{"id":9706,"date":"2006-05-05T20:21:31","date_gmt":"2006-05-06T03:21:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp\/2006\/05\/05\/i-am-the-very-model-of-the-haughty-intellectual.html"},"modified":"2006-05-05T20:21:31","modified_gmt":"2006-05-06T03:21:31","slug":"i_am_the_very_m","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2006\/05\/05\/i_am_the_very_m.html","title":{"rendered":"I am the very model of the Haughty Intellectual …"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n
Haughty Intellectual<\/b><\/font>
You are 57% Rational, 0% Extroverted, 42% Brutal, and 57% Arrogant. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
You are the Haughty Intellectual. You are a very rational person, emphasizing logic over emotion, and you are also rather arrogant and self-aggrandizing. You probably think of yourself as an intellectual, and you would like everyone to know it. Not only that, but you also tend to look down on others, thinking yourself better than them. You could possibly have an unhealthy obsession with yourself as well, thus causing everyone to hate you for being such an elitist twat. On top of all that, you are also introverted and gentle. This means that you are just a quiet thinker who wants fame and recognition, in all likelihood. Like so many countless pseudo-intellectuals swarming around vacuous internet forums to discuss worthless political issues, your kind is a scourge upon humanity, blathering and blathering on and on about all kinds of boring crap. If your personality could be sculpted, the resulting piece would be Rodin’s “The Thinker”–although I am absolutely positive that you are not nearly as muscular or naked as that statue. Rather lacking in emotion, introspective, gentle, and arrogant, you are most certainly a Haughty Intellectual! And, most likely, you will never achieve the recognition or fame you so desire! But no worries!<\/p>\n

\nTo put it less negatively:<\/b>\n<\/p>\n

1. You are more RATIONAL than intuitive.
\n<\/i><\/p>\n

2. You are more INTROVERTED than extroverted.
\n<\/i><\/p>\n

3. You are more GENTLE than brutal.
\n<\/i><\/p>\n

4. You are more ARROGANT than humble.<\/i>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Compatibility:<\/b><\/p>\n

\nYour exact opposite is the Schoolyard Bully<\/a>. (Bullies like to beat up nerds, after all.)<\/p>\n

\nOther personalities you would probably get along with are the Braggart<\/a>, the Hand-Raiser<\/a>, and the Robot<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n

\nIf you scored near fifty percent for a certain trait (42%-58%), you could very well go either way. For example, someone with 42% Extroversion is slightly leaning towards being an introvert, but is close enough to being an extrovert to be classified that way as well. <\/i>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n
My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender<\/i>:<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"free<\/a><\/td>\n\"free<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\nYou scored higher than 31%<\/b> on Rationality<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"free<\/a><\/td>\n\"free<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\nYou scored higher than 0%<\/b> on Extroversion<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"free<\/a><\/td>\n\"free<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\nYou scored higher than 52%<\/b> on Brutality<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\n\n\n
\"free<\/a><\/td>\n\"free<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\nYou scored higher than 64%<\/b> on Arrogance<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/blockquote>\n

<\/span> <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n
Link: The Personality Defect Test<\/a> written by saint_gasoline<\/a> on Ok Cupid<\/a>, home of the 32-Type Dating Test<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Haughty Intellectual You are 57% Rational, 0% Extroverted, 42% Brutal, and 57% Arrogant. You are the Haughty Intellectual. You are a very rational person, emphasizing logic over emotion, and…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9706","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-personality-tests"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5538,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2004\/02\/24\/rising_again_to.html","url_meta":{"origin":9706,"position":0},"title":"Rising again to eat the votes of the living!","author":"***Dave","date":"Tue 24-Feb-04 1:58pm","format":false,"excerpt":"I dislike folks who use attacks on folks' physical appearance in lieu of their positions. Thus I dislike references to \"haughty, French-looking Kerry\" or \"Monkey-Boy Bush.\" Or, for that matter,...","rel":"","context":"In "Politics & Law"","block_context":{"text":"Politics & Law","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/politics-law"},"img":{"alt_text":"Night of the Living Ralphs!","src":"\/blog\/images\/nader.jpg","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":23711,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2011\/11\/14\/the-candidate-is-turning-into-a-newt.html","url_meta":{"origin":9706,"position":1},"title":"The Candidate Is Turning into a Newt","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 14-Nov-11 11:21am","format":false,"excerpt":"There have been several polls showing a surge for Newt Gingrch's GOP candidacy for President, though this is the most favorable one. Apparently the faltering of both Cain and Perry is benefiting Newt a lot more than Romney (who is pretty soundly disliked by the Right).How this will translate into\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":21744,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2011\/07\/27\/unblogged-bits-wed-27-jul-11-2330.html","url_meta":{"origin":9706,"position":2},"title":"Unblogged Bits (Wed. 27-Jul-11 2330)","author":"***Dave","date":"Wed 27-Jul-11 11:30pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries .... An Interview with the Batgirl of the SDCC panels - Honestly speaking, the picture of the JLA panel with ten men and no women ... pretty much says it all. The Purpose-Driven Lie -\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Comics & Comic Books"","block_context":{"text":"Comics & Comic Books","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/media\/media-comics"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":130350,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2016\/04\/02\/theres-intellectual-freedom-and-then-theres.html","url_meta":{"origin":9706,"position":3},"title":"There's intellectual freedom, and then there's","author":"***Dave","date":"Sat 2-Apr-16 5:31pm","format":false,"excerpt":"Heh. Originally shared by +Les Jenkins: Pie Comic by John McNamee TBT View on Google+","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":37810,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2013\/06\/14\/sanity-from-scotus-and-intellectual-property-law-inconceivable.html","url_meta":{"origin":9706,"position":4},"title":"Sanity from SCOTUS and Intellectual Property law? Inconceivable!","author":"***Dave","date":"Fri 14-Jun-13 8:21am","format":false,"excerpt":"But true!The Supreme Court ruled (unanimously!) that a company could not patent the concept of a test for a naturally occurring gene it had isolated and identified\u00a0because, basically, that's nature and basic science, not an invention.Bravo. Supreme Court: Patents Require 'An Act of Invention' UPDATE: Just hours after the Supreme\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":27068,"url":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/2012\/03\/12\/politics-and-the-moral-code.html","url_meta":{"origin":9706,"position":5},"title":"Politics and the Moral Code","author":"***Dave","date":"Mon 12-Mar-12 9:07pm","format":false,"excerpt":"While the article gets a bit too Omnipotently Psychoanalytical in places, I think there are some truths inside of it. A big one of which is that the liberal \/ Democrat mindset is expressed in a more policy wonkish fashion, and the conservative \/ Republican mindset is more moralistic --\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "~PlusPosts"","block_context":{"text":"~PlusPosts","link":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/category\/blogging\/plusposts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9706","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9706"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9706\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hill-kleerup.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}