https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Our Remarkably Low Expectations for the US Congress

It says something about the dysfunction in Washington, DC (largely the fault of the Republicans, in my opinion, but I digress) that it's actual headline news when they manage to pass a budget to keep the government from shutting down.

(It also says something when news that federal funding to fight the Zika virus has been secured isn't presented as a "Hey, look, we're fighting back against this scourge" as much as "Hey, look, Congress finally got around to doing something about it.")




Congress passes bill to avoid government shutdown
Congress cleared a bill Wednesday to fund the government and the federal response to Zika, avoiding a potentially embarrassing government shutdown just weeks before the election.

View on Google+

66 view(s)  

5 thoughts on “Our Remarkably Low Expectations for the US Congress”

  1. +Marty S. Apparently a combination of wanting to get done and go home to campaign, and nobody wanting to take credit right now for shutting down the government, actually got something done. I'm trying to figure out how to use those incentives on a regular basis.

  2. +Gary Roth God, no.

    Hmmm. Though …

    … what if House members still served 2-year terms, but it was staggered, with 18-19 seats (randomly spread across the country) facing election each month?

    There would always be a sizeable contingent concerned over how actions were going to impact them. There wouldn't need to be overly-long campaigning seasons every other year. Changes in the opinions and mood of the overall electorate would be reflected more subtly but more quickly. There would be no radical shifts of "the New Freshman Class of Young Turks."

    (Similarly, re-elect 4 Senate seats each month.)

    There would be some disadvantages, too — potentially more frequent shifts in control and overhead cost of spreading out the churn of employees. But I can see it as an idea, when I found my next country.

Leave a Reply to Dave Hill Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *