{"id":39886,"date":"2013-12-04T16:15:29","date_gmt":"2013-12-04T23:15:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2013\/12\/04\/go-nuke-or-go-home.html"},"modified":"2013-12-11T11:06:55","modified_gmt":"2013-12-11T18:06:55","slug":"go-nuke-or-go-home","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2013\/12\/04\/go-nuke-or-go-home.html","title":{"rendered":"Go nuke or go home!"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"gpb-content\">While admitting that the goal of keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of Iran is a non-trivial task, I find it remarkable that Rep. Hunter (R-CA) can speak so casually of dropping nuclear weapons on Iran (&quot;tactical&quot; ones, to be sure, but that just means Hiroshima-size) as (if I can\u00a0quote another, more fictional nuke-suggester) &quot;the only way to be sure.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>Granted, he&#39;s offering that as a better alternative to boot-on-the-ground invasion, which he rightfully recognizes would be extremely costly in US lives (presumably his Marine Corps experience in Afghanistan and Iraq informs him about that).<\/p>\n<p>But the idea that the US would preemptively use nuclear weapons, and be the first to use them since their solitary, horrifying deployment in\u00a0WWII, would be a moral and geopolitical outrage from which the US would never recover &#8212; and rightfully so.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reshared post from +<a href='https:\/\/plus.google.com\/101364383784977781980'>Jeffrey Raskin<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><b>GOP House Member Says Attack On Iran\u00a0Should Be Nuclear<\/b><\/p>\n<p>&quot;I don\u2019t think it\u2019s inevitable but I think if you have to hit Iran, you don\u2019t put boots on the ground, <b>you do it with tactical nuclear devices and you set them back a decade or two or three<\/b>. I think that\u2019s the way to do it with a massive aerial bombardment campaign.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>This is the face of Today&#39;s GOP. These people are not &quot;conservative.&quot;\u00a0 They are radical reactionaries.\ufeff<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<p class='gpb-article' style='clear:both;'>\n<div style='height:120px;width:120px;overflow:hidden;float:left;margin-top:0px;padding-top:0px;margin-right:10px;vertical-align:top;text-align:center;clear:both;'>\n                                                    <img style='max-width:none;' src='https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/proxy\/a9nzauUba4krgxlZavEQz3a8YuX1hqqTGWyIZqMZoOvVDLaYKBkpQgVyRztciU5FwQKZyiBPGz3o4pK0uZaYP7JjFMkjQMjnIjBK9ZIRlbuDNV0ATrR8uJyzfadqoRw=w120-h120' border='0' \/>\n                                                <\/div>\n<p>                                                <a href='http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/security\/2013\/12\/04\/3018431\/duncan-hunter-iran-nukes\/'>Congressman Says U.S. Should Use Nuclear Weapons If It Attacks Iran<\/a><br \/>\n                                                Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) thinks the United States should use tactical nuclear weapons on Iran if it decides to use military force against its nuclear program. \n                                            <\/p>\n<p class='gpb-links' style='clear:both;'> <a class='gpb-linkback' href='https:\/\/plus.google.com\/101083456815352083930\/posts\/XiJNvtnT2dm' target='_new'>View this post on Google+<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While admitting that the goal of keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of Iran is a non-trivial task, I find it remarkable that Rep. Hunter (R-CA) can speak so casually of dropping nuclear weapons on Iran (&quot;tactical&quot; ones, to be sure, but that just means Hiroshima-size) as (if I can\u00a0quote another, more fictional nuke-suggester) &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2013\/12\/04\/go-nuke-or-go-home.html\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Go nuke or go home!&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[106,100,10,349],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-plusposts","category-dolts","category-geopolitical-brouhaha","category-military"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":26700,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/02\/28\/mullahs-with-nukes.html","url_meta":{"origin":39886,"position":0},"title":"Mullahs with Nukes","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 28-Feb-12 7:21am","format":false,"excerpt":"Will Iran get the Bomb? Probably so -- hard to believe how they could not, eventually.And, from a fairness perspective, why not? It's like that recent Onion headline, \"Iran concerned that US may soon build 8,531st nuclear weapon\".From a pragmatic perspective -- i.e., in terms of who we want to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":45607,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/09\/30\/looks-like-nuke-times-again.html","url_meta":{"origin":39886,"position":1},"title":"Looks Like Nuke Times Again","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 30-Sep-14 9:55pm","format":false,"excerpt":"So what's most disturbing in this article?- A major radiation incident at the WIPP facility, leading to a shutdown and growing backlog of nuclear waste storage?- Investigations into same that indicate all sorts of problems with the operations at WIPP?- Proposals to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to build\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":23785,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2011\/11\/16\/fear-of-the-nuclear-mullahs.html","url_meta":{"origin":39886,"position":2},"title":"Fear of the Nuclear Mullahs","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 16-Nov-11 1:01pm","format":false,"excerpt":"An interesting article that eventually gets around to asking what all the concern is about a nuclear-armed Iran -- pointing out how nuclear weapons hasn't allowed anyone -- from the US to the USSR to China, as well as Israel and India and S Africa and Pakistan and N Korea\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":26853,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/03\/05\/iran-nukes-and-the-future-or-lack-thereof.html","url_meta":{"origin":39886,"position":3},"title":"Iran, nukes, and the future (or lack thereof)","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 5-Mar-12 3:13pm","format":false,"excerpt":"I don't think anyone wants a nuclear-armed Iran. But the article suggests that such a potential (not inevitable) circumstance is not necessarily the disaster it's being portrayed as. What would much more certainly be a disaster is an overt military attempt to prevent Iran from getting such weapons. #ddtbReshared post\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":137151,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2018\/09\/12\/because-of-course-trump-wants-more-nukes-and-less-nuke-worker-safety.html","url_meta":{"origin":39886,"position":4},"title":"Because of course Trump wants more nukes and less nuke worker safety","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 12-Sep-18 2:10pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Donald is ramping up production of more nuclear warheads, while at the same time slashing the size and the authority of the agency tasked with making sure nuclear warhead production is safe. Because of course he is. White House Hobbles Nuclear Weapons Safety Agency As Trump calls for new bomb\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/nuclear-weapons-plant.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":133788,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2017\/07\/03\/pentagon-fixes-bad-grades-on-nuke-handling-by-making-them-secret.html","url_meta":{"origin":39886,"position":5},"title":"Pentagon fixes bad grades on nuke handling by making them secret","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 3-Jul-17 10:54am","format":false,"excerpt":"Because hiding performance data always improves performance! Or at least lets you pretend it's improved.\u275d Overall results of routine inspections at nuclear weapons bases, such as a \"pass-fail\" grade, had previously been publicly available. They are now off-limits. The change goes beyond the standard practice of withholding detailed information on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39886"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39886\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40000,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39886\/revisions\/40000"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}