As yet another reminder that actors are not, themselves, the characters they play, Patrick Stewart is speaking out against manned space travel.
“As I get older my unease at the time and the money that has to be spent on projects putting human beings back to the moon, and on to another planet, is so enormous,” he said.
“And it would take up so many resources, which I personally feel should be directed at our own planet.”
Lileks has the best rejoinder:
Making movies takes up many resources which could be directed at our own planet. For that matter, millions of pounds are spent in England annually for theater productions – I propose a ten-year moratorium on all stage shows, with the money distributed directly to our own planet. And after we have gotten things right on this planet we can get back to such frivolous luxuries as theater.
What’s that, you say – theater employs many people? Theater inspires imaginations, adds to our store of knowledge, helps us define what it means to be human?
And exploring other words doesn’t, eh. Noted: the future of humanity shall consist not in getting this place right but watching angry Pinter screeds about that wretched meat we know as our own flawed species. And when we leave the theater we can look up and behold an infinite world we must never pollute.
Ah Lileks…
He continues to show that a big forehead doesn’t necessarily mean big thoughts.
*sigh*
Well, I agree with him here (obviously).
Yabbut… the best view of Earth is from space. How else to get a global perspective?
I’d rather we spent some more money on space exploration, rather more money on social issues, and rather a lot less money on declaring an official government font.
Well, how much money was spent on declaring a (different) font? Not much, I suspect.
I think Patrick isn’t thinking straight since he dumped his wife for a 24 year old.