{"id":28301,"date":"2012-06-15T13:38:53","date_gmt":"2012-06-15T19:38:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/06\/15\/what-old-is-newly-copyrighted-again.html"},"modified":"2014-11-05T10:58:15","modified_gmt":"2014-11-05T17:58:15","slug":"what-old-is-newly-copyrighted-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/06\/15\/what-old-is-newly-copyrighted-again.html","title":{"rendered":"What Old is New(ly Copyrighted) Again"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SCOTUS rules that Congress can re-copyright works that had fallen into the public domain here in the US &#8212; in this case to comply with the Berne convention.<\/p>\n<p>Far be it from me to agree with anything Sameul Alito says, but &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><i>In dissent, Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito said the legislation goes against the theory of copyright and \u201cdoes not encourage anyone to produce a single new work.\u201d Copyright, they noted, was part of the Constitution to promote the arts and sciences.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Anthony Falzone, executive director of the Fair Use Project at Stanford University and a plaintiff\u2019s lawyer in the case, called the decision \u201cunfortunate\u201d and said it \u201csuggests *Congress is not required to pay particularly close attention to the interests of the public when it passes copyright laws.*\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p>(Emphasis mine.)<\/p>\n<p>Which should come as no surprise, because when it comes to copyright and intellectual property issues, Congress&#39; primary priorities have for many years been corporate copyright holders, not the general public.<\/p>\n<p style='clear:both;'>\n<p style='margin-bottom:5px;'><strong>Embedded Link<\/strong><\/p>\n<div style='height:120px;width:120px;overflow:hidden;float:left;margin-top:0px;padding-top:0px;margin-right:10px;vertical-align:top;text-align:center;clear:both;'>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img style='max-width:none;' src='https:\/\/images0-focus-opensocial.googleusercontent.com\/gadgets\/proxy?container=focus&#038;gadget=a&#038;resize_h=100&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2Fimages_blogs%2Fthreatlevel%2F2012%2F01%2Fstravisnky.png' border='0' \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href='http:\/\/www.wired.com\/threatlevel\/2012\/01\/scotus-re-copyright-decision\/'>Supreme Court Says Congress May Re-Copyright Public Domain Works | Threat Level | Wired.com<\/a><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCongress may take works out of the public domain and grant them copyright status, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday. The top court was ruling on a petition by a group of orchestra conductors, educator&#8230;\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p style='clear:both;'> <strong>Google+:<\/strong> <a href='https:\/\/plus.google.com\/101083456815352083930\/posts\/e5EF7EzT6kC' target='_new'>View post on Google+<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SCOTUS rules that Congress can re-copyright works that had fallen into the public domain here in the US &#8212; in this case to comply with the Berne convention. Far be it from me to agree with anything Sameul Alito says, but &#8230; In dissent, Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito said the legislation goes against &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/06\/15\/what-old-is-newly-copyrighted-again.html\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;What Old is New(ly Copyrighted) Again&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[106,79],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-plusposts","category-media-intellectual-property"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":25566,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/01\/18\/de-public-domaining.html","url_meta":{"origin":28301,"position":0},"title":"De-public Domaining","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 18-Jan-12 8:12pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Because, of course, property rights must always trump all else, the US Supreme Court upheld, 6-1 (Breyer and Alito dissenting, Kagan recused), that Congress can take something that's already passed into Public Domain and put it back under copyright -- in this case to align with an international treaty.How this\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9178,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2006\/02\/02\/i_say_left_you.html","url_meta":{"origin":28301,"position":1},"title":"I say Left, you say Right &#8230;","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 2-Feb-06 7:08am","format":false,"excerpt":"As another demonstration that the convenient (but themselves vastly oversimplified) labels of \"Left\" and \"Right\" (or \"Liberal\" and \"Conservative\") apply way too sloppily when considering the judiciary (especially the Supreme...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Politics &amp; Law&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Politics &amp; Law","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/politics-law"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":137499,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2018\/12\/28\/a-long-awaited-copyright-thaw-begins-on-new-years-day.html","url_meta":{"origin":28301,"position":2},"title":"A long-awaited copyright thaw begins on New Years Day","author":"***Dave","date":"Fri 28-Dec-18 10:29am","format":false,"excerpt":"After the last Disney-sponsored throttling of creative works passing from copyright status in the US to the public domain, we've had a freeze on such things, with anything published after 1922 being still deemed under copyright, with all the restrictions for use and re-use that carries. That happened in 1998,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":31875,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/12\/20\/free-mickey-mouse-in-2018.html","url_meta":{"origin":28301,"position":3},"title":"Free Mickey Mouse (in 2018)!","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 20-Dec-12 2:49pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Interesting article about how Big Content is getting worried enough about copyright skepticism that it's beginning to pay for \"law articles\" advancing the idea that copyright is a natural right (not just something \"to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts\" as the US Constitution has it), that intellectual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6504,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2004\/08\/24\/this_land_is_yo.html","url_meta":{"origin":28301,"position":4},"title":"This land is your land!","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 24-Aug-04 10:16pm","format":false,"excerpt":"The Ludlow Music folks have dropped their case against Jibjab after lawyers for the latter discovered that -- whoops! -- Woody Guthrie's \"This Land Is Your Land\" is actually in...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Media Moguls&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Media Moguls","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/media\/media-moguls"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3670,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2002\/10\/09\/free_mickey.html","url_meta":{"origin":28301,"position":5},"title":"Free Mickey!","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 9-Oct-02 1:08pm","format":false,"excerpt":"I am a believer in free enterprise. I am a believer in Intellectual Property. I am a believer in the principle of copyright, as laid out in the Constitution. Individuals,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Disney\/Pixar&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Disney\/Pixar","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/media\/franchises\/disney"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28301"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28301\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46383,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28301\/revisions\/46383"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}