https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Making over the credit card tech landscape, one painful inch at a time

While the rest of the world has long been on a Chip-and-PIN credit card system — much more effective at preventing fraud than magstripes and signatures — the US has had be drawn kicking and screaming to it.

Today is supposedly the deadline day for US retailers to accept new chip-based credit cards or else face liability for credit card fraud — but card manufacturers have been slow in distributing them, retailers have had problems getting the equipment (or even learning they need to), and the whole effort is looking exceedingly half-assed.

And even once chips are accepted, retailers will still be using signatures because the American public cannot reliably remember 4-digit numbers (except for debit cards, oddly enough, and ATM cards, and a dozen different others).

We'll see how it goes.




Today, all stores in the US should accept chip-and-PIN cards. Yeah, right.
Liability shift is beginning of a very protracted end for magnetic stripe cards.

View on Google+

83 view(s)  

4 thoughts on “Making over the credit card tech landscape, one painful inch at a time”

  1. The major downside of electronic transfer is you don't see your money leaving. Before accepting your PIN, the law should require an animation of $20 bills being burned once per second to the total of your purchase.

  2. Added interesting note from the article: I'd had the impression that the US was generally going to stick with signatures, vs the (much more secure) PINs. The article implies that PINs are still in the plans, which is a good thing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *