{"id":43319,"date":"2014-07-02T12:25:50","date_gmt":"2014-07-02T18:25:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/07\/02\/if-everyone-were-already-being-reasonable.html"},"modified":"2014-07-02T17:54:13","modified_gmt":"2014-07-02T23:54:13","slug":"if-everyone-were-already-being-reasonable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/07\/02\/if-everyone-were-already-being-reasonable.html","title":{"rendered":"If everyone were already being reasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"gpb-content\">I worry when courts, analysts, and the plaintiffs all wave off objections about how they don&#39;t think some adverse reading of a ruling is &quot;likely&quot; to happen, or that &quot;few&quot; folk will &quot;probably&quot; act a certain way that might make things worse. \u00a0It seems like that sort of guesswork (some of which comes across as disingenuous, to say the least) should factor into how the ruling is written in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, I do indeed expect to see a <i>lot<\/i> of litigation based on <i>Hobby Lobby,<\/i> and lots of conflicting rulings, which means we&#39;ll see this circle up back with SCOTUS again in a few years. Who knows how things will be ruled then?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reshared post from +<a href='https:\/\/plus.google.com\/103213250297401521193'>Frederick Wilson II<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<p class='gpb-article' style='clear:both;'>\n<div style='overflow:hidden;margin-top:0px;padding-top:0px;margin-right:10px;vertical-align:top;text-align:center;clear:both;'>\n                                                    <img style='max-width:none;' src='https:\/\/lh4.googleusercontent.com\/proxy\/f1wM99_uvk3Zk4rL6VMhdm_sKgUTXZfMscTESYSSpErORJtQ1jq40M2ZHaFMJr7LNkRosDPS_KJLHtcJuwPe=w506-h303-p' border='0' \/>\n                                                <\/div>\n<p>                                                <a href='http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2014-06-30\/court-birth-control-ruling-opens-door-to-more-challenges.html'>Obamacare Benefits Unlikely to Be Cut Under Court Ruling<\/a><br \/>\n                                                Small companies across the U.S. will be forced to make hard decisions about whether to offer employees coverage for contraception following yesterday\u2019s Supreme Court ruling.\n                                            <\/p>\n<p class='gpb-links' style='clear:both;'> <a class='gpb-linkback' href='https:\/\/plus.google.com\/101083456815352083930\/posts\/FFAo7jvEPdd' target='_new'>View this post on Google+<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I worry when courts, analysts, and the plaintiffs all wave off objections about how they don&#39;t think some adverse reading of a ruling is &quot;likely&quot; to happen, or that &quot;few&quot; folk will &quot;probably&quot; act a certain way that might make things worse. \u00a0It seems like that sort of guesswork (some of which comes across as &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/07\/02\/if-everyone-were-already-being-reasonable.html\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;If everyone were already being reasonable&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[106,109,134,348],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-plusposts","category-church-state","category-health-care","category-women"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2421,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2002\/06\/26\/one_nation_goin.html","url_meta":{"origin":43319,"position":0},"title":"One nation going bonkers","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 26-Jun-02 8:04pm","format":false,"excerpt":"As one might have predicted, politicians (of both parties) are going nuts over the Pledge of Allegience ruling. President Bush considers the ruling \"ridiculous.\" \"The Supreme Court itself begins each...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Politics &amp; Law&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Politics &amp; Law","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/politics-law"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":32982,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2013\/04\/01\/a-tech-trademark-ruling-that-makes-sense.html","url_meta":{"origin":43319,"position":1},"title":"A Tech Trademark Ruling that Makes Sense","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 1-Apr-13 10:05am","format":false,"excerpt":"The Trademark Office says that TMing \"iPad\" is fine, but TMing the word \"Mini\" is not, any more than Coke should be allowed to TM \"Diet\" in \"Diet Coke\". US Trademark Office says the \u201cmini\u201d in iPad mini is \u201cmerely descriptive\u201d Apple has until July 24 to modify its trademark\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":27319,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/04\/03\/oh-and-by-the-way-about-that-strip-search-ruling-by-scotus.html","url_meta":{"origin":43319,"position":2},"title":"Oh, and by the way, about that Strip Search ruling by SCOTUS?","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 3-Apr-12 6:03pm","format":false,"excerpt":"It was argued for by the Obama Dept. of Justice.Yes, given a binary choice between Obama and [any GOP candidate running], he's the one I'm going to vote for, because in some ways he's better, and in other ways less worse than the Republican field. But by the same token,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"http:\/\/images0-focus-opensocial.googleusercontent.com\/gadgets\/proxy?container=focus&gadget=a&resize_h=100&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.salon.com%2F2012%2F04%2Falbert-florence-460x307.png","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":30664,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/10\/17\/warner-wins-big-superman-ruling-vs-schuster-estate.html","url_meta":{"origin":43319,"position":3},"title":"Warner wins big Superman ruling vs Schuster estate","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 17-Oct-12 9:01pm","format":false,"excerpt":"I suspect we'll see an appeal.Reshared post from +Comicbook.comA judge has ruled that the family of Joe Shuster cannot pursue the copyrights to Superman. Embedded Link Warner Scores Major Victory in Superman Trial A U.S. District Court judge has ruled that a 1992 agreement between the heirs of Superman co-creator\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/images0-focus-opensocial.googleusercontent.com\/gadgets\/proxy?container=focus&gadget=a&resize_h=100&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcomicbook.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F10%2FSuperman-First-Comic-Action-Comics-No-1-222x300.jpg","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":49393,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2015\/01\/27\/ten-commandments-judge-cries-tyranny-over-gay-marriage-ruling.html","url_meta":{"origin":43319,"position":4},"title":"&quot;Ten Commandments&quot; judge cries &quot;Tyranny!&quot; over gay marriage ruling","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 27-Jan-15 3:29pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Ah, Roy Moore -- did you never meet a federal court ruling you thought didn't apply to you?Quoth Moore: \"As you know, nothing in the United States Constitution grants the federal government the authority to redefine the institution of marriage.\"No, but the 14th Amendment does allow the federal government (in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":43315,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2014\/07\/01\/just-in-case-you-thought-hobby-lobby-was-a-narrowly-defined-ruling.html","url_meta":{"origin":43319,"position":5},"title":"Just in case you thought Hobby Lobby was a narrowly defined ruling&#8230;","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 1-Jul-14 5:17pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Just in case you thought Hobby Lobby was a narrowly defined ruling...There are plenty of folk who think otherwise, and are leaping on the ruling as a basis for companies being able to discriminate against gays in hiring, firing, or as customers. After all, if it's all about the sincerely-held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43319"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43319\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43332,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43319\/revisions\/43332"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}