https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Bullets don't care if they're fired by good guys or bad guys

NRA head Wayne LaPierre insists that "the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."  The problem is, sometimes good guys get "stopped" by other good guys with guns.  Whether it's kids accidentally shooting each other, or innocents caught by "friendly fire," guns can kill you just as dead if shot by a cop or a 5-year-old as by a thug or homicidal maniac.

Now that doesn't necessarily mean that guns should be banned.  Risk assessment is critical in this kind of public policy, and anecdotes about innocents being shot are no less and more anecdotes about innocents using a gun to avoid being murdered or raped.  

But the willful ignoring of the dangers of firearms, and the idea that if we just give everyone guns and make sure they are trained that everyone will be safe is … crazy.

College Student Accidentally Shot By Good Guy With A Gun
Late last week, 21 year old Hofstra University student Andrea Rebello was shot and killed during an attempted robbery in a group house near the Uniondale, New York campus. But the initial assumption — that Rebello was murdered by the suspected robber Dalton Smith during a shoot-out with police — now appears to be wrong. […]

32 view(s)  

5 thoughts on “Bullets don't care if they're fired by good guys or bad guys”

  1. No, TP's (and my) point is that guns don't automatically equate to safety, and the idea that if more people are armed and trained in firearm usage that we would automatically be safer doesn't hold water.

  2. I don't think anyone was saying it would "automatically" do anything, but being trained and being responsible and having a firearm is much better (and safer, despite what some would preach) than not having anything at all…

    …especially in coming up against someone who does have a gun and plans to use it for nefarious purposes.

    All the training in the world isn't going to make things 100%, foolproof, safe when it comes to gun violence, unfortunately, but for me and my family, it's the best option.

  3. And that's where the risk analysis comes in, both as a personal judgment and as a societal judgment.

    I am not as convinced that having a firearm, and being trained, and even being responsible, is in fact, better — especially when you're relying upon the other folks around you who are packing to also be trained and responsible. And, as you note, even training and responsibility won't make things 100% foolproof safe, as the tragic events in the case in the article points out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *