https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

I speak for the trees!

So one of our Decision Points for the front yard re-landscape is trees. The plan has a large tree up top on the right corner of the patio, and two smaller…

So one of our Decision Points for the front yard re-landscape is trees. The plan has a large tree up top on the right corner of the patio, and two smaller trees, one in the middle off the sidewalk, the other in the upper left-hand corner by the driveway. Those are 20-30′ and 10-15′ range trees, respectively. Presumably the two smaller ones would be of the same species.

We got one suggestion from the landscapers, and have done some further research on our own. The Internet is both wonderful for this and a huge problem, as it can easily lead to option paralysis (plus trees height can vary in estimate tremendously, as you’ll see, sometimes based, I think, on region, other times on species (mis)identification.

So here’s what we have so far for options (we are, for reference, in USDA hardiness zone 5b, Sunset Zone 2). We consider recommendations from the CSU Extension and Plant Select to be particularly noteworthy.

The Big Tree 

WASATCH (BIGTOOTH, ROCKY MOUNTAIN SUGAR, WESTERN SUGAR, CANYON) MAPLE

‘FRONTIER’ HYBRID ELM

The Smaller Trees 

TATARIAN MAPLE (“HOT WINGS”)

PRINCESS KAY (P. K. CANADA) PLUM

BALI (EVANS, BALI EVANS, EVANS SOUR) CHERRY

So, that’s what we got. If anyone in the studio audience has some experience with any of these, I welcome hearing about it. My personal inclination (not yet agreed-upon with Margie) is the Wasatch Maple for the big tree, but I keep going in circles for the smaller ones.

93 view(s)  

3 thoughts on “I speak for the trees!”

  1. The only one I have any experience with is the sour cherry, which we had in the backyard in southwestern Ontario, where I grew up. (A far kinder climate than here in the Eastern Townships of Quebec.)

    I remember those wonderful sour cherries well. I tear up a little thinking about my stepmom’s amazing cherry pie and cherry jam.

    We had problems with birds taking one nip out of every cherry and then leaving the fruit to rot on the tree. (I want to say that robins and starlings were the culprits, but I’m not sure about that.) The only way we could ensure a harvest was to wrap the tree in cheese cloth just before the fruit would turn red.

    You might want to see if your have fruit napping birds where you live 🙂

    P.S.–Thanks for posting before pix. I’m fascinated to see how the pros do it.

  2. Elms don’t live terribly long. Out on the farm, we had a great yard full of elms that were planted when my dad was a kid. They started expiring just as we moved away, about 35 years later.

    I’m not sure of the particular variety, though.

  3. 1. I’m not a huge cherry fan, though having a large supply of it would probably provoke some serious cooking/baking efforts by Margie, which would be likely change my mind about it. Or maybe we’ll just let the birds eat them. 🙂

    2. I’m fascinated to see how the pros do it, too. I will plan on taking pictures, some to post immediately, some eventually.

    3. It’s hard to be tooooo concerned right now about what the status of the trees are likely to be in 35 years, but it is, in fact, worth thinking about.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *