https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Movie Review: "Diamonds Are Forever" (1971)

I'd forgotten how poor a movie this is.

Embedded Link

Dave Hill’s ★½ review of Diamonds Are Forever (1971) on Letterboxd.com
Wow. It’s been years since I watched this film — and it has not aged well. Connery, lured back after he’d missed an installment, is puffy, paunchy, balding, and just going through the motions. Charle…

Google+: View post on Google+

51 view(s)  

3 thoughts on “Movie Review: "Diamonds Are Forever" (1971)”

  1. Oh, come on. You had to like the chase scene with the moon rover, right? No? 😉

    The unintentional humor was funnier than the scripted jokes. Tiffany looks at a disrobed Bond and says “…there’s so much more to you than I expected,” and what we see is Connery’s stomach. >snort<

    You didn't mention the music. What about John Barry's score?

    1. The chance with the Moon Rover … was … right in keeping with what I was saying. (Complete with one scene of a Moon Rover tire bouncing in the foreground as one of the pursuing cars crashes). Sigh.

      Barry’s score was okay — not one of his best.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *