The inspector general of the Dept. of Transportation has been running tests of airport security since 9/11. What’s been found — during a period when the highest level of security was being claimed, and supposedly pursued, is more than a bit dismaying.
– Investigators carried knives past screeners in more than 70% of tests.
– Screeners failed to spot guns in 30% of tests.
– Screeners failed to detect simulated explosive devices in 60% of tests.
– Overall, screeners failed to stop prohibited items in 48% of tests.
– Investigators either secretly boarded an aircraft or gained access to the airport tarmac in 48% of tests.
Now, we could look at this as a cup-half-full, and note that guns were spotted 70% of the time, etc. And if I were organizing some sort of large conspiracy to hi-jack several planes at the same time, I’d still be worried, since all it would take would be one or two of my guys getting caught to cause a massive shutdown of the air travel system.
But, still … this seems remarkably poor. What are all those X-rays, magnetometers, and other high tech thangs being used for, if the results are this bad? Especially since the results are worse than in similar tests run in the 70s and 80s.
I guess I was just unlucky that they spotted my corkscrew that time. Hopefully others with more sanguinary intent will be similarly unlucky, since it appears luck is our greatest protector right now.
Bring on the X-Ray Glasses and the frisk searches, baby!