+Oscar De Santiago He is, at the very least, a dolt, and played for stupid comic relief. Which is not a relief.
+zach vander berg While not thinking it's the greatest thing since sliced flarn, I think Abrams' ST reboot has been suitably entertaining, at least as much as most of the TOS or TNG movies were.
+adam jensen If you are referring to Eps 1-3, agreed. If you are referring to Eps 4-6, while certainly not flawless, I think they have some decent themes and charm.
+Oscar De Santiago It's certainly a matter of taste, and a balancing act at that. Jar Jar, to my taste, was far too broadly slapstick, and too plot-altering in his idiocy.
(Leaving aside questions raised about whether he, and the Gungans as a whole, are sort of racist.)
What's so bad about Jar Jar?
I'm just glad star trek is safe wars on the other hand it was fucked since episode one
Wow! Like the "1st" 3 movies were all that great. George really jumpped the shark on those. The only place Disney can go is up from there.
+Oscar De Santiago He is, at the very least, a dolt, and played for stupid comic relief. Which is not a relief.
+zach vander berg While not thinking it's the greatest thing since sliced flarn, I think Abrams' ST reboot has been suitably entertaining, at least as much as most of the TOS or TNG movies were.
+adam jensen If you are referring to Eps 1-3, agreed. If you are referring to Eps 4-6, while certainly not flawless, I think they have some decent themes and charm.
+Dave Hill Every movie needs comic relief, unless they're something completely serious or drastic, such as documentaries.
+Oscar De Santiago It's certainly a matter of taste, and a balancing act at that. Jar Jar, to my taste, was far too broadly slapstick, and too plot-altering in his idiocy.
(Leaving aside questions raised about whether he, and the Gungans as a whole, are sort of racist.)