{"id":40264,"date":"2014-01-01T14:59:14","date_gmt":"2014-01-01T21:59:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/01\/01\/all-your-computers-are-belong-to-us.html"},"modified":"2014-01-07T11:21:50","modified_gmt":"2014-01-07T18:21:50","slug":"all-your-computers-are-belong-to-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/01\/01\/all-your-computers-are-belong-to-us.html","title":{"rendered":"All your computers are belong to us"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"gpb-content\">A judge rules that border searches of computers and phones, for any (or no reason) whatsoever, are perfectly legal because (a) they have obviously (though not in publicly presented evidence) been important in preventing Many Horrible Terrorist Acts, and vaguely handwaved \u00a0Evil Terrorists allow any and all rights to be suspended, and (b) people who travel internationally don&#39;t really need to bring phones and computers if they are afraid of confidential information being searched. No, really. Leave your laptop at home. \u00a0Just, y&#39;know, rent one over there. Or something.<\/p>\n<p>Besides, the NSA has already read it.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, and nobody who hasn&#39;t actually been searched has any standing because (maybe) there aren&#39;t a lot of searches going on every day (at the moment; I&#39;m sure the court will actively monitor the practice for some magical number of too many to be reached). Of course, there aren&#39;t a lot of terror attacks every day, either, but, hey, logic only works so far, right?<\/p>\n<p>And, of course, the policy is that &quot;at the border&#39;&quot; means within 100 miles of an international border. For now.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reshared post from +<a href='https:\/\/plus.google.com\/108799184931623330498'>Brandon Downey<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A disappointing decision, but not unsurprising.<\/p>\n<p>The only sad part is the judge questioning the need to travel with electronic devices, after which he returned home on a horse and buggy waiting outside.\ufeff<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<p class='gpb-article' style='clear:both;'>\n<div style='height:120px;width:120px;overflow:hidden;float:left;margin-top:0px;padding-top:0px;margin-right:10px;vertical-align:top;text-align:center;clear:both;'>\n                                                    <img style='max-width:none;' src='https:\/\/lh4.googleusercontent.com\/proxy\/0rkcsx0XxU-3RMbCFxQnXHXre2cuLjKpMcRgeipD8hknCTOZC-vlcNs2Uk4W1Tz4zi9Wuu88zygKi6suARFl1PWSsNl0EBw-TCj4aBOOX2fX_3QX9HGg3bFZRyiQ-J4Ew5fWKp6IhD61uweGdPkoBA=w120-h120' border='0' \/>\n                                                <\/div>\n<p>                                                <a href='http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2014\/01\/01\/business\/judge-upholds-us-right-to-search-devices-at-border.html?pagewanted=all&#038;_r=0'>District Judge Upholds Government\u2019s Right to Search Electronics at Border<\/a><br \/>\n                                                Judge Edward R. Korman of the Eastern District of New York found that the government does not need reasonable suspicion to examine or confiscate a traveler&#8217;s electronic device.\n                                            <\/p>\n<p class='gpb-links' style='clear:both;'> <a class='gpb-linkback' href='https:\/\/plus.google.com\/101083456815352083930\/posts\/1HVTmyDrYgV' target='_new'>View this post on Google+<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A judge rules that border searches of computers and phones, for any (or no reason) whatsoever, are perfectly legal because (a) they have obviously (though not in publicly presented evidence) been important in preventing Many Horrible Terrorist Acts, and vaguely handwaved \u00a0Evil Terrorists allow any and all rights to be suspended, and (b) people who &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/01\/01\/all-your-computers-are-belong-to-us.html\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;All your computers are belong to us&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[106,17,132],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40264","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-plusposts","category-homeland-security","category-privacy"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":128544,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2015\/11\/04\/your-laptop-is-not-just-a-container-legally-at-least.html","url_meta":{"origin":40264,"position":0},"title":"Your laptop is not just a &quot;container&quot; (legally, at least)","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 4-Nov-15 11:36pm","format":false,"excerpt":"A judge has ruled that laptops are more than just crates and cargo that can be willy-nilly seized and searched -- without a warrant -- in the border zone or at international airports. Rather, based on SCOTUS precedent, they can be presumed to hold so much private information that a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":133100,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2017\/03\/19\/the-supreme-court-unanimously-rules-cell-phone-searches-require-a-warrant.html","url_meta":{"origin":40264,"position":1},"title":"The Supreme Court unanimously rules cell phone searches require a warrant","author":"***Dave","date":"Sun 19-Mar-17 5:36pm","format":false,"excerpt":"It's rare you get SCOTUS ruling unanimously on anything of major import, especially related to civil rights, but they did here:'\u201cModern cell phones are not just another technological convenience. With all they contain and all they may reveal, they hold for many Americans \u2018the privacies of life,\u2019\u201d Chief Justice John\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":43253,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/06\/25\/scotus-no-cell-phone-searches-without-a-warrant.html","url_meta":{"origin":40264,"position":2},"title":"SCOTUS &#8211; No cell phone searches without a warrant","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 25-Jun-14 3:43pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Wow. You don't get a lot of unanimous rulings from the Supreme Court these days, but here's one of them.'Cellphones are unlike anything else police may find on someone they arrest, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court. They are \"not just another technological convenience,\" he said, but ubiquitous,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":41244,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/02\/28\/secure-in-their-persons-houses-papers-and-effects.html","url_meta":{"origin":40264,"position":3},"title":"&quot;Secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects&quot;","author":"***Dave","date":"Fri 28-Feb-14 3:11pm","format":false,"excerpt":"In Texas, at least, the police can't go searching on\u00a0your phone without a warrant -- at least not while it's sitting in the property room. As the majority opinion had it:'The Fourth Amendment states that \u201c[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8345,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2005\/12\/08\/a_slight_bit_of.html","url_meta":{"origin":40264,"position":4},"title":"A slight bit of sanity slips into airport security","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 8-Dec-05 11:35am","format":false,"excerpt":"The TSA is no longer (as) worried that folks with sewing scissors might try to hijack a plane. Major new changes in airport security includes relaxing restrictions on some carry-on...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Homeland Security&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Homeland Security","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/politics-law\/homeland-security"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9554,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2006\/06\/05\/all_your_intern.html","url_meta":{"origin":40264,"position":5},"title":"All your Internet traffic are belong to U.S.","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 5-Jun-06 3:20pm","format":false,"excerpt":"\"No, we don't want e-mail content (yet), just the ability to get a list of everyone that anyone sent an e-mail to, or anyone who sent an e-mail to a...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Homeland Security&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Homeland Security","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/politics-law\/homeland-security"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40264","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40264"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40264\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40370,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40264\/revisions\/40370"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40264"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40264"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}