https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

The fallacy of the "balanced approach" to deficit reduction

From those who have been given much, much will be asked (Luke 12:48).  Or, as Sen. Sanders put it ..

(h/t +Wendy Cockcroft)

Reshared post from +Phil Rounds

Google+: Reshared 1 times
Google+: View post on Google+

63 view(s)  

One thought on “The fallacy of the "balanced approach" to deficit reduction”

  1. I’m not at all sure I like that Bill Gates lunch analogy. I think it’s rather insulting to the janitor — assuming Gates would have lunch with his janitor. Where are they lunching? Was it a mutually agreeable date and place? I’ve split lunch bills with people who may not be in Gates’ territory, but certainly have at least 10 times the income I do. If two people say, “Let’s do lunch,” and agree on the location, they split the bill or at least each pays for her own.

    The rest of it, I agree with, definitely, just don’t think the lunch analogy is apt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *