{"id":32610,"date":"2013-02-23T15:04:11","date_gmt":"2013-02-23T22:04:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2013\/02\/23\/concealed-carry-not-a-constitutional-right.html"},"modified":"2013-02-23T15:04:11","modified_gmt":"2013-02-23T22:04:11","slug":"concealed-carry-not-a-constitutional-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2013\/02\/23\/concealed-carry-not-a-constitutional-right.html","title":{"rendered":"Concealed Carry not a constitutional right?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"gpb-content\">Makes sense to me, though the federal courts have been quite inconsistent about it (and an appeals court just ruled that blanket banning of it was unconstitutional).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reshared post from +<a href='https:\/\/plus.google.com\/111267716732125387127'>The Denver Post<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><b>&quot;We conclude that the carrying of concealed firearms is not protected by the Second Amendment . . .&quot;<\/b> Justice Carlos Lucero wrote on behalf of a three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver in a ruling issued Friday.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<p class='gpb-article' style='clear:both;'>\n<div style='height:120px;width:120px;overflow:hidden;float:left;margin-top:0px;padding-top:0px;margin-right:10px;vertical-align:top;text-align:center;clear:both;'>\n                                                    <img style='max-width:none;' src='https:\/\/images3-focus-opensocial.googleusercontent.com\/gadgets\/proxy?url=http:\/\/extras.mnginteractive.com\/live\/media\/site36\/2013\/0108\/20130108__glock-pistols-guns~p1.jpg&#038;container=focus&#038;gadget=a&#038;rewriteMime=image\/*&#038;refresh=31536000&#038;resize_h=150&#038;resize_w=150&#038;no_expand=1' border='0' \/>\n                                                <\/div>\n<p>                                                <a href='http:\/\/www.denverpost.com\/breakingnews\/ci_22648641\/federal-court-no-second-amendment-guarantee-concealed-carry'>Federal court: No Second Amendment guarantee for concealed carry<\/a><br \/>\n                                                The Second Amendment\u001bs guarantee of a right to bear arms does not extend to the right to carry a concealed weapon in public, a federal appeals court in Denver has ruled.\n                                            <\/p>\n<p class='gpb-links' style='clear:both;'> <a class='gpb-linkback' href='https:\/\/plus.google.com\/101083456815352083930\/posts\/cUjYrLmoSBm' target='_new'>View this post on Google+<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Makes sense to me, though the federal courts have been quite inconsistent about it (and an appeals court just ruled that blanket banning of it was unconstitutional). Reshared post from +The Denver Post &quot;We conclude that the carrying of concealed firearms is not protected by the Second Amendment . . .&quot; Justice Carlos Lucero wrote &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2013\/02\/23\/concealed-carry-not-a-constitutional-right.html\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Concealed Carry not a constitutional right?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[106],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-plusposts"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":43793,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/07\/23\/a-federal-judge-overturns-colorados-gay-marriage-ban.html","url_meta":{"origin":32610,"position":0},"title":"A federal judge overturns Colorado&#39;s gay marriage ban","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 23-Jul-14 6:52pm","format":false,"excerpt":"It does't mean anything immediately, as he stayed the ruling until SCOTUS weighs in on the Appeals Court ruling in Utah -- but this sort of slow pouring on of judicial consensus at state and federal levels is bound to have an impact on what the Supremes consider when it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":29864,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/16\/cu-and-gun-toting-student-housing-separate-but-equal.html","url_meta":{"origin":32610,"position":1},"title":"CU and gun-toting student housing: separate but equal?","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 16-Aug-12 3:05pm","format":false,"excerpt":"I'm not all that thrilled, at a gut level, about college students carrying guns with a CCW permit -- but if it's legal, it seems to me that segregating them into their own housing is of dubious legality (showing a compelling reason for doing so would be the first challenge).On\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":22898,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2011\/09\/29\/unblogged-bits-thu-29-sep-11-2330.html","url_meta":{"origin":32610,"position":2},"title":"Unblogged Bits (Thu. 29-Sep-11 2330)","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 29-Sep-11 11:30pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries .... Pay attention to the ratings - RHATO was rated \"T\"? Holy crap. Not on my kid watch. (Glad to hear Catwoman was rated \"T+\", but, still ...) FBI Will Revise Narrow Definition Of Rape\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Potpourri&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Potpourri","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/potpourri"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":128334,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2015\/10\/17\/appeals-court-okays-googles-book-scanning.html","url_meta":{"origin":32610,"position":3},"title":"Appeals Court okays Google&#039;s book scanning","author":"***Dave","date":"Sat 17-Oct-15 10:15am","format":false,"excerpt":"I've used Google Books' scans many times, but I can honestly say it has never discouraged me from actually buying a book. In a few cases, in fact, it's been the opposite -- having seen something interesting, I've purchased a copy of the book. Google's Book-Scanning Project Is Legal, U.S.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":39493,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2013\/11\/01\/dc-appeals-court-strikes-down-the-birth-control-coverage-mandate.html","url_meta":{"origin":32610,"position":4},"title":"DC Appeals Court strikes down the Birth Control Coverage Mandate","author":"***Dave","date":"Fri 1-Nov-13 12:38pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Given the array of opinions on this in various federal appeals appeals courts, there's no doubt it's going to be finally decided by SCOTUS. Which, given some of the zanies there, is worrisome.Of course, if the ACA had been crafted to get employers out of the health insurance loop, none\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7487,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2005\/02\/22\/ink_inc_2.html","url_meta":{"origin":32610,"position":5},"title":"Ink, Inc.","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 22-Feb-05 2:40pm","format":false,"excerpt":"An appeals court has dealt another blow to Lexmark's use of the DMCA to keep someone else from selling cheap, compatible inkjet cartridges. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hi-Tech&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hi-Tech","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/hi-tech"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32610"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32610\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}