https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Tweetizen Trump – 2017-08-16: “Truly Bad People”

I was feeling a bit down yesterday, Donald. It just seemed like the same ol’ same ol’, and one can only batter one’s head against the Twitter for so long until a headache ensues.

Today I’m feeling a bit more vigorous, so we’re going to dive back in to see what’s going on in that head of yours. I’m sure it will be an exciting journey.

[Being a look at the @RealDonaldTrump Twitter account, with a glance at the @POTUS account, grouped for your topical pleasure.]

Charlottesville

Wow, Donald. So much to unpack there.

  1. Made additional remarks a couple of days later, after staying silent on the violence in Charlottesville until someone was killed (and many injured) by a Nazi sympathizer, and, even then only condemning “many sides” for the violence going on.
  2. The “additional remarks” were apparently calling out the KKK, Neo-Nazis, and white supremacists who marched on Charlottesville in the first place, and who are … well, they’re freaking KKK, Neo-Nazis, and white supremacists, so calling them out shouldn’t be a huge stretch for you, Donald, and you shouldn’t be surprised when people comment about your not doing so for two days.
  3. And after delaying days about doing so, then you get pissy that people are still being critical of you?
  4. And, while we’re talking about KKK, Neo-Nazis, and white supremacists, you have the balls to say that the media are “truly bad people”?

The only thing that would make this any zanier is if you walked back your additional remarks and tried to once again assert a moral equivalence between the KKK, Neo-Nazis, and white supremacists who came to Charlottesville to protest and the anti-racist, anti-fascist people who counter-protested.

Oh, wait.

You also retweeted a guy on the Advisory Board for your presidential campaign:

 

That’s true. Because you didn’t. Or, rather, when you did (finally) address the matter, you did so in a “well, many sides are to blame, many sides” kind of way.

Nazis, Donald.

Big Business

Just as a reminder, when last we left you had just attacked Ken Frazier, CEO of Merck, who had announced he was dropping out of your Manufacturing Council over your tepid response to the Charlottesville events.

Later that afternoon, you attacked him again. Because, hey, that’s kind of got to piss you off, Donald.

So this is as after the CEO of Intel dropped out of the Manufacturing Council, too, over your tepid response to the Charlottesville events.

Though I do have to be amused about you railing over “grandstanders,” Donald.

Um … as has been noted many times, Donald, Amazon is now collecting and paying sales tax in all states that have it, and has been for months. I mean, I realize you have a beef with Jeff Bezos, who also owns the Washington Post, but you might even try to include a little accuracy in your accusations.

Korea

Retweeting Fox & Friends (!):

You do realize, Donald, that he’s not saying that it’s an actual game, right?

Apparently the DPRK has said that it isn’t going to (yet) “test” fire missles “near” Guam. And, honestly, Donald, that’s about as gracious of a tweet on the matter as I could have hoped for you, even if the “both catastrophic and unacceptable” construction is a little odd.

Alabama

Yeah, “exciting” is a word, Donald.

I continue to root for your choice of candidate here, Donald, if only because Strange is a run-of-the-mill conservative politician, and Roy Moore is a theocratic lunatic. But I could have wished that, in this case, your repeated endorsements of Strange had actually moved the needle some. Moore beat Strange in the primaries, 40-32%.

Potpourri

This was on your return to New York. It’s … not the most coherent statement you’ve ever made, esp. in context of people criticizing you for never spending time at White House and (allegedly) calling it a “dump”.

You know, Donald, it would be nice if you could decide on one story here. Are accusations about Russian interference baseless, could be anyone, not convinced? Did they happen, but to no effect? Is it all just a “witch hunt”? Or was it something very real, something that the _previous_ Administration (certainly not yours) should have done something about.

Pick one, Donald, not “all of the above.”

The report you cite is an interesting one, Donald — not nearly as clear-cut as you assert in your tweet, but it does indicate, with 20-20 hindsight, that the signs of Russian plans to interfere with elections in Europe and the US were there, and State and the White House both resisted some intelligence recommendations for diplomatic counter-measures.

And, of course, it comes out of the right-of-center Politico, and it’s chock-fill of unnamed sources (which you’re always railing against, right, Donald?). And, of course, you understand completely about not letting intelligence agencies dictate what you choose to do internationally, right, Donald?

Also, it would be nice to hear what your Administration is doing about all of this for _future_ elections (aside from standing by while the GOP dismantle federal assistance to help secure the election process).

Retweeting Fox & Friends (!):

Because of course you are. I mean, it lets you reward someone you like, piss off more Latinos (who don’t like you anyway), and poke a thumb in the eye of the judiciary (whom yo dislike, too).

Also, isn’t it weird that you’re retweeting Fox & Friends talking about something you are going to do? As opposed to simply telling us straight out? It’s almost like someone else is doing some of this tweeting for you.

Retweeting Fox News:

Yeah, a real shame the GOP stopped us from spending any money on it twenty, thirty years ago.

But your answer seems to be, “Hey, too many permits are required,” and some of those permits and reviews had to do with considering flooding related to (gasp) climate change. And why worry about that?

Remember the Alamo! 54-40 or Fight! Tastes good like a cigarette should!

I mean, if you can randomly throw out slogans, why can’t everyone play?

Other

You or your Social Media Minion also tweeted under your name about …

… being back in Washington DC for “great trade deals”
… going to New York City for “trade” and military purchases.
… retweeting someone complementing you.
… retweeting someone complaining that the national media is not covering gun violence in Chicago.
… retweeting the VP about Argentina (three times)
… congratulating the guy who won the GOP nomination to replace Jason Chaffetz
… retweeting Jesse Watters (a Fox News flack whom you keep retweeting) thanking a fan who was congraulating him on his cable news ratings (!).
… retweeting the House Majority Leader supporting your infrastructure initiative

 

212 view(s)  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *