re incredibly empathetic and charitable to all you encounter, making you a pretty popular person. Sometimes people underestimate you, but you have a fierce, brave side that will emerge when those you love are in danger.

View on Google+

I guess this confirms I'm the good one

Though I do have a beard.




How to Tell the Difference Between Evil Parallel-Universe You and the Real You
When the Large Hadron Collider is switched to its highest setting today some scientists believe it may uncover mini-black holes, a sign of parallel universes. So before a sinister, goateed version …

View on Google+

A Grammar Day Quiz

Not surprisingly, I got a pretty high intense score on this one.

http://www.grammarly.com/blog/2015/celebrate-grammar-day-with-this-fun-quiz/

"You may drive your friends and family nuts, but you would make Strunk and White proud. You love enforcing rules just about as much as you love the rules themselves. For you, grammar truly is one of life's greatest joys."

I actually didn't go full-bore on some of the questions; I'm mellowing out a bit regarding the evolution of the language, at least when it's a reasonably orderly evolution …

#NationalGrammarDay

 

View on Google+

Discover your Batman name!

I'm Batman!

(h/t +Kay Hill)

Originally shared by +Jenifer the Turtle Queen:

Gasps I'm Batman

 

View on Google+

Some global results on that recent book meme

Yesterday, I blogged about ten meaningful / memorable / impactful books in my life (https://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2014/09/09/tagged-for-ten-books.html), having been tagged for it by +DeAnna Knippling.

Apparently this meme's been floating around a bit, and Facebook did some analytics on the results, published a few days ago. Here are the top 20:

1. Harry Potter series – J.K. Rowling
2. To Kill a Mockingbird – Harper Lee
3. The Lord of the Rings – JRR Tolkien
4. The Hobbit – JRR Tolkien
5. Pride and Prejudice – Jane Austen
6. The Holy Bible
7. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy – Douglas Adams
8. The Hunger Games Trilogy – Suzanne Collins
9. The Catcher in the Rye – J.D. Salinger
10. The Chronicles of Narnia – C.S. Lewis
11. The Great Gatsby – F. Scott Fitzgerald
12. 1984 – George Orwell
13. Little Women – Louisa May Alcott
14. Jane Eyre – Charlotte Bronte
15. The Stand – Stephen King
16. Gone with the Wind – Margaret Mitchell
17. A Wrinkle in Time – Madeleine L'Engle
18. The Handmaid's Tale – Margaret Atwood
19. The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe – C.S. Lewis
20. The Alchemist – Paulo Coelho

There are a surprisingly large number of "classics" on the list. Three of the ones I picked (Lord of the Rings, 1984, the Bible) showed up here.

It's also indicative of some of the data clustering issues FB had — in this case, despite supposedly aggregating series, they still listed out The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardobe and The Chronicles of Narnia separately.

There are some other fun analytics they've done, including proximity maps (people who liked X also tended to like Y) and connections between people doing the meme, as well as the full top 100 list (I'm vaguely pleased that none of them made me kick myself for forgetting that one). Good stuff.




Books that have stayed with us
by Lada Adamic and Pinkesh Patel. Favorite books are something friends like to share and discuss. A Facebook meme facilitates this very interaction. You may have seen one of your friends post something like “List 10 books that have stayed with you in some way. Don’t take more than a few minutes, …

View on Google+

Tagged for Ten Books

Over on That Other Social Network (at http://goo.gl/ZLnEKC), +DeAnna Knippling tagged me for a meme to list "10 books that have stayed with me, changed my life, or were for other reasons memorable."

In no particular order …

1. The Lord of the Rings (Tolkien) – For a book that took me three years of reading the first hundred pages before finally breaking out of the Shire and into the good stuff, I eventually dove in and didn't come up for air for another decade or more. I did maps. I did calendars. I did Quenya and Sindarin vocabulary lists. I stole shamelessly for my D&D campaigns. And to this day, all the flaws in Peter Jackson's epic action adaptations still melt before the sheer giddiness of seeing something that approximates Prof. Tolkien's fantastic world.

2. The Zero Stone (Norton) – Norton's "juveniles" were not only deeply human (so to speak), but also taught me a lot about slowly building a shared world just through terminology and props.

3. The Bible (Anthology) – I'm not noting it here because it saved my soul or something, but because it informed me about my faith, its roots and conflicts and inconsistencies and its content. The Bible is also a cultural touchstone — while you can't casually mention Balaam's Ass any more and have people know what you're talking about, a lot of our metaphors and references and literary imagery — as well as societal norms — derive from the Bible and its various translations. It should be required reading for everyone, not for its religious content but because of its effect on culture, history, and literature.

4. Mere Christianity (Lewis) – While I've fallen out of love with Lewis since discovering his apologetics once upon a time, there's still a lot worthwhile for Christians in his writings, including the idea that you can actually think about your faith, not just passively accept the stories.

5. 1984 (Orwell) – Made me very aware of totalitarianism and the importance of information, language, and thought control. That different aspects of it keep rising to the surface of the news, 65 years later, speaks to its strengths.

6. Operation: Chaos (Anderson) – My introduction to "urban fantasy" decades before anyone actually coined the phrase, as well as featuring a great husband and wife pair of protagonists. I still pull this out and read it every several years.

7. Julius Caesar (Shakespeare) – My intro to Shakespeare, wherein I learned to love what he did with the language, and with history, and I also learned the importance of a good sales pitch.

8. The Stainless Steel Rat (Harrison) – Capers! Scams! Yeah, I'd grown up watching old "Mission: Impossible" reruns, but I had no idea that you could do that sort of thing in a science fiction novel, let alone with such a charming anti-hero as "Slipper Jim" DiGriz. Harrison sort of ran the franchise into the ground, but there was a joie de vivre in the protag here that I never forgot.

9. Searching for Rachel Wallace (Parker) – Wait, I could enjoy a genre besides SF and Fantasy? Inconceivable! Parker's Spenser was my entre into hard-bitten detective tales, the "tarnished white knight," bruiser and intellectual, who saves the innocent (or damn well tries), gets beat up a lot, and bears guilt for his perceived failings.

10. A Wrinkle in Time (L'Engle) – This story is more "magical" than would normally be to my taste, but both the scenes on Earth and (even more) the scenes on Camazotz resonated with me when I first read it, and still do today.

HONORABLE MENTIONS:

11. The Puppet Masters (Heinlein) – This, along with Methuselah's Children, came at a time when Heinlein was writing ripping and thought-provoking SF with just enough polemic to be interesting. That polemic, which tends to choke his later novels (as vastly entertaining as they are) taught me both some interesting social and political ideas, as well as some cautionary notes in my own writing.

12. The Caves of Steel (Asimov) – A mediocre mystery, a good "buddy flick" cop partners tale, but a fantastic and memorable setting in the domed City of New York.

13. Children of the Night (Lackey) – My intro to paranormal romance (though it wasn't called that then) as well as modern urban fantasy vampires and witches. My favorite of the three Diana Tregarde tales. They haven't aged well, but the influenced a lot of my reading (and some of my writing) thereafter.

I'm not going to specifically tag anyone for this, because I'm not that kind of guy. But I will say there are a number of my regular correspondents I'd be interested in hearing from.

 

View on Google+

Choosing a Super Power

1. I'd take any of these, honestly.

2. If offered a choice I would feel morally obligated to take Pink and then find work in an ER.

3. Outside that moral obligation, I'd probably select Yellow (because telepathy is cool) or Grey (because I'm lazy).

4. I would rather not choose Blue or Orange without also being able to choose Red.

Reshared post from +Blain Willis

If you were to create a comic hero/villain which power would you give him/her? Please select a button

Talking Points

It's rather disturbing that the quiz accurately identified, as two cities where the talk like I do, Denver and Aurora.  (Minneapolis was the other one.)  Least similar cities are Montgomery, AL; Winston-Salem, NC; and Philadelphia, PA.

How Y’all, Youse and You Guys Talk

That's not geekery, it's efficiency!

That's how I try to do deliverables for people, esp. when they are deliverables (a) I expect to have to repeat, or (b) that I expect to receive a revised set of requirements for. #ddtb

Reshared post from +Bruno Oliveira

Geeks vs Nerds

Hrm. Based on this, I am 85% Nerd, 15% Geek.

(via http://www.mastersinit.org/geeks-vs-nerds/) #ddtb

Am I a Democrat or a Republican? Let’s ask the TV!

Entertainment Weekly did some studying of partisan preferences in TV watching (through Experian-Simmons) — you know, the “Republicans like X, while Democrats rate Y as better.”  So it stands to reason, if their in-depth scholarly conclusions are accurate, I should be able to predict my political party from what TV I like to watch.

Let’s go to film …

In the findings, “sarcastic” media-savvy comedies and morally murky antiheroes tend to draw Dems. While serious work-centered shows (both reality shows and stylized scripted procedurals), along with reality competitions, tend to draw conservatives.

Well, I do like The Daily Show and Colbert Report.  Patrick Jayne (The Mentalist) is arguably a morally murky anti-hero, as are the protagonists on Leverage.

On other hand, I love Law & Order (US or UK), which is certainly a “stylized scripted procedural.”  There are some reality shows (around home improvement) and reality competitions (Iron Chef, etc.) I enjoy watching.

Maybe we better go to specifics from the article noting shows in particular that I like or dislike:

LIBERAL-DEMOCRAT FAVORITES:

  • The Daily Show With Jon Stewart and The Colbert Report (Comedy Central): Well, of course. As you might expect.
  • 30 Rock and Parks and Recreation (NBC): I don’t watch comedies.
  • The View (ABC): While “shows that skew female tend to do better among Dems,” I really don’t like The View (or any talk show of that sort).
  • Glee (Fox) – Never watched it. Never had the desire to.
  • Modern Family (ABC): Never watched it. Never had the desire to.
  • It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia (FX): Never heard of it.
  • Treme (HBO): I don’t watch HBO.  We don’t subscribe to HBO. Reading about it, I have no desire to watch it.
  • Cougar Town (ABC): Um, seriously no desire to watch.
  • The Late Show With David Letterman and The Late Late Show With Craig Ferguson(CBS): Though “Dems favor late-night programming” I don’t. I’ve never cared for late night variety/talk shows, and generally find them a very weak bang for the buck.
  • Also in the mix: The Soup (E!), Aqua Teen Hunger Force (Adult Swim), Raising Hope (Fox),Saturday Night Live (NBC), The Office (NBC), Project Runway (Lifetime), Shameless (Showtime), Parenthood (NBC), Conan (TBS): Even the one here I have, on occasion, watched (SNL) is nothing I bother to record or go out of my way for; I probably haven’t seen it live in a decade.

CONSERVATIVE-REPUBLICAN FAVORITES:

  • Swamp Loggers (Discovery) and Top Shot (History): It seems “gritty documentary-style work-related reality shows on cable index really strongly with conservative Republicans.” They really don’t with me.
  • The Bachelor (ABC): I loathe this show, its concept, its execution, its very existence. They also tend to gravitate toward broadcast reality competition shows.
  • Castle (ABC): Whew! This also “ranks fairly high among Dems, too.”
  • Mythbusters (Discovery): Huh. Well, I enjoy it.
  • Only in America With Larry the Cable GuyAmerican PickersPawn StarsSwamp People (History): I haven’t watched the History Channel since it stopped being about History.
  • The Middle (ABC): Though this  “does well among libs, too,” I’ve never watched it.  Or heard of it.
  • The Tonight Show With Jay Leno (NBC): See same response to the Liberal late-night shows …
  • The Biggest Loser (NBC): See The Bachelor.
  • Hawaii Five-O, NCIS, The Mentalist (CBS): I already commented on The Mentalist above.  My perverse fondness for Five-0 is discussed elseblog.
  • Also: Dancing With the Stars results show (ABC), Man vs. Wild (Discovery), Auction Kings(Discovery), Wheel of Fortune (syndi), Top Gear (BBC America).

So those are the preferences — how about the averse?

CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN LEAST FAVORITES:

  • Weeds (Showtime): Well, we don’t have Showtime, either, and no particular desire to.
  • The Daily Show With Jon Stewart and The Colbert Report(Comedy Central)
  • South Park (Comedy Central): I’ve never found it nearly as witty as it pretends to be.
  • TMZ (syndication)
  • General Hospital (ABC)
  • Family Guy (Fox): I feel mixed over this one — there are large chunks of the humor I like, but I’m just not a fan (and don’t watch it at all regularly).
  • Dexter (Showtime):  I thought it was good, not great (watched on DVD).
  • Jersey Shore (MTV): Everything I have seem about this show seems like nothing I’d want to actually watch.
  • The Walking Dead (AMC):  Good show.  But not something we watch.
  • Also: Divorce Court (syndi), The Big C (Showtime), Let’s Make a Deal (CBS), Bridezillas(WE), My Fair Wedding With David Tutera (WE), Don’t Forget the Lyrics (VH1).

LIBERAL DEMOCRAT LEAST FAVORITES:

  • Swamp Loggers (Discovery)
  • Dog the Bounty Hunter (A&E) and COPS (syndication): I find Dog to be an awful person.  I find the “slice of life” in COPS, though, to be fascinating, and an interesting look at some aspects of being part of the police.
  • The Ultimate Fighter (Spike TV)
  • The Price Is Right (CBS)
  • CSI: Miami (CBS): I don’t watch it at all regularly, but the eps I’ve watched I’ve enjoyed.
  • Kitchen Nightmares (Fox): I’ve never watched this on Fox, just on various food channels.  Is it the same, with Ramsay?
  • Secret Life of the American Teenager (ABC Family)
  • Ghost Hunters (Syfy), Ghost Adventures (Travel Channel) and The Haunted (Animal Planet): Gag me.
  • Also: Operation Repo (TruTV), Swamp People (History), Hardcore Pawn (TruTV), River Monsters (Animal Planet), Deadliest Catch (Discovery), Only in America With Larry the Cable Guy (History), Storm Chasers (Discovery), Billy the Exterminator (A&E), Deal or No Deal (GSN), Forensic Files (TruTV), Dirty Jobs (Discovery).

So the answer is …

… well, I don’t seem to be much of anything.  Or I don’t watch nearly enough TV. Or … something.

(via Les)

Navigating by the Political Compass

I’ve taken the Political Compass test several times over the last decade. This is a test to gauge your political stand along two axes: economically left/right (think of it as collectivist / communist  vs free market / neo-liberal / laissez faire) and politically (authoritarian / fascist  vs libertarian / anarchist).

The idea behind the test is that the normal binary axis (left/right, liberal/conservative) is not sufficient to encompass both social/market ends and governmental means.  As the site notes, both Stalin and Ghandi were leftists, but both were quite dissimilar in other significant ways. (More on the axes here; (the site recommends not studying this material  before taking the test.)

To me, as interesting as the test, is the question of how I’ve changed (or not) over the decade I’ve been doing it (as recorded on this blog). And, in fact, it’s been a few years.  So … without further ado …

The scores are typically given as (economic, social)

12/2001:  -1.13, -3.13
5/2003: -2.13, -3.54
8/2004: -0.75, -3.13
7/2007: -3.00, -4.00
11/2011: -6.12, -4.82

The  red dot is my current score, based on taking the test tonight.  I’ve inserted my scores from the previous tests onto the chart.

It’s interesting to me, though not surprising, that while I’ve edged south a little bit toward a more civil libertarian view (as issues of homeland security and governmental control have loomed on one hand, and imposition of religious and/or corporate authoritarianism have loomed on the other), my biggest change in the last four years has been on the economic front.

For that I “blame” a combination of the current OWS unrest in the news, the business-inflicted economic crisis of the past few years, and the growing political power of the über-wealthy and the corporations.  Even just reading those words I wrote feels odd, because I remain in favor of business competition and innovation as great rules of thumb for a successful economy.  My concern / shift stems more from where I see corporate power stifling not just competition and innovation, but strangling our very political system, our environment, and our society.

A free market is not an end to itself.  It’s a powerfully useful means to that end, but when free markets turn into Darwinian oligarchies, something’s broken in the system.

And, no, for the record, I don’t plan on starting to wear a Che shirt, or handing out copies of Mao’s Little Red Book, or other stuff of that sort.  Nor do I plan to move to a commune, or quit my job and join the OWS protests. Nor do I hate America, nor do I hate Jesus, nor do I think a centrally controlled economy is a great idea. I do think that restrictions on the sizes and influence of corporations, and attention to how they help or hurt not just their shareholders but the society in which they operate and profit, are all worthwhile elements to a healthy nation.  And while I encourage personal responsibility, I feel we also need to understand that sometimes shit happens, and we have a communal responsibility, both moral and pragmatic, to see that those who are hungry are fed, those who are sick are treated, etc.

Here’s one of those cases where I’d love to sit down with the me of a decade ago and discuss our differences.

The 100 Top SF/Fantasy?

Well, the most popular 100 SF/Fantasy books that 60,000-odd NPR listeners chose. Which isn’t, of course, the same things.

And which have I read?

1. The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy, by J.R.R. Tolkien

2. The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy, by Douglas Adams

3. Ender’s Game, by Orson Scott Card

4. The Dune Chronicles, by Frank Herbert [I read Dune, and that was enough for me.]

5. A Song Of Ice And Fire Series, by George R. R. Martin

6. 1984, by George Orwell

7. Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury

8. The Foundation Trilogy, by Isaac Asimov

9. Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley

10. American Gods, by Neil Gaiman

11. The Princess Bride, by William Goldman

12. The Wheel Of Time Series, by Robert Jordan

13. Animal Farm, by George Orwell

14. Neuromancer, by William Gibson

15. Watchmen, by Alan Moore

16. I, Robot, by Isaac Asimov

17. Stranger In A Strange Land, by Robert Heinlein

18. The Kingkiller Chronicles, by Patrick Rothfuss

19. Slaughterhouse-Five, by Kurt Vonnegut

20. Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley

21. Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?, by Philip K. Dick

22. The Handmaid’s Tale, by Margaret Atwood

23. The Dark Tower Series, by Stephen King [I read the first one.]

24. 2001: A Space Odyssey, by Arthur C. Clarke

25. The Stand, by Stephen King

26. Snow Crash, by Neal Stephenson

27. The Martian Chronicles, by Ray Bradbury

28. Cat’s Cradle, by Kurt Vonnegut

29. The Sandman Series, by Neil Gaiman

30. A Clockwork Orange, by Anthony Burgess

31. Starship Troopers, by Robert Heinlein

32. Watership Down, by Richard Adams

33. Dragonflight, by Anne McCaffrey

34. The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress, by Robert Heinlein

35. A Canticle For Leibowitz, by Walter M. Miller

36. The Time Machine, by H.G. Wells

37. 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea, by Jules Verne

38. Flowers For Algernon, by Daniel Keys

39. The War Of The Worlds, by H.G. Wells

40. The Chronicles Of Amber, by Roger Zelazny

41. The Belgariad, by David Eddings

42. The Mists Of Avalon, by Marion Zimmer Bradley

43. The Mistborn Series, by Brandon Sanderson

44. Ringworld, by Larry Niven

45. The Left Hand Of Darkness, by Ursula K. LeGuin

46. The Silmarillion, by J.R.R. Tolkien

47. The Once And Future King, by T.H. White

48. Neverwhere, by Neil Gaiman

49. Childhood’s End, by Arthur C. Clarke

50. Contact, by Carl Sagan

51. The Hyperion Cantos, by Dan Simmons

52. Stardust, by Neil Gaiman

53. Cryptonomicon, by Neal Stephenson

54. World War Z, by Max Brooks

55. The Last Unicorn, by Peter S. Beagle

56. The Forever War, by Joe Haldeman

57. Small Gods, by Terry Pratchett

58. The Chronicles Of Thomas Covenant, The Unbeliever, by Stephen R. Donaldson [I read the first one, and that was ll I needed.]

59. The Vorkosigan Saga, by Lois McMaster Bujold [I’ve read a few]

60. Going Postal, by Terry Pratchett

61. The Mote In God’s Eye, by Larry Niven & Jerry Pournelle

62. The Sword Of Truth, by Terry Goodkind

63. The Road, by Cormac McCarthy

64. Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, by Susanna Clarke

65. I Am Legend, by Richard Matheson

66. The Riftwar Saga, by Raymond E. Feist

67. The Shannara Trilogy, by Terry Brooks [I read The Sword of Shannara, then went back and read LotR to wash my brain out.]

68. The Conan The Barbarian Series, by R.E. Howard

69. The Farseer Trilogy, by Robin Hobb

70. The Time Traveler’s Wife, by Audrey Niffenegger

71. The Way Of Kings, by Brandon Sanderson

72. A Journey To The Center Of The Earth, by Jules Verne

73. The Legend Of Drizzt Series, by R.A. Salvatore

74. Old Man’s War, by John Scalzi

75. The Diamond Age, by Neil Stephenson

76. Rendezvous With Rama, by Arthur C. Clarke

77. The Kushiel’s Legacy Series, by Jacqueline Carey

78. The Dispossessed, by Ursula K. LeGuin

79. Something Wicked This Way Comes, by Ray Bradbury

80. Wicked, by Gregory Maguire

81. The Malazan Book Of The Fallen Series, by Steven Erikson

82. The Eyre Affair, by Jasper Fforde

83. The Culture Series, by Iain M. Banks

84. The Crystal Cave, by Mary Stewart

85. Anathem, by Neal Stephenson

86. The Codex Alera Series, by Jim Butcher

87. The Book Of The New Sun, by Gene Wolfe

88. The Thrawn Trilogy, by Timothy Zahn

89. The Outlander Series, by Diana Gabaldan

90. The Elric Saga, by Michael Moorcock

91. The Illustrated Man, by Ray Bradbury

92. Sunshine, by Robin McKinley

93. A Fire Upon The Deep, by Vernor Vinge

94. The Caves Of Steel, by Isaac Asimov [It’s fascinating what the editors chose to group as a “series” and what they left as stand-alone books.]

95. The Mars Trilogy, by Kim Stanley Robinson

96. Lucifer’s Hammer, by Larry Niven & Jerry Pournelle

97. Doomsday Book, by Connie Willis

98. Perdido Street Station, by China Mieville

99. The Xanth Series, by Piers Anthony [I read several, but gave up on them years ago.  Does that count?]

100. The Space Trilogy, by C.S. Lewis

So, actually more than I’d expected, esp. if you consider the partials.  Of course, the list is goofy in the extreme (mixing and matching SF and Fantasy … but leaving out what they considered YA, such as Earthsea and Narnia and Harry Potter, plus, as a popularity contest, the mix of classics and the past few years’ hot properties, with 4 of the top 20 being from the last decade), but, then, these sorts of lists are more to engender conversation than any actual wisdom.

Unblogged Bits (Thu. 13-Jan-11 2230)

Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries ….

  1. Life Without Left Turns | Surprising Science – Um, wouldn’t roundabouts be another way to address this?
  2. Harry Potter villain FINALLY allowed to tan after 10-year ban | Blastr – The down side of being in an wildly successful film franchise.
  3. Stingray Nebula
  4. AFA Blog: It’s Not Genocide If God Tells You To Do It – Well at least they’ve chosen a refreshingly open way to address some of the horrors in the Old Testament. Yeesh.
  5. Wiley Drake Focuses His Imprecatory Prayers On Fred Phelps – Man, I hate it when I don’t know who to root for …
  6. Conservative Blogs Unleash More Animosity in Reaction to Obama’s Speech – Stay classy, Lunatic Right!
  7. U.S. income distribution (2010 edition) – “Most people imagine that the rich are in heaven, but, as a rule, it is only a gilded hell. There is not a man in the city of New York with genius enough, with brains enough, to own five millions of dollars. Why? The money will own him. He becomes the key to a safe. That money will get him up at daylight; that money will separate him from his friends; that money will fill his heart with fear; that money will rob his days of sunshine and his nights of pleasant dreams. He cannot own it. He becomes the property of that money. And he goes right on making more. What for? He does not know. It becomes a kind of insanity. No one is happier in a palace than in a cabin.” — Robert Green Ingersoll
  8. Individual Responsibility And Sarah Palin – Does Ms Palin speak at public and private events and on TV shows and in her never-ending chain of books because she thinks her words have no influence? That they might not change, or guide, or have an effect on the minds of her listeners? Of course not. Does she take credit when her vocal support of a candidate assists in their victory? Of course she does. There is, of course, a difference between who actually pulled the trigger and who offered up suggestions and targets and stoking up as to which direction the gun should be pointed. But that doesn’t mean the latter is absolved of any responsibility, moral if not legal. Ms Palin’s refusal to accept that is yet another indication of why she should never be elected to public office again.
  9. 1023 2011 – Homeopathy is one of those quack sciences I’ve never understood otherwise intelligent people being devotees of. Craziness.
  10. Climate change has guided 2,500 years of European history
  11. The new Zodiac – Wait … I’m a Sagittarius now? Aw, man, now I’m going to have to change my whole personality.

On Being More Plebeian Than Thou

Apparently Charles Murray in the WaPo has defined the cultural divide to identify what makes up the New Elite (vs, presumably, the Old Plebeians).  This divide is what is righteously driving the Tea Parties so mad (or, as he quotes Glenn Beck, “On one side, we have the elites, and the other side, we have the regular people.”).

Given how little I care for the TPers and Beck, I figured I’d fit squarely into the Elitist camp.

While most of it has to do with elite preppies going to elite schools, Murray gives a whole series of cultural descriptors so you know who’s truly a New Elitist:

Talk to them about sports, and you may get an animated discussion of yoga, pilates, skiing or mountain biking, but they are unlikely to know who Jimmie Johnson is (the really famous Jimmie Johnson, not the former Dallas Cowboys coach), and the acronym MMA means nothing to them.

They can talk about books endlessly, but they’ve never read a “Left Behind” novel (65 million copies sold) or a Harlequin romance (part of a genre with a core readership of 29 million Americans).

Et cetera.

Claire Berlinski then created a test — from Murray’s own criteria — so that everyone could figure out whether they are a Plebe or one of the hated Elitists.  Let’s take it and see what happens!


How Plebeian Am I?

1. Can you talk about “Mad Men?” No. I know what it’s about, but have never watched it.

2. Can you talk about the “The Sopranos?” No. I’ve only watched a few episodes, on business trips (we don’t get HBO at home).

3. Do you know who replaced Bob Barker on “The Price Is Right?” Nope.

4. Have you watched an Oprah show from beginning to end? No. I’d be surprised if I’ve watched more than 5 minutes of an Oprah show.

5. Can you hold forth animatedly about yoga? No. I took a couple quarters of yoga while in college — but not much animation about it.

6. How about pilates? I think he gets a bum rap in the Gospels, but … um, you mean the exercise regimen? I have a friend who was (is?) involved in it, but … no.

7. How about skiing? No. I went cross-country skiing a bit as a youth, but not much since. Intentionally hurtling down a mountain, and paying for the privilege, doesn’t float my boat.

8. Mountain biking? Not even street biking.

9. Do you know who Jimmie Johnson is? Nope.

10. Does the acronym MMA mean nothing to you? No. Metropolitan Museum of Art?

11. Can you talk about books endlessly? Now that I can do! Yes.

12. Have you ever read a “Left Behind” novel? Nope, but I love the “Tribulation Force” blog series that Slacktivist does on them. Endlessly amusing.

13. How about a Harlequin romance? Nope.

14. Do you take interesting vacations? Well, I find them interesting, so yes. My blogging audience has to suffer through them, too (which may explain the size of my blogging audience).

15. Do you know a great backpacking spot in the Sierra Nevada? Nope.  Never been much into backpacking. I like comforts like “mattresses” and “indoor plumbing.”

16. What about an exquisite B&B overlooking Boothbay Harbor? Where? No.

17. Would you be caught dead in an RV? Yes. I’ve both vacationed and slept in them. I could see renting one for some trips, but it’s not likely.

18. Would you be caught dead on a cruise ship? Yes. I am fairly certain we will eventually end up on a cruise ship. I have no idea if this will be horrid or lovely, and it may or may not depend on where we are cruising to.

19. Have you ever heard of of Branson, Mo? Yes. Never been there, though (which is true for most places in Missouri).

20. Have you ever attended a meeting of a Kiwanis Club? No.

21. How about the Rotary Club? Yes. I participated in several Rotary Club speech contests as a high schooler, getting up to the state level on a couple of occasions. Not my choice for spending my lunches as an adult professional, but those who like that sort of thing will find it the sort of thing they like.

22. Have you lived for at least a year in a small town? I am a child of suburbia, so, no.  Closest would be 8 mos. living in Ft Collins, Colorado.

23. Have you lived for a year in an urban neighborhood in which most of your neighbors did not have college degrees? Never lived in an urban neighborhood.

24. Have you spent at least a year with a family income less than twice the poverty line? No.

25. Do you have a close friend who is an evangelical Christian? I don’t think so. Not as has come up in conversation.  I have some acquaintances who are, though.

26. Have you ever visited a factory floor? Yes.

27. Have you worked on one? No.

My initial read was that you get “Plebe” cred for positive answers on 3, 4, 9, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27.  You get “Elite” cred for positive answers on 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16. It’s not clear if you lose cred for having a negative answer, so we’ll leave that off.

On that basis, I get 5 Plebe points, 2 Elite points.  That’s 29% Plebe, 20% Elite. So … I guess I’m a bit more Plebe than Elite, but not much of either.

Kevin Drum’s scoring mechanism is more geared to one or the other, based solely on what makes a good Plebe (e.g., not being able to talk about Mad Men makes one Plebeian, as opposed to simply not Elitist).  In that case, you get Plebe credits for negative answers on the Elite scores.  On that basis, I get 13 out of 27, or a 48% Plebe score (or, conversely, a 52% Elite score).

Is that enough to avoid the torches and pitchforks come the TPer Revolution?


(Needless to say, this — Murray’s article, specifically — is dreck of the worst kind, as the commenters at Steve Benan’s site put it most pungently. But mildly amusing, if only to see what some folks consider to be signs of Elitism, especially Harvard grads who work at libertarian think tanks.)

Twitter-pated

How addicted to Twitter are you?

Created by Oatmeal

It is perhaps indicative of my addiction (how bad is 53%, btw — I mean, if I was 53% addicted to heroin, would that be good or bad?) that most of the questions I could tell were going to bump up the score didn’t seem all that ridiculous or shameful to me.

O Striving!

So, what does Oprah! have to say about me and what I’m striving toward? 

Forget your career. Forget your role as a mother or a wife.

We’ll assume this is a unisex quiz, if not quiz intro.

Forget how much money you make or how successful you are. If you’re struggling with the question “Who am I meant to be?”, this quiz can help you figure out what really defines you. Based on personality science, I have identified seven “striving styles,” modes of thought and behavior that direct us to seek satisfaction in different ways. Although everybody is wired with all seven styles, most people have one that dominates. When you engage this innate style, you’ve got the best shot at fulfilling your potential; when you don’t, you can feel stuck.

After responding to the statements below, you will discover your striving style, learn what to do if it’s backfiring from neglect, and find ideas to guide your life in the direction that it was meant to go

Woot! Guidance for my life! And the results?

YOU ARE STRIVING TO BE SECURE
You are a stabilizer: You are the rock in a storm, the one others lean on. Loyal and committed in your relationships, you maintain a support system of like-minded people whom you look out for. (So what if you do it behind the scenes and don’t get credit?) You’re careful with money, cherish the familiar, and defend the traditions you care about.

What to watch out for: Rapidly changing environments (like a shaky economy) are very hard for you. As a result of such instability, you can spiral into a state where everything seems catastrophic and you’re sure life will only get worse. You can also become overcontrolling, rejecting any suggestion that doesn’t conform to your idea of the way things should be. To avoid being too rigid, each month try changing one habit. Experiment with clothes, drive a different way to work, initiate conversations about subjects you wouldn’t normally discuss. And when the opportunity arises to do something new, avoid the impulse to immediately say no—this may be nerve-racking, but the more you practice, the less anxious you’ll feel.

Looking ahead: You find meaning in pursuing safety and certainty. Focusing on family can give you great satisfaction. Also consider planting a vegetable garden, hosting class reunions, volunteering as a lifeguard, teaching at your church or temple. In the work arena, look for positions where you’re responsible for others, and for making sure everyone is following the rules. You work well in any environment that is stable and consistent. Careers in government, finance, the military, law enforcement, and product manufacturing are strong options for you.

In other words, I’m stodgy, looking for consistency and standards, but also looking out to take care of people. Um … yeah. Pretty much.

Except I would rather eat a bug than sponsor a class reunion. Just saying.

YOUR SCORES
Many people have two or three strong striving styles, and they can all be important in leading you to the person you are meant to be. If you have a few “highest” scores, read each matching description, and see what rings most true.

Striving to help: 12
Striving to be recognized: 15
Striving to be creative: 15
Striving to be spontaneous: 12
Striving to be knowledgeable: 16
Striving to be secure: 17
Striving to be in control: 16

Actually, it’s interesting that I’m relatively “balanced” in the scores here. Maybe it just means I’m needy/striving across a lot of levels. 🙂 Nobody who knows me will be surprised that one of the lowest scores was in striving to be “spontaneous,” but I am a bit surprised that “help” was so low.

(via OGLO)

I am Table, hear me roar!

Some assembly required.

Order now, and get $0.50 off of the Swedish Meatballs at our in-store cafe … yum!

Words mean … things?

three_star_dave is 39% Hetero 

How hetero are you? How hetero is Martha Stewart? Try out any Twitter name and get the real picture. Are we really the words we use? Hope to see you at Stockholm Pride!

According to Stockholm Pride, my Twitter feed tells something about my heterosexuality. I think. Since I used the words bits, orlando, clueless, cocktail, and community, I am, um, “39% Hetero.” Is that the same as “51% Homo,” or is it counted as an offset from the center, or what? I’m so confused. Well, confused about this test, not confused about that.

Your’re a bit retro hetero. Take care of your hetero memories, they’re as important to you as the flannel shirt was to the grunge.

Ah, those wacky gay Swedes. I suspect if I lived in Sweden, I’d wear more flannel shirts. And it wouldn’t have anything to do with grunge. Or with my hetero memories.