https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

On guns and responsibility

Jim Wright, once again, nails the matter on the head. If you own a device designed to kill, then you are responsible for making sure that doesn’t happen. (Heck, we have a legal framework of responsibility at that level for devices we own that aren’t designed to kill.)

That’s not a final, ultimate solution for gun violence, but, as Wright points out, drunk driving laws aren’t a final, ultimate solution for DUI fatalities — but nobody suggests that they are useless or should be abolished.




Bang Bang Crazy, Part 14: The Cowardice of Responsibility

View on Google+

31 view(s)  

2 thoughts on “On guns and responsibility”

  1. I think liability insurance would straighten things out about 90% right there. I'm pretty sure the guy who gave his son back his guns and then the kid went and shot up a Waffle House would have thought twice about it if he knew that doing that would triple his insurance premiums….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *