{"id":10291,"date":"2007-02-22T20:48:14","date_gmt":"2007-02-23T03:48:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/2007\/02\/22\/when-you-absolutely-positively-need-to-get-the-right-wing-truth.html"},"modified":"2007-02-22T20:48:14","modified_gmt":"2007-02-23T03:48:14","slug":"when_you_absolutely_posit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2007\/02\/22\/when_you_absolutely_posit.html","title":{"rendered":"When you absolutely, positively need to get the right-wing truth"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Presenting &#8230; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.conservapedia.com\/Main_Page\" target=\"_blank\">Conservapedia<\/a>!<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to <a title=\"Wikipedia\" href=\"http:\/\/www.conservapedia.com\/Wikipedia\">Wikipedia<\/a>, which is increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American. On Wikipedia, many of the dates are provided in the anti-Christian &#8220;C.E.&#8221; instead of &#8220;A.D.&#8221;, which Conservapedia uses. Christianity receives no credit for the great advances and discoveries it inspired, such as those of the Renaissance. Read a list of many <a title=\"Examples of Bias in Wikipedia\" href=\"http:\/\/www.conservapedia.com\/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia\">Examples<br \/>\nof Bias in Wikipedia<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>Conservapedia is an online resource and meeting place where we favor Christianity and America. Conservapedia has easy-to-use indexes to facilitate review of topics. You will much prefer using Conservapedia compared to Wikipedia if you want concise answers free of &#8220;political correctness&#8221;. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Oh.  My.<\/p>\n<p>Among those examples of &#8220;bias&#8221; are:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\nThe use of BCE\/CE instead of BC\/AD.  Now, I prefer the latter, too, for traditional purposes.  But this isn&#8217;t &#8220;anti-Christianity,&#8221; it&#8217;s an attempt to be non-religious (which, believe or not, is not the same thing).  Further, the charge is not that Wikipedia <em>forces<\/em> the BCE\/CE standard (the way Conservapedia forces BC\/AD in its &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.conservapedia.com\/The_Conservapedia_Commandments\" target=\"_blank\">Commandments<\/a>&#8220;), but that it &#8220;<em>allows<\/em>&#8221; it.  Egads! <\/li>\n<li>\nWikipedia &#8220;allows&#8221; various British\/non-American spellings in various topics, &#8220;even though most English speaking users are American,&#8221;  Those damn Limey-loving bastards! <\/li>\n<li>\nWikipedia doesn&#8217;t have a conservative bias, and actually emphasizes evolution, &#8220;even though most Americans (and probably most of the world) reject the theory of <a title=\"Evolution\" href=\"http:\/\/www.conservapedia.com\/Evolution\">evolution<\/a>.&#8221;  Most of the objections are that Wikipedia is biased because it doesn&#8217;t include conservatively biased sources.<\/li>\n<li>\nWikipedia has lots of trivial entries and errors, and only relies on the contributing public (instead of Accepted Authorities) to correct it.  Loosey-goosey elitists!<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Or, to quote Conservapedia&#8217;s entry on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.conservapedia.com\/Wikipedia\" target=\"_blank\">Wikipedia<\/a> &#8230;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The administrators who monitor and control the content on Wikipedia do not represent the views of the majority of Americans, and many are in fact not American. For example, only 10% of Americans accept evolution as it is taught in public school, yet many Wikipedia administrators accept it as a sourced fact, and will censor material that contradicts evolution.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Conservapedia sure seems a lot more interested in ideological correctness (&#8220;we favor Christianity and America&#8221;) than in actually dealing with <em>facts<\/em>, and in tearing down Wikipedia than in demonstrating that it&#8217;s a reliable source of information.  Yeesh.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><small><br \/>\n<\/small><\/p>\n<p>(via <a href=\"http:\/\/stupidevilbastard.com\/index\/seb\/comments\/more_proof_that_right_wingers_arent_even_trying_anymore\/\" target=\"_blank\">SEB<\/a>)<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Presenting &#8230; Conservapedia! Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which is increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American. On Wikipedia, many of the dates are provided in the anti-Christian &#8220;C.E.&#8221; instead of&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10291","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-zt-pc"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":23044,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2011\/10\/10\/unblogged-bits-mon-10-oct-11-2330.html","url_meta":{"origin":10291,"position":0},"title":"Unblogged Bits (Mon. 10-Oct-11 2330)","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 10-Oct-11 11:30pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries .... But what do they want? - Pretty much. It\u2019s Anti-Flat-Earth Day, and Conservapedia Still Thinks the Theory of Relativity Is a Liberal Plot - Yeah, head asploding over here. Denver cop gets deferred sentence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Potpourri&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Potpourri","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/potpourri"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":16515,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2010\/01\/09\/unblogged-bits-for-saturday-09-january-2010.html","url_meta":{"origin":10291,"position":1},"title":"Unblogged Bits for Saturday, 09 January 2010","author":"***Dave","date":"Sat 9-Jan-10 5:00pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries .... On prosecutions, a few numbers for you | Michael Tomasky | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk - Oh, this is excellent. Looking at the Bush years, it appears that civil prosecutions for terrorism were\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Potpourri&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Potpourri","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/potpourri"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":16018,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2009\/10\/15\/we-dont-need-another-hero-says-the-gop.html","url_meta":{"origin":10291,"position":2},"title":"We Don&#8217;t Need Another Hero (says the GOP)","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 15-Oct-09 12:45am","format":false,"excerpt":"The new GOP website has a page (or two) lauding GOP heroes. Blue Texan suggests that quite a few of these might not consider themselves Republican heroes -- or wouldn't be heroes by the lights of today's Republican party if they did now what they did then. Susan B. Anthony:\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Politics &amp; Law&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Politics &amp; Law","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/politics-law"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":16009,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2009\/10\/14\/great-achievements-in-republican-history.html","url_meta":{"origin":10291,"position":3},"title":"Great Achievements in Republican History!","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 14-Oct-09 12:15pm","format":false,"excerpt":"The GOP's new website has a special page for GOP \"Accomplishments\" across history (interestingly, the page title is \"Political News: American Achievements: Political Achievements\"). Let's start in relatively modern history, as the fact is that neither party is what it was before, say, the Great Depression. Neither is America. 1938\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;History&quot;","block_context":{"text":"History","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/history"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/10\/gop.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":10859,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2007\/06\/11\/wikipedia.html","url_meta":{"origin":10291,"position":4},"title":"Wikipedia","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 11-Jun-07 3:05pm","format":false,"excerpt":"I love Wikipedia. Discounting folks with a vested interest in badmouthing Wikipedia, the site\/organization\/system\u00a0gets bad press because people try to make it something it's not.\u00a0 Wikipedia is not tablets handed...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Blogging &amp; Internet&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Blogging &amp; Internet","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":44145,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/08\/05\/more-right-to-be-forgotten-silliness.html","url_meta":{"origin":10291,"position":5},"title":"More &quot;Right To Be Forgotten&quot; silliness","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 5-Aug-14 6:50am","format":false,"excerpt":"Google offers some pertinent notes on issues around the European \"Right To Be Forgotten\" discussion:'We generally have to rely on the requester for information, without assurance beyond the requester\u2019s own assertions as to its accuracy. Some requests turn out to have been made with false and inaccurate information. Even if\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10291","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10291"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10291\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}