No, this is not the change we needed. My only guess is that there are too many Democratic Senators who don't want their own options to obstruct curtailed, so that this was the best deal Reid was able to get or willing to push for. Welcome to at least two more years of gridlock.
Embedded Link
Filibuster Deal Not Looking Like Actual Reform
The New York Times calls it “Bipartisan” in their headline, which is predictably a harbinger of miniscule change: The changes will surely disappoint reformers who were pushing for more …
Google+: View post on Google+
35 view(s)