https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Grups

The end of a generation gap, or Gen-Ys that just won’t grow up? Let’s start with a question. A few questions, actually: When did it become normal for your average…

The end of a generation gap, or Gen-Ys that just won’t grow up?

Let’s start with a question. A few questions, actually: When did it become normal for your average 35-year-old New Yorker to (a) walk around with an iPod plugged into his ears at all times, listening to the latest from Bloc Party; (b) regularly buy his clothes at Urban Outfitters; (c) take her toddler to a Mommy’s Happy Hour at a Brooklyn bar; (d) stay out till 4 A.M. because he just can’t miss the latest New Pornographers show, because who knows when Neko Case will decide to stop touring with them, and everyone knows she’s the heart of the band; (e) spend $250 on a pair of jeans that are artfully shredded to look like they just fell through a wheat thresher and are designed, eventually, to artfully fall totally apart; (f) decide that Sufjan Stevens is the perfect music to play for her 2-year-old, because, let’s face it, 2-year-olds have lousy taste in music, and we will not listen to the Wiggles in this house; (g) wear sneakers as a fashion statement; (h) wear the same vintage New Balance sneakers that he wore on his first day of school in the seventh grade as a fashion statement; (i) wear said sneakers to the office; (j) quit the office job because—you know what?—screw the office and screw jockeying for that promotion to VP, because isn’t promotion just another word for “slavery”?; (k) and besides, now that she’s a freelancer, working on her own projects, on her own terms, it’s that much easier to kick off in the middle of the week for a quick snowboarding trip to Sugarbush, because she’s got to have some balance, right? And she can write it off, too, because who knows? She might bump into Spike Jonze on the slopes; (l) wear a Misfits T-shirt; (m) make his 2-year-old wear a Misfits T-shirt; (n) never shave; (o) take pride in never shaving; (p) take pride in never shaving while spending $200 on a bedhead haircut and $600 on a messenger bag, because, seriously, only his grandfather or some frat-boy Wall Street flunky still carries a briefcase; or (q) all of the above?

Hmmmm. Do I know anyone like that?

Actually, while I know some folks who do, sorta-kinda-vaguely, I have to question the author’s assertion that it’s “not about a fad but about a phenomenon that looks to be permanent.” Maybe — just maybe — in New York or similar hip-trendy places (Kate? Comment?) — and maybe amongst certain demographic cohorts (reading the above, there sure seems to be a lot of emphasis on, well, availability to chunks of money), but while the Younger Generation I know here in Denver bears some relationship to the above (Doyce’s picture with Kaylee would fit right into the article’s photomontage), I think the point is way overblown and — well — at least somewhat a fad.

We won’t be going back to the Man in the Gray Flannel Suit any time soon — and thank goodness — but is it that profound of a cultural shift, of the sort described below?

It’s more interesting as evidence of the slow erosion of the long-held idea that in some fundamental way, you cross through a portal when you become an adult, a portal inscribed with the biblical imperative “When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: But when I became a man, I put away childish things.” This cohort is not interested in putting away childish things. They are a generation or two of affluent, urban adults who are now happily sailing through their thirties and forties, and even fifties, clad in beat-up sneakers and cashmere hoodies, content that they can enjoy all the good parts of being a grown-up (a real paycheck, a family, the warm touch of cashmere) with none of the bad parts (Dockers, management seminars, indentured servitude at the local Gymboree). It’s about a brave new world whose citizens are radically rethinking what it means to be a grown-up and whether being a grown-up still requires, you know, actually growing up.

Kids these days …

53 view(s)  

6 thoughts on “Grups”

  1. I’ve not read the whole article yet, but based off what you’ve quoted so far I’d have to admit that it sounds a bit like me. OK, I’m not particularly affluent and I’m not overly found of cashmere (mainly because it tends to be expensive), but I’m definitely of the beat-up-sneakers-distaste-for-dockers-and-management-seminars type of guy.

  2. There’s definitely a shift in things like dress code and what’s proper attire (and life-work balance) in the workforce — not just among 20 and 40 year olds, but across the workforce.

    I just got a sense from the article of something a lot further than that, some sort of entitled, self-indulgent, uber-yuppy, let-them-eat-cake, iconoclastic rich kids who can afford the cashmere hoodies and $600 messenger bags. Which just doesn’t sound like a new paradigm shift (but something I’d expect from New York Magazine). And I look on the Bold, Dramatic Vision of rejecting “Dockers, management seminars, indentured servitude at the local Gymboree” to be more than a bit glibly facile.

  3. I’m strictly a Dockers, Rockport, and EB Signature Twill guy (don’t even own a pare of jeans) but I long held out the hope that if we learned anything at all of value during the ’60’s, it is that what’s inside is what counts. All the external markers seem to have little to do with virtue, industry, intelligence and creativity.

  4. Reading this on a typical Friday in my NYC office, wearing jeans and a button down shirt, having conversations with folks in jeans and buttons down shirts, the guys with sneakers and casual blazers, the girls in funky shoes, I have to say — I have seen the future and it is us.

    Which is glib, but… yeah. Now, truth be told, there is no doubt that I work in a “creative” industry, one to which the Grups of the article may be drawn to. My older siblings in the banking industry much mor closely straddle the suits/sneakers divide — they’re maybe still able to buy the Seven jeans (and I know for a fact one of my sisters got a pair for Christmas from her husband), but they’re just as likely to buy the rest of their clothes from Ann Taylor or Talbots.

    What I found interesting in the New York article, which may not come across as obviously to a non-New Yorker, is how the Grups lifestyle portrayed is focused in Park Slope and Williamsburg, Tribeca and Soho. Downtown and Brooklyn. I like to think I’m somewhat trendy, but even I have walked down a street in Williamsburg and thought “I am so not cool enough to live here.” There is a kind of uniform, eerily depicted in the photo collages, but even those are really only the most basic.

    Which I think is funny, that for all their posturing about uniqueness, and forging their own paths, they all still dress the same, listen to the same music, go to the same places, shop at the same stores, and live in the same hip neighborhoods. I’d so much rather be my own person.

  5. “Everybody repeat after me the Non-Conformists Pledge! I promise to be different! I promise to be unique! I promise not to repeat things other people say!”
    — Steve Martin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *