{"id":458,"date":"2003-04-10T15:14:15","date_gmt":"2003-04-10T20:14:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/?p=458"},"modified":"2003-04-10T15:14:15","modified_gmt":"2003-04-10T20:14:15","slug":"filter_tips","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2003\/04\/10\/filter_tips.html","title":{"rendered":"Filter tips"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Google is under fire for its opt-in <a title=\"Report criticizes Google's porn filters | CNET News.com\" href=\"http:\/\/msnbc-cnet.com.com\/2100-1032-996417.html?type=pt&#038;part=msnbc&#038;tag=alert&#038;form=feed&#038;subj=cnetnews\">porn filter<\/a>.  A new <a href=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/people\/edelman\/google-safesearch\/\">study <\/a>says that it blocks a lot of non-porn sites.<\/p>\n<p class=\"block\">Some of the URLs listed in the listings below might be construed as sexually-explicit &#8212; for example, for the purpose of providing information about health or sexual education, or describing efforts to regulate pornography. However, most of the URLs listed seem to be misclassified by Google as sexually explicit. For example, it is unlikely that there is sexually-explicit content on thomas.loc.gov (the Library of Congress&#8217;s index of federal legislation), pmo.gov.il (the Israeli Prime Minister&#8217;s Office), nmsa.org (the National Middle School Association), or neu.edu (the main index page of Northeastern University), but all four are excluded from Google searches using SafeSearch.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m a lot less upset about this than some other recent porn filter news, largely because the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/safesearch_help.html\">Google setting <\/a>is an opt-in sort of thing.  People have to turn it on explicitly (so to speak), and it reasonably tends to be overly protective in (through automation) blocking sites.  I worry a lot more about when filtering is required by law than when it&#8217;s something voluntarily turned on &#8212; and while clearly there&#8217;s room for improvement in Google&#8217;s algorithms, better &#8220;safe&#8221; than &#8220;sorry,&#8221; if you really want to block out stuff from Little Johnny&#8217;s Eyes &#8212; though the report notes a number of false (or questionable) negatives, too.<\/p>\n<p>(If you&#8217;re curious, the <a href=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/people\/edelman\/google-safesearch\/\">report <\/a>includes a form where you can try your own site or search term to see if SafeSearch blocks it.)<\/p>\n<p>The report does give kudos to Google for make it clear when SafeSearch is turned on.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless, and despite Google&#8217;s press flacks, I think most folks would agree with the study&#8217;s conclusions:<\/p>\n<p class=\"block\">SafeSearch&#8217;s errors confirm the author&#8217;s sense, reflected in prior research, that accurate Internet filtering is an extraordinarily difficult task still well beyond the reach of current algorithms and methods.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Google is under fire for its opt-in porn filter. A new study says that it blocks a lot of non-porn sites. Some of the URLs listed in the listings below&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-458","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-zt-pc"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5273,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2004\/04\/14\/yeah_because_th.html","url_meta":{"origin":458,"position":0},"title":"Yeah, because this will work, you betcha","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 14-Apr-04 11:45am","format":false,"excerpt":"The FTC has decreed, based on Congressional anti-spam mandates, that all porn spam must be explicitly (so to speak) labelled. Starting May 19, sexually explicit e-mail will have to bear...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Spam&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Spam","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/computer-security\/spam"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2815,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2002\/09\/18\/doctor_in_the_h.html","url_meta":{"origin":458,"position":1},"title":"Doctor in the house","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 18-Sep-02 4:22pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Here's a witty little piece from the Daily Standard on the health aspects of being a porn star. Of course, my favorite part was this particularly fun turn of phrase:...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Media &amp; Culture&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Media &amp; Culture","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/media"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12259,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2008\/06\/12\/image_problem.html","url_meta":{"origin":458,"position":2},"title":"Image problem","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 12-Jun-08 10:29pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Sauce for the gander. An obscenity trial in the US has been suspended after the judge overseeing it acknowledged that his own website featured sexually explicit images. Federal appeals court...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;ZT &amp; PC&quot;","block_context":{"text":"ZT &amp; PC","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/zt-pc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":130425,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2016\/04\/14\/cracking-shortened-urls-has-some-weirdly-scary-results.html","url_meta":{"origin":458,"position":3},"title":"Cracking shortened URLs has some weirdly scary results","author":"***Dave","date":"Thu 14-Apr-16 10:44pm","format":false,"excerpt":"URL shorteners remain a big thing, if only because some sites have crazy-awful URLs that they generate, and URL shorteners make it a lot easier to cut-and-paste those links in.[1]But some researchers have found that when you create such a link, it somehow (through the magic of bit.ly, for example),\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;~PlusPosts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8287,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2005\/12\/27\/google_proxy.html","url_meta":{"origin":458,"position":4},"title":"Google proxy","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 27-Dec-05 5:23pm","format":false,"excerpt":"While some companies (and locations) block access to certain websites, you can (possibly) easily get around said blocks via Google -- by telling it to translate your target page from\/to...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hi-Tech&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hi-Tech","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/hi-tech"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6581,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2004\/08\/16\/careful_study.html","url_meta":{"origin":458,"position":5},"title":"Careful study","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 16-Aug-04 3:59pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Just as the Australian government is locked in debate about the best way to shelter its citizenry from pornography, a government-sponsored study yas determined that, well, it's not all that...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;ZT &amp; PC&quot;","block_context":{"text":"ZT &amp; PC","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/zt-pc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=458"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/458\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}