As has long been known in the legal and justice system, eyewitnesses see a lot less than they think. Indeed, as a survival mechanism, we tend to see or notice what we expect (or are on the alert) to see or notice, particularly when distracted by other tasks.
In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. After the door went by, the subjects were asked if they had noticed anything change.
Half of those tested failed to notice that, as the door passed by, the stranger had been substituted with a man who was of different height, of different build and who sounded different. He was also wearing different clothes.
Despite the fact that the subjects had talked to the stranger for 10-15 seconds before the swap, half of them did not detect that, after the passing of the door, they had ended up speaking to a different person. This phenomenon, called change blindness, highlights how we see much less than we think we do.
This probably ties into the whole “Not noticing when your spouse has gotten a new haircut/shaved off their beard” phenominon. If we’re not watching for a change, we’re a lot less likely to notice it.
Working with Christopher Chabris at Harvard University, Simons came up with another demonstration that has now become a classic, based on a videotape of a handful of people playing basketball. They played the tape to subjects and asked them to count the passes made by one of the teams.
Around half failed to spot a woman dressed in a gorilla suit who walked slowly across the scene for nine seconds, even though this hairy interloper had passed between the players and stopped to face the camera and thump her chest.
However, if people were simply asked to view the tape, they noticed the gorilla easily. The effect is so striking that some of them refused to accept they were looking at the same tape and thought that it was a different version of the video, one edited to include the ape.
Lots of interesting stuff in the article, including general limitations of being able to juggle attention to more than four items at once (which is probably part of the problem with cell phone usage in cars).
Cool article, with a link to videos some of the tests used.
(via BoingBoing)