https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

The Batman we never saw

Though it’s something of an embarrassment to his Grand Artiste biographers and fans, Orson Welles put substantial effort in 1946 into a Batman movie. The character was only ten years…

Though it’s something of an embarrassment to his Grand Artiste biographers and fans, Orson Welles put substantial effort in 1946 into a Batman movie.

The character was only ten years old then, and Welles was enthusiastic.

Gathering many of his old friends and colleagues together from “Citizen Kane,” he proposed “a cinematic experience, a kaleidoscope of heroism and nightmares and imagery seen nowhere save the subconscious of Goya or even Hawksmoor himself.” Welles planned Batman to be an adult psycho-drama, but combined with what he described as the “heart-racing excitement of the Saturday morning serials, given a respectable twist and a whole new style of kinetic direction unlike anything ever attempted in American cinema.”
[…] The real treat for me was the casting notes and confirmation letters from the actors themselves such as George Raft signing up for Two-Face (after Bogart turned it down), James Cagney as The Riddler, Basil Rathbone as The Joker and Welles’ former lover Marlene Dietrich as a very exotic Catwoman with the same salubrious past Miller gave the character forty years later in “Batman: Year One.” Robin was completely absent from the picture, but the casting of Batman himself was the main reason the picture stalled and was consigned to the history books. Welles wanted to cast himself in the roles of both Batman and Bruce Wayne, but the studio wanted to go with a more traditional leading man like Gregory Peck. Peck agreed and was reportedly even shot in a makeshift costume for the part during a break between filming “The Yearling” and the classic “Duel in the Sun.” Welles, however, was incensed at the decision. Despite being friends with Peck, he felt that this casting would completely compromise his vision and was especially angry at the studio’s suggestion that he should replace Rathbone as The Joker if he really a part in the picture.

Welles bailed on the project at that point, and it all came to a crashing halt.

The mind boggles, especially if you consider the cachet of respectibility (and artistic inspiration)such a movie could have given to the genre so early on. Amazing.

42 view(s)  

3 thoughts on “The Batman we never saw”

  1. Wow. “What If…”

    Of course, Batman was serialized in 1943, and again in 1949 (and Captain America in 1944, and Superman in ’48), but a Welles feature would have been Amazing, Incredible, Uncanny…

    I’ve seen the Batman serials. American Movie Classics showed them, one chapter a week, several years ago. They were most notable for having Robins that weren’t in their 20s! The first one is also a glimpse into America’s wartime prejudices (“Our wise government, having rounded up all the shifty-eyed Japs…” Eesh!).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *