https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Closed source as a legal defense

Evidently, DUI defendants in Seminole Co., Florida, who challenge their Breathlyzer tests in court based on their ability to examine the source code of the machines are getting their cases…

Evidently, DUI defendants in Seminole Co., Florida, who challenge their Breathlyzer tests in court based on their ability to examine the source code of the machines are getting their cases dismissed. The manufacturer refuses to show the code, which means they cannot prove the machines work, and so the tests are being thrown out.

Now if only we could get some judges to rule the same on voting machines …

Not that I have any truck with drunk drivers, by any means. But without being able to prove that a system works, either through rigorous, indepedent testing, or, more importantly, analysis of the source code, the room for abuse (or injustice) strikes me as too great.

(via BoingBoing)

28 view(s)  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *