https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Just to show we’re not the only country with squirrelly laws and court rulings

The (an?) Australian Federal Court (although apparently this only has jurisdiction in the province of Victoria, appropriately enough) has ruled that in vitro fertilization (IVF) can be restricted from “lifestyle”…

The (an?) Australian Federal Court (although apparently this only has jurisdiction in the province of Victoria, appropriately enough) has ruled that in vitro fertilization (IVF) can be restricted from “lifestyle” lesbians (i.e., where there is presumed to be some choice about it), but not from “psychologically infertile” lesbians (who, for psychological reasons, cannot “do it” with a male). Goofiness ensues in the provincial government about what this means, what laws should therefore be passed, how to test for it, and whether it’s a good thing or not.

Meanwhile, charges have been dropped against a woman who violated laws against this already on the book.

(via JillMatrix)

37 view(s)  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *