https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

On Political Lawsuits and Political Endgames

Can someone point me to something that actually explains what, legally, the House of Representatives is filing suit over? With what standing? To what actual end?  I mean, what court are they going into, and what result are they actually seeking?

Or, like their health care reform alternative, are they just posturing while (still) trying to figure out a concrete proposal?

(Also, has there been any similar law suit ever filed by Congress against a President? Doesn't that represent a breach of the separation of powers? And is anyone else amused at the irony of Republicans, who usually critique Democrats for seeking from the courts what they can't get at the ballot box … seeking from the courts what they can't get at the ballot box?)

Reshared post from +Les Jenkins

Embedded Link

John Boehner’s Monster
I have to tell you, Senator Obama is a decent person and a person you don’t have to be scared of as president of the United States. Quick, who said that? Senator Obama is a decent person. You don’t have to be scared of him …

72 view(s)  

2 thoughts on “On Political Lawsuits and Political Endgames”

  1. On top of that, they are suing him for acting without Congressional approval, then turning around on the border crisis and complaining that he’s not acting without Congress!

    1. @Solonor – I’m not sure the cases are directly analogous — but, then, the fundamental rationality of the House GOP to anything having to do with That Man in the White House never bears close examination.

Leave a Reply to Solonor Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *