https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

See! Without all those pollution laws, we'd be in great shape!

An interesting look at whether folks thought we might have global warming forty years back. Short answer: carbon dioxide was well recognized as both increasing and a greenhouse gas, but the effect was offset by particulate pollution, leading some to think we'd be facing global cooling .

We've made huge strides in dealing with particulate pollution (which is a very good thing for us to have done), but not about CO2, which is a good chunk of why we're where we are now with climate change. #ddtb

Embedded Link

What were scientists saying about global warming in 1971?
What did scientists know and say about climate change and global warming in the 1970s?  I keep running into claims by modern climate change denialists that scientists in the 1970s firmly predicted…

38 view(s)  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *