{"id":19757,"date":"2011-01-03T22:30:43","date_gmt":"2011-01-04T05:30:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2011\/01\/03\/unblogged-bits-mon-3-jan-11-2230.html"},"modified":"2011-01-03T22:30:43","modified_gmt":"2011-01-04T05:30:43","slug":"unblogged-bits-mon-3-jan-11-2230","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2011\/01\/03\/unblogged-bits-mon-3-jan-11-2230.html","title":{"rendered":"Unblogged Bits (Mon.  3-Jan-11 2230)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries &#8230;. <\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/Three-starDavesSharedItemsInGoogleReader\/~3\/-sjQdpHC_Vk\/027356.php\">The new litmus test<\/a> &#8211; &#8220;But that was before the GOP fell off the right-wing cliff. Now every Republican who was even remotely sensible on this &#8216;better have an explanation, an excuse or a mea culpa for why this won&#8217;t happen again.'&#8221;<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/Three-starDavesSharedItemsInGoogleReader\/~3\/hULsyTZb_oI\/scalia-women-discrimination-constitution_n_803813.html\">Scalia: Women Don&#8217;t Have Constitutional Protection Against Discrimination<\/a> &#8211; So, despite the plain language of the 14th Amendment, Scalia believes that those who the writers at the time would not have thought of as covered by it (Women, Gays &#8230; Jews? Latinos? Atheists?) are not.  Presumably he thinks the same about the other civil rights amendments &#8212; the First Amendment would only apply to religions that the Founders would agree should be free to practice, to political speech the Founders would have recognized as such, etc.  Lovely.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/Three-starDavesSharedItemsInGoogleReader\/~3\/In814OftX7I\/fishcer-says-leading-gop-presidential-hopefuls-all-fall-short\">Fischer Says Leading GOP Presidential Hopefuls All Fall Short<\/a> &#8211; I&#8217;m sure Fischer would be more than happy to be recruited to the cause &#8230;<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/Three-starDavesSharedItemsInGoogleReader\/~3\/Hbjwd5mVaeU\/\">Lindsey Graham Threatens To Hold Debt Ceiling Vote Hostage For Regressive  Social Security Cuts<\/a> &#8211; And the plan becomes clearer.  They aren&#8217;t crazy whackos out to blow up stuff for no good reason; they are just playing as crazy whackos in order to extort what they can&#8217;t get through normal legislative channels.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/Three-starDavesSharedItemsInGoogleReader\/~3\/DFYXPkiUAgA\/north_american.php\">North American English Dialects<\/a> &#8211; I need to examine this in more detail, but it looks very cool.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries &#8230;. The new litmus test &#8211; &#8220;But that was before the GOP fell off the right-wing cliff. Now every Republican who was even remotely sensible on this &#8216;better have an explanation, an excuse or a mea culpa for why this &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2011\/01\/03\/unblogged-bits-mon-3-jan-11-2230.html\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Unblogged Bits (Mon.  3-Jan-11 2230)&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19757","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-potpourri"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":50202,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2015\/04\/28\/scalia-has-an-odd-understanding-of-the-first-amendment.html","url_meta":{"origin":19757,"position":0},"title":"Scalia has an odd understanding of the First Amendment","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 28-Apr-15 3:28pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Or he's been reading too many Conservative Christian fear mags.As Justice Kagan noted, Jewish rabbis who choose not to marry mixed-religion couples are still licensed by the state to officiate at marriages. Catholic priests are not required to marry non-Catholics, or divorcees. And there are still churches (few and far\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":43092,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/06\/17\/scalia-says-if-he-has-to-listen-to-bad-music-you-have-to-listen-to-government-p.html","url_meta":{"origin":19757,"position":1},"title":"Scalia says If he has to listen to bad music, you have to listen to government p&#8230;","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 17-Jun-14 11:42am","format":false,"excerpt":"Scalia says If he has to listen to bad music, you have to listen to government prayerOr something like that. Basically, SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia\u00a0equates people being offended by government-sponsored religious activity with his own aesthetic disdain for public performances of Stravinsky -- with the exception that the First Amendment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":129328,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2016\/01\/02\/not-surprisingly-scalia-thinks-the-government-should-support-religion.html","url_meta":{"origin":19757,"position":2},"title":"Not surprisingly, Scalia thinks the Government should support religion","author":"***Dave","date":"Sat 2-Jan-16 5:56pm","format":false,"excerpt":"In a speech at Archbishop Rummel High School in Metairie, Louisiana, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia made it very clear his feeling that the Constitutional guarantee of Freedom of Religion doesn't mean Freedom from Religion, and that the US government traditionally has and should support \"religious principles\" over non-religious or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/-335ff278a52421bb5B15D.JPGimgmax%3D660.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/-335ff278a52421bb5B15D.JPGimgmax%3D660.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/-335ff278a52421bb5B15D.JPGimgmax%3D660.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":130820,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2016\/06\/07\/why-whomever-ends-up-on-the-supreme-court-wont-affect-guns.html","url_meta":{"origin":19757,"position":3},"title":"Why whomever ends up on the Supreme Court won&#039;t affect guns","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 7-Jun-16 11:58pm","format":false,"excerpt":"TL;DR: A conservative wouldn't change the balance Scalia provided, and a liberal wouild recognize that Heller hasn't actually changed things all that much (but that overturning it might lead to proposals for a beefed-up constitutional amendment that would). Why the Supreme Court Won't Impact Gun Rights or the Second Amendment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":33261,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2013\/04\/18\/scalia-damages-the-supreme-courts-reputation-again.html","url_meta":{"origin":19757,"position":4},"title":"Scalia damages the Supreme Court&#8217;s reputation. Again","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 18-Apr-13 6:16pm","format":false,"excerpt":"History will be extremely unkind to Justice Scalia, between his dubious reasoning and his outspoken behavior that would lead to ethics charges being filed for anyone but a SCOTUS justice.Unfortunately, he's only 77, and, judgment of history aside, it seems like he still has plenty of time to hurt the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":31710,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/12\/11\/antonin-scalia-moralist.html","url_meta":{"origin":19757,"position":5},"title":"Antonin Scalia, Moralist","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 11-Dec-12 10:54am","format":false,"excerpt":"Okay, I sort of get what Scalia is saying here. Maybe. If he means that all law is built on morality (even to concepts like protecting innocent life and justice), and that if moral disagreement\u00a0over homosexuality is not sufficient\u00a0for legislatures to ban it, then how do we justify banning bestiality,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19757","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19757"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19757\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19757"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19757"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19757"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}