{"id":16962,"date":"2010-03-25T13:31:36","date_gmt":"2010-03-25T20:31:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/?p=16962"},"modified":"2010-03-25T13:31:36","modified_gmt":"2010-03-25T20:31:36","slug":"the-right-got-the-right-thing-right-all-right-but","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2010\/03\/25\/the-right-got-the-right-thing-right-all-right-but.html","title":{"rendered":"The Right got the “right” thing right, all right, but …"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Visit-the-Sick.jpg\"<\/a>[Huh.\u00a0 Wrote this yesterday, but managed to just save it as a draft rather than publish it.]<\/small><\/p>\n

Okay, that was stretching a play on words, but I ran across this opinion piece<\/a> by David E. Smith at OneNewsNow, and found it just chock-full of inaccuracies, hyperbole, and tortured reason (big surprise), while, ironically, finding I agree with the headline.<\/p>\n

Healthcare is NOT a ‘right’<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I agree.\u00a0 Health care is not a “right” as we generally understand them in this country — a personal freedom and liberty.<\/p>\n

It is, to my mind, though, an obligation <\/em>upon our society as a whole, both moral and Constitutional.\u00a0 For the moral side, I’ll point (since so much of the opposition strangely comes from the Christian Right) to any number of admonitions from Jesus to care for the sick and to love our neighbor.\u00a0 For the Constitution, I’ll point at the Preamble:<\/p>\n

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The “general welfare” clause sometimes feels overused as a basis for the federal government to do stuff, but it’s hard to think of anything that better fits the idea of “promoting the general welfare” than providing basic health care to all.\u00a0 Really.<\/p>\n

So, I agree with the headline.\u00a0 And … that’s about it.\u00a0 To return to the article (which I’ll use as an excuse to celebrate the passage of some form of health care coverage reform, and as a whipping boy for how much I despise most of the ideological opposition to it):<\/p>\n

Like many Americans across the nation, I watched intensely as Congress debated and ultimately passed the onerous healthcare “reform” bill Sunday evening.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Is there a reason “reform” is in quotation marks?\u00a0 I mean, really?<\/p>\n

One main point of contention is the idea — affirmed by some radically “progressive” lawmakers — that healthcare is a “right.” This is nothing short of socialistic propaganda.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Which means, of course, we can simply dismiss it per se.\u00a0 It’s propaganda. From socialists.\u00a0 It must be evil.<\/p>\n

\n

The implicit claim in the assertion that healthcare is a “right” is that it is a constitutionally protected right. All experts agree that healthcare is neither a constitutional nor a legal right. In America we understand that our rights to the free exercise of religion, to speak freely, to bear arms, and to be secure from unwarranted search and seizure come from God.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Actually, if by “In America we …” you mean “In the Constitution,” then, no, “we” don’t.\u00a0 As the Preamble above shows, the Constitution was established by We the People<\/em>. While Jefferson (who’s he?) may have mentioned in the Declaration of Independence a Creator endowing us with certain “unalienable rights, among them life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” (which to be honest sounds like even more justification for health care as a right than the Constitution), the actual law of the land says nothing about where rights come from, just that (in a late addendum to the document itself) those rights were not to be infringed upon by the government.<\/p>\n

\n

To see the difference in government-mandated healthcare and real<\/em> rights, look at how they are exercised. Historically, American citizens have been free to exercise their real, constitutionally protected rights — or not<\/em> — as they see fit.<\/p>\n

For example, the government does not compel citizens to attend church in the name of religious freedom.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Though, of course, some on the Right claim that religious freedom means that a government organization — a school, for example — ought to be able to force kids of whatever religious faith (if any) to attend, or even participate in, organized prayer.<\/p>\n

\n

The government does not compel citizens to own a gun in the name of the Second Amendment.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Though some municipalities have tried to mandate gun ownership, usually as a hyper-Second Amendment sort of thing. And I don’t recall any conservatives arguing that was an unconstitutional mandate.<\/p>\n

\n

And the government does not force citizens to engage in the political process in the name of free speech.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

That’s true.\u00a0 In fact, the Right is usually trying to keep people out <\/em>of the political process … unless it’s corporations, in which case they are welcome.<\/p>\n

\n

In contrast, our radically “progressive” friends…<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Love the “scare quotes.”<\/p>\n

\n

… are eager to compel every American using the heavy hand of government to exercise their so-called “right” to healthcare. Should we celebrate the passage of a bill that in the service of non-existent rights actually diminishes our liberty?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Nobody is being forced to go to the doctor.\u00a0 Everyone is being forced to pay into the pool of health care insurance in the country.\u00a0 This particular plan does it through insurance companies, rather than through explicit taxes (which some of us would have preferred), but it’s still taxation (with representation).<\/p>\n

Or, put another way, if we paid for the National Guard (state militias) by requiring each citizen was required to buy a gun and uniform for the NG’s use — and, if you didn’t, you’d be assessed a direct tax instead — would that be forcing you to “buy” military defense? Would that be effectively different than having it paid for by taxes?<\/p>\n

I realize that the word “tax” is considered a dirty word, but only a very few nuts think the government (we the people) don’t have a constitutional right to tax.<\/p>\n

\n

What is really at issue is not whether healthcare is a “right,” but whether citizens have a right to taxpayer-funded healthcare. What other cherished American “right” has ever required that we diminish another’s liberty?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

You know that whole “everyone who goes to the ER must get treatment, whether or not they can pay” that folks like Dubya interpreted as how the US has universal health care?\u00a0 That’s a federally-mandated legal “right” that means higher health costs for everyone else who attends that hospital.<\/p>\n

Then there are areas where rights\/freedoms clash — the right to worship freely diminishes the liberty of those who would much prefer that some folks’ worship (beliefs, religion) were illegal and stamped out.\u00a0 That’s a bass-ackward perception of “liberty,” but one that has often been argued by majorities against the minority.<\/p>\n

Swinging back to the Constitution, how about the explicit constitutional right to representation by an attorney?\u00a0 That requires the hiring of public defenders, which are a tax burden, which Mr Smith would seem to think is a diminution of his liberty.\u00a0 Certainly the right not to have soldiers housed at your house means we have to build military bases, which cost all the other taxpayers money, just because you have a particular right.<\/p>\n

How about the expansion — in the constitution — of voting rights?\u00a0 Women, minorities, eighteen-year-olds … each expansion effectively diminished the liberty (in terms of effective voting power) of all previously enfranchised groups.<\/p>\n

What about those rights that all people have in this country to not be slaves?\u00a0 That certainly diminished the “liberty” of slave owners by robbing them of their property.\u00a0 I think a war was fought over that one, but I believe the principle was pretty well established.<\/p>\n

\n

Does the right to free speech require newspaper owners to print every op-ed and editorial? Does the right to bear arms require the government to arm its citizenry?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

See, this actually gets back to my original premise — that health care isn’t a personal right, but a social obligation — that I have to agree.\u00a0 But, then, the difference between these rights and the ones I just mentioned in the previous few paragraphs is that some rights are in the form of “the government shall not” and others in the form that “the government shall.”\u00a0 The former (free speech, the right to bear arms) are the first form, and generally speaking (except for restricting the majority’s liberty to act, through the government, on the majority’s behalf) do not diminish anyone’s liberty.\u00a0 The latter, though, almost always cost money.\u00a0 Whether paid for by taxes directly or indirectly, that’s a reduction in personal liberty (as Smith would put it).<\/p>\n

\n

Does the freedom of religion require government-funding of churches, mosques, and synagogues? Of course not!<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Well, some folks think it should, especially majority Christian churches. Certainly they — and, remarkably, many of them write for OneNewsNow — think that the government should be at least allowed to fund religious organizations. And some argue that freedom of religion is a key reason why religions tend to be exempt from taxation, even property taxes — which is, effectively, government funding assistance.<\/p>\n

\n

Why then, does this “right” to healthcare require the government to take from some to give to others? When in the history of our country have we had to secure a right by trampling on the liberties of others?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

See my note on the Civil War, above.<\/p>\n

\n

Make no mistake…that is exactly what is happening with this government takeover of the healthcare industry.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

And how is the government “taking over” the healthcare industry?\u00a0 Have we suddenly purchased Wellpoint?\u00a0 Are doctors all now working for Uncle Sam?\u00a0 There’s not even a Public Option<\/em>, let alone a Public Takeover.\u00a0 This is one of the most fact-challenged aspects of the whole HCR debate I’ve seen.<\/p>\n

\n

This new healthcare “right” will be forced on every American; and it will be made possible — in the words of Karl Marx — by taking from citizens “according to their ability” and giving to others “according to their needs.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Didn’t Jesus note that giving was measured by ability to give, not by flat totals (cf. the Widow’s Mite)?\u00a0 Didn’t Jesus tell us to give to the needy?\u00a0 Wouldn’t it be just as accurate to talk about HCR as fulfilling Jesus’ will as Marx’s?\u00a0 Or would that be too much like “social justice”?<\/p>\n

And I’d have to wonder how Mr Smith feels about progressive taxation — charging the rich at a higher rate than the poor.\u00a0 I’d have to assume that this sort of “according to their ability” thing would me he’d be in favor of a flat tax.\u00a0 Actually I’d assume he’d be against any taxation whatsoever for any social spending, since that represents the government “giving to others ‘according to their needs.'”<\/p>\n

\n

According to U.S. Representative John Boehner (R-Ohio), this legislation will create 160 new governmental boards, commissions, and mandates, and will require $500 billion in tax increases to pay for it. Of course, that will be only the beginning, as additional taxpayer funds will most certainly be needed.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

So now it’s not the individual mandate, it’s that it’s going to cost some amount of money.\u00a0 Okay, that’s a different argument.\u00a0 But, then, I have no faith in anything Rep. Boehner says on the subject, aside from the general principle that it’s going to cost money.\u00a0 Yup.\u00a0 Supposed to save a lot of money, too.\u00a0 But if this is a discussion about “rights,” are those dictated only by whether “freedom is free”?<\/p>\n

\n

Healthcare lawyer and policy analyst John S. Hoff illuminates the troubling questions left unanswered by the phrase “right to healthcare,” which he argues “does not address the relevant issues that must be considered in considering taxpayer subsidies for healthcare”:<\/p>\n

How much healthcare is to be paid for by the taxpayer, for what beneficiaries, and under what circumstances? Does it include the most advanced or experimental treatment?<\/p>\n

Indeed, what is healthcare? Long-term care? What are the parameters of self-responsibility? Should there be taxpayer subsidies for smokers, drug abusers, and dare-devils?<\/p>\n

And which taxpayers should be paying? Should the working young and low-income workers subsidize the healthcare costs of those who are wealthier and sicker?<\/p>\n

These are political judgments that we have barely addressed, and they are camouflaged by invocation of a broad principle of a “right” to healthcare.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I agree — those are all interesting questions.\u00a0 But, then, look at the “rights” Mr Smith has already invoked.\u00a0 The “right” to free speech — what does that really mean?\u00a0 What is “free” speech?\u00a0 What is “speech”?\u00a0 What limitations can and should government put on that right, on what basis, in what cases?\u00a0 A lot of political judgments there that continue to play in the headlines, legislatures, and courtrooms in this country over two centuries after that right was formally recognized in the US Constitution.<\/p>\n

If we wait until everything about health care is hammered out, we’ll never do anything about it.\u00a0 If the same argument had been made about free speech, we wouldn’t have it, either.<\/p>\n

\n

President Obama and many in Congress are celebrating the passage of this ominous legislation …<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Ominous!<\/p>\n

\n

… — legislation that forces American citizens …<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Forces!<\/p>\n

\n

… into the newly created, socialized healthcare system.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Socialized!<\/p>\n

\n

Sadly, the costs of this new government program are much higher than we think. Although the financial cost to taxpayers is substantial, the cost to personal liberty is incalculable.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Because I, David E. Smith, say so!\u00a0 Because it means I may have to pay more taxes! And those taxes will end\u00a0 up being given to someone else! Maybe people I don’t like, or don’t think deserve it, or who I think would be better off sick or dead! And that is violating my personal liberty incalculably!<\/em><\/p>\n

Which, when it comes down to it, doesn’t have anything to do about whether health care is a right <\/em>(I still don’t think it is) or whether it’s a societal obligation<\/em> (I think so), but only whether Mr. Smith gets to not worry about it.\u00a0 That’s the liberty he’s seeking — the liberty of indifference.<\/p>\n

Whereas I’m just glad that we have recognized, just a little bit more, that obligation.\u00a0 I think that makes us more free, not less, not the slaves of tyrants, but liberated through willingly being servants<\/a> to those around us in need.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[Huh.\u00a0 Wrote this yesterday, but managed to just save it as a draft rather than publish it.] Okay, that was stretching a play on words, but I ran across this opinion piece by David E. Smith at OneNewsNow, and found it just chock-full of inaccuracies, hyperbole, and tortured reason (big surprise), while, ironically, finding I … Continue reading “The Right got the “right” thing right, all right, but …”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":15721,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9,71],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16962","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics-law","category-religion-me"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/09\/Visit-the-Sick.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":129774,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2016\/02\/09\/the-only-thing-democrats-agree-on.html","url_meta":{"origin":16962,"position":0},"title":"The only thing Democrats agree on","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 9-Feb-16 12:20pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Because I actually read stuff from people saying this (or at least the Panels 2-3 this). Yeesh.(via http:\/\/www.gocomics.com\/tomtoles\/2016\/02\/08) \u00a0 View on Google+","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/tt160208.gifimgmax%3D660.gif?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/tt160208.gifimgmax%3D660.gif?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/tt160208.gifimgmax%3D660.gif?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":131400,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2016\/08\/30\/something-we-can-all-agree-on.html","url_meta":{"origin":16962,"position":1},"title":"Something we can all agree on","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 30-Aug-16 9:58pm","format":false,"excerpt":"People of good will may surely disagree about Colin Kaepernick' beliefs, or his actions in pursuit of those beliefs.But surely we can all agree that Sean Hannity is a hack, right?'There was one -- I don't know, I've never been able to confirm this, I looked earlier today, that he\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":27076,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/03\/13\/a-position-by-a-republican-senator-i-can-agree-with.html","url_meta":{"origin":16962,"position":2},"title":"A position by a Republican senator I can agree with","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 13-Mar-12 2:07pm","format":false,"excerpt":"If you're not going to show history, why call it the History Channel? #ddtb Embedded Link Grassley pounds History Channel for lack of history | Washington Examiner Something has been eating at Chuck Grassley. It started back in February, when the Iowa senator and history lover turned on the History\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":24692,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2011\/12\/20\/whaddayknow-i-agree-on-some-advice-from-newt.html","url_meta":{"origin":16962,"position":3},"title":"Whaddayknow? I agree on some advice from Newt!","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 20-Dec-11 6:07pm","format":false,"excerpt":"If a key question for gay individuals is how the White House will address their equal treatment under the law in US society, Obama is hardly a perfect choice, but he's a heck of a lot better than Newt (or his cohorts in the GOP race). #ddtb Embedded Link Newt\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":138001,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2019\/02\/28\/finally-a-job-we-can-all-agree-wed-rather-have-done-by-a-robot.html","url_meta":{"origin":16962,"position":4},"title":"Finally, a job we can all agree we’d rather have done by a robot","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 28-Feb-19 10:40pm","format":false,"excerpt":"People often express a lot of concern about how robots are taking human jobs. Here's a job I think pretty much any human worker would be willing to hand over to the machines: disassembling and decommissioning obsolete cluster munitions for the US military. Roboticists keep saying that robots are there\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hi-Tech"","block_context":{"text":"Hi-Tech","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/hi-tech"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/munitions-and-robots.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/munitions-and-robots.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/munitions-and-robots.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/munitions-and-robots.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/munitions-and-robots.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6599,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2004\/08\/13\/moderation_in_a.html","url_meta":{"origin":16962,"position":5},"title":"Moderation in all things","author":"***Dave","date":"Fri 13-Aug-04 12:26pm","format":false,"excerpt":"I haven't decided that I agree with the candidate conclusions of \"Republicans for Kerry\" in this race, but if I saw a candidate whom I actually thought was firmly dedicated...","rel":"","context":"In "Elections 2004"","block_context":{"text":"Elections 2004","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/politics-law\/elections-2004"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16962","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16962"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16962\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15721"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16962"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}