{"id":17984,"date":"2010-07-29T18:26:46","date_gmt":"2010-07-30T00:26:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/?p=17984"},"modified":"2010-07-29T18:26:46","modified_gmt":"2010-07-30T00:26:46","slug":"i-really-just-do-not-understand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2010\/07\/29\/i-really-just-do-not-understand.html","title":{"rendered":"I really just do not understand"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/div>\n

I keep trying to put my head around the crowing and cheering from the Religious Right over the GOP block of the DISCLOSE Act. The proposed law had nothing to do with religion or morality or culture war issues or anything of the sort.Why, then, are they (a) so thrilled by its obstruction, and (b) painting it as a victory for Free Speech?<\/p>\n

The answer, of course, is that it helps the Republican Party.\u00a0 And that, evidently, is enough to make the Religious Right very happy.<\/p>\n

To wit: Christian Coalition wins First Amendment victory in Senate | Christian Coalition of America<\/a><\/p>\n

Yesterday afternoon, an interesting victory\u00a0was\u00a0won by\u00a0the Republican Party in the United States Senate.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It’s interesting that you call it “interesting.”<\/p>\n

All of the Republicans stuck together\u00a0 —\u00a0 including the 3 left-wing to moderate New England Republicans\u00a0 —\u00a0 providing a victory for the GOP and\u00a0First Amendment rights victory for all Americans.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

At least all Americans who are corporations.\u00a0 Are there other Americans who were helpeed by this?\u00a0 Do tell!<\/p>\n

Christian Coalition of America (CCA) has been working for weeks trying to defeat this disaster of a bill, which actually passed the United States House of Representatives.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Oh my God! It actually passed the United States House of Representatives! <\/em>Get the children inside, Mildred!<\/p>\n

By a margin of one vote in the Senate yesterday, the onerous legislation called the “Disclose Act”\u00a0introduced by the Democrats to help their union boss cronies and to censor the free speech rights of their opponents, was defeated.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Wow, the Crazy Factor per Sentence just pegged\u00a0 out.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The bill was not defeated per se.\u00a0 It actually garnered a vote of 57 to 41 to be brought to the floor for debate in the Senate.\u00a0 Under the current Cloud-Cuckoo World of that august body, that meant that it was successfully blocked.<\/li>\n
  2. It’s the DISCLOSE Act (Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light On Spending in Elections).<\/li>\n
  3. The bill provided no special benefit to unions?\u00a0 Its provisions included unions as well as corporations.<\/li>\n
  4. The bill did not censor free speech.\u00a0 Corporations (which, under the Supreme Court’s Citizens United<\/em> ruling, were magically granted the right of free speech) could say and do whatever they wanted in support of (or opposition to) a candidate.\u00a0 They simply had to do so publicly<\/em>, not by back-door contributions in the middle of the night.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    But I guess that, when you’re the Christian Coalition, you get to lie about thing with the assurance that Jesus will forgive you.<\/p>\n

    The major immediate problem\u00a0was, the Supreme Court would not have been able to strike down this clearly unconstitutional bill in time for the November elections\u00a0during which\u00a0the Democrats hoped to hold down the great losses they will now undoubtedly suffer. Most analysts believe the House of Representatives will revert back to the Republicans after 4 disastrous years of Democrat control under San Francisco Democrat Nancy Pelosi.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Actually, most analysts believe no such thing.\u00a0 It’s within the realm of possibility, but it is not considered the most probable result.<\/p>\n

    (We’ll leave aside the rather untoward political partisan chortling over this by the CCA, not to mention their obligatory reference to Pelosi as being from San Francisco … and you know what that <\/em>means …)<\/p>\n

    The Christian Coalition has been targetting the New England Republican Senators for weeks and was very pleased to see all of them join all of the other Senate Republicans in voting no\u00a0on\u00a0this abominable bill.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Abominable? Really?<\/p>\n

    The Senate Republican\u00a0Leader Mitch McConnell from Kentucky called\u00a0the Democrats’ “Disclose Act” a “transparent effort to rig the fall election for Democrats.”\u00a0 And he added that “Unions are the ultimate victors under this bill.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    And that’s because …?\u00a0 I mean, nice analysis and context, simply quoting a sound bite from the Senate Minority Leader.<\/p>\n

    The Democrats came up with this latest scheme to stifle debate in America after the United States Supreme Court\u00a0 —\u00a0 in a landmark ruling in January\u00a0 —\u00a0 declared that corporations and labor unions can use money from their general budgets to fund television advertisements calling for the election or defeat of candidates for Congress and for the White House.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    See? Citizens United benefited unions, too.\u00a0 So how was the DISCLOSE Act to their benefit?<\/p>\n

    Today’s “The Wall Street Journal” reported that before\u00a0January’s Supreme Court decision,\u00a0these organizations had to fund political advertisements by collecting smaller donations from individuals.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Egads! You mean, they had to rely on individual citizens <\/em>to contribute to a cause!\u00a0 How tyrannical and socialistic and Muslim of the Obama-Pelosi Cabal!<\/p>\n

    After Barack Obama audaciously and intentionally misinterpreted the Supreme Court ruling in this year’s State of the Union speech, Congress schemed to come up with a bill to help its radical union boss friends at the expense of groups and businesses which help Republicans and others who believe in the free enterprise system.<\/p>\n

    Intentional! Misleading! Scheme! Radical! Union Bosses!<\/p>\n

    And, yes, so it’s clearly “Republicans, Republicans, rah rah rah!” Which is remarkably pragmatic, if not terribly spiritual, of the Christian Coalition.<\/p>\n

    The Democrats in their “Disclose Act” had all sorts of onerous reporting requirements for those groups they consider their enemies, which would have effectively shut down criticism of Democrats and their left-wing agenda.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Yes! I mean, corporations (all corporations, and interest groups, including unions) would have to actually let people know <\/em>that they were “criticizing Democrats and their left-wing agend.”\u00a0 They couldn’t just funnel money to astroturf organizations.\u00a0 How terribly, horribly, awfully, abominably onerous!<\/em><\/p>\n

    If this would “shut down” that criticism, it would only be because there would be voter and consumer backlash against such donations if they were made public.\u00a0 Which sounds like a way to let the people decide, don’t you think?<\/p>\n

    I mean, think of it, CCA — wouldn’t you like to know that Company X or Union Y or Interest Group Z is supporting some candidate who favors all sorts of Twisted and Evil Things like, say, gay rights?\u00a0 Or know that a candidate is getting money directly from some company known for supporting such thigns?\u00a0 Wouldn’t you want your members to know about that?\u00a0 Sorry, without the DISCLOSE Act, all that Godless Evil Shenanigans will take place under the radar.<\/p>\n

    But it helps the Republicans, so who cares?<\/p>\n

    “The Wall Street Journal” article reported that Senator Jon Kyl, Republican from Arizona said yesterday regarding the Democrats’ “Disclose Act” legislation:\u00a0 …<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Because if a Republican Senator says it in the WSJ, you can take it to the bank!\u00a0 Or know that the bank has taken it to him (preferably in small, unmarked bills).<\/p>\n

    … “It is obviously written to disadvantage Republicans and favor Democrats.”\u00a0 For example, the article reports that “One of the more controversial provisions of the bill would require independent political entities to disclose the names of the donors to their political advertisements.\u00a0 Opponents said that could discourage corporations from donating to organizations such as the Chamber of Commerce, that run political ads.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Why would that discourage those companies, unless they thought the Chamber was running ads that might be embarrassing or might cause consumers to consider who they are doing business with?<\/p>\n

    The American people are sick and tired of the radical policies coming out of this Democrat-controlled 111th Congress and are getting ready to throw out many\u00a0of these bums, to use the vernacular.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Your vernacular is down on the street, fo-shizzle!<\/p>\n

    The party of Jefferson and Jackson will rue the day they decided to follow the extreme left-wing policies coming out of the White House.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Well, and there’s a convincing argument!<\/p>\n

    \"Render<\/a>So … seriously … where’s the beef here?\u00a0 The article seems to boil down to, “Making big corporations reveal that they are contributing to a candidate’s campaign might be embarrassing, for the corporations and candidates alike, so, since we think that might hurt the Republicans more, and since the Republicans are our BFFs, we will wrap ourselves up in the flag and render unto Caesar in the hope that Caesar will render back to us when they come into power again.”<\/em><\/p>\n

    Just what Christ would argue, I’ll betcha!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    I keep trying to put my head around the crowing and cheering from the Religious Right over the GOP block of the DISCLOSE Act. The proposed law had nothing to do with religion or morality or culture war issues or anything of the sort.Why, then, are they (a) so thrilled by its obstruction, and (b) … Continue reading “I really just do not understand”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":17986,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[81,9,27,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-elections-2010","category-politics-law","category-religion","category-zt-pc"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/coins.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":10924,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2007\/05\/17\/the_shifting_priorities_o.html","url_meta":{"origin":17984,"position":0},"title":"The shifting priorities of the Religious Right?","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 17-May-07 7:07am","format":false,"excerpt":"Interesting article on NPR yesterday about some demographic shifts going on in the evangelical \/ conservative Christian \/ \"Religious Right\" movement.\u00a0 While issues like abortion and homosexuality are still important,...","rel":"","context":"In "Elections 2008"","block_context":{"text":"Elections 2008","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/politics-law\/elections-2008"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":13537,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2008\/11\/19\/alaskas_senate_race.html","url_meta":{"origin":17984,"position":1},"title":"Alaska’s Senate race","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 19-Nov-08 9:42am","format":false,"excerpt":"Electoral-vote.com gives the latest on Alaska's Senatorial election. First off, looks like Alaska and the Republicans won't be embarrassed by a convicted felon being returned to office. With all but...","rel":"","context":"In "Elections 2008"","block_context":{"text":"Elections 2008","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/politics-law\/elections-2008"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":30730,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/10\/22\/being-a-non-republican-christian-or-a-christian-non-republican.html","url_meta":{"origin":17984,"position":2},"title":"Being a non-Republican Christian. Or a Christian non-Republican","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 22-Oct-12 7:35am","format":false,"excerpt":"For too many people, \"Republican = Christian\". \u00a0From the outside of Christianity, Christians get identified with conservative Christian evangelical types, many of whom are Republican ... and who, themselves, mistake their particular flavor of Christianity with Christianity as a whole (and, thus, their political affiliation with The Only Party a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":135363,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2017\/11\/14\/even-republican-national-committee-backing-away-roy-moore.html","url_meta":{"origin":17984,"position":3},"title":"Even the Republican National Committee is backing away from Roy Moore","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 14-Nov-17 8:02pm","format":false,"excerpt":"They've stopped joint fund-raising events and pulled the people they sent to Alabama to help canvass for him. Moore's trouble have a weird triangle shape to them. In one corner is Moore and his Alabama political supporters. Opposing him, but for different reasons, are the Democrats (locally and nationally) and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Roy-Moore.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":23508,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2011\/11\/06\/muslim-kids-permitted-by-law-to-bully-christian-kids.html","url_meta":{"origin":17984,"position":4},"title":"Muslim kids permitted by law to bully Christian kids","author":"***Dave","date":"Sun 6-Nov-11 5:14pm","format":false,"excerpt":"That's not what the Michigan GOP expects their new anti-bullying bill to allow -- clearly it's simply about allowing Christian bullies to continue to pick on gays and Muslims and others, as they feel the Bible commands them to do. But their \"sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction\" loophole\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":129066,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2015\/12\/04\/thank-heavens-the-congressional-gop-has-their-priorities-straight.html","url_meta":{"origin":17984,"position":5},"title":"Thank heavens the congressional GOP has their priorities straight!","author":"***Dave","date":"Fri 4-Dec-15 1:27pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Because what is a better way to celebrate Christmas than the Senate passing a bill that would toss almost 20 million people out of having health coverage? 'It repeals the expansion of Medicaid adopted by 30 states as well as many of the law\u2019s tax increases, which the House bill\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17984"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17984\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17986"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}