{"id":3594,"date":"2002-10-21T21:00:28","date_gmt":"2002-10-22T02:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/?p=3594"},"modified":"2002-10-21T21:00:28","modified_gmt":"2002-10-22T02:00:28","slug":"competition_by","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2002\/10\/21\/competition_by.html","title":{"rendered":"Competition by any other name"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Direct Marketing Association has long opposed anti-spam laws.  After all, their members make a living through direct marketing &#8230; i.e., spam.<\/p>\n<p>Problem is, &#8220;big fleas have lesser fleas,&#8221; and the DMA members realize that folks are tuning out all commercial e-mail, solicited or un-, because of the inexorable flood of porn ads, quack medications, insurance\/mortgage\/pyramid schemes and the like.<\/p>\n<p>So the DMA has announced that <a title=\"Direct marketers want anti-spam laws - Tech News - CNET.com\" href=\"http:\/\/msnbc-cnet.com.com\/2100-1023-962821.html?type=pt&#038;part=msnbc&#038;tag=alert&#038;form=feed&#038;subj=cnetnews\">they&#8217;re now backing federal anti-spam legislation<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, like Iraqi &#8220;unconditional&#8221; inspections, what the DMA has in mind as far as legislation goes is a bit different from what most people think.<\/p>\n<p>For example, spam is not, in their eyes, simply unsolicited commercial e-mail.  Why, that&#8217;s every DMA members&#8217;s God-given right to pepper us with.  No, they would have only fraudulent e-mail, with forged headers, be considered spam.<\/p>\n<p>And, of course, they insist on opt-<i>out <\/i>system (i.e., they get to send you stuff until you click on the little &#8220;remove me&#8221; link and hope that it doesn&#8217;t just spread your name to another dozen mailing lists, a\/k\/a the presumption is that anyone can send you spam until you tell each individual sender that you don&#8217;t want it) .  The past proposals for an opt-<i>in <\/i>system (where you don&#8217;t get anything unless you explicitly ask for it) are, in the DMA&#8217;s eyes, a non-starter.<\/p>\n<p>Now, that having been said, I&#8217;m opposed to most anti-spam legislation.  Problem is, given the international nature of the Net, it&#8217;s not likely to appreciably reduce the crap that infests my mailbox daily (much of which is mailed from or through China, Europe, etc.).  And, frankly, I don&#8217;t feel a great need to pass legislation to help DMA members compete more successfully than their less prosperous (but equally unsavory) brethren.<\/p>\n<p>Still, if even the DMA thinks that spam is a problem &#8230; well, it does give one hope.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Direct Marketing Association has long opposed anti-spam laws. After all, their members make a living through direct marketing &#8230; i.e., spam. Problem is, &#8220;big fleas have lesser fleas,&#8221; and&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3594","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-spam"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2249,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2002\/07\/19\/spam_spam_spam.html","url_meta":{"origin":3594,"position":0},"title":"Spam, spam, spam, spam &#8230;","author":"***Dave","date":"Fri 19-Jul-02 4:17pm","format":false,"excerpt":"From this week's Onion: Anti-Spam Legislation Opposed by Powerful Penis-Enlargement Lobby. \"The penis enlargers have shrewdly formed a coalition with other industries that depend heavily upon mass e-mail, including the...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Spam&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Spam","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/computer-security\/spam"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":40,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2003\/07\/08\/slamming_spam_t.html","url_meta":{"origin":3594,"position":1},"title":"Slamming spam, the legislative way","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 8-Jul-03 1:48pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Spam is in the news these days, as anti-spam bills flutter through Congress. In the lead, currently, is the all-too-cute Reduction in Distribution (RID) of Spam Act. It has the...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Blogging &amp; Internet&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Blogging &amp; Internet","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8227,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2006\/01\/17\/spam_spam_spam.html","url_meta":{"origin":3594,"position":2},"title":"Spam, spam, spam, spam &#8230;","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 17-Jan-06 6:15pm","format":false,"excerpt":"My Internet host, Hosting Matters, is rolling out a new anti-spam system to its various servers, and it finally got to mine. The new system, MailScanner, still uses the SpamAssassin...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Spam&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Spam","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/computer-security\/spam"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4754,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2004\/01\/12\/spam_strategies.html","url_meta":{"origin":3594,"position":3},"title":"Spam strategies","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 12-Jan-04 11:10am","format":false,"excerpt":"I've been having pretty good success with MT-Blacklist in blocking (or removing) comment spam. The approach it takes is interesting. Rather than trying to track IP addresses (which can be...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Spam&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Spam","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/computer-security\/spam"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3977,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2003\/03\/05\/missing_the_poi.html","url_meta":{"origin":3594,"position":4},"title":"Missing the point","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 5-Mar-03 7:22am","format":false,"excerpt":"How, um, stupid is it to send an unsolicited commercial e-mail to someone touting how great your spam filtering software is? Yeah, that's what I thought, too....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Spam&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Spam","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/computer-security\/spam"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5135,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2003\/10\/28\/monoculture_and.html","url_meta":{"origin":3594,"position":5},"title":"Monoculture and spam","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 28-Oct-03 8:06pm","format":false,"excerpt":"As previously noted, monocultures are dangerous in horticulture. While they maximize the favorable traits, they also make a species vulnerable to attack by disease. So, too, is monoculture in anti-spam....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Blogging &amp; Internet&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Blogging &amp; Internet","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3594","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3594"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3594\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3594"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3594"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3594"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}