As the Wall Street Journal declines to run an article from 255 climate scientists at the National Academy of Science which confirms global warming, instead going with an article signed by 16 scientists, only 4 of whom are climatologists, arguing the reverse. That the WSJ is (a) traditionally hostile to climate change science and (b) is now owned by the Murdochs … well … should come as no surprise.
(More detail on the mis-science behind the WSJ's "experts" here: http://mediamatters.org/research/201201300008 ) #ddtb
Embedded Link
While temperatures rise, denialists reach lower | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine
Antiscience | climate change | Over the weekend, two amazingly bad articles were published about climate change. Both were loaded with mistakes, misinterpretations, and outright misinformatio
Meanwhile, the plant hardiness zone map changes and the Air Force puts up banks of solar generators.
@De – Boondoggle! Liberal pandering! Scientific conspiracy to put the UN in charge of the world! Help, help, I’m being oppressed by the Air Force and Burpee!