https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

“What has she gots in her pocketses?”

Answer? Not much. Because women’s pockets (esp. front pockets) suck. When they even exist.

[h/t +Margie Kleerup]




Women’s Pockets are Inferior.
If you wear women’s clothes, you already know this. But now we’ve got the data to show it.

Original Post

46 view(s)  

12 thoughts on ““What has she gots in her pocketses?””

  1. I've seen this time and again with female family and friends. I get frustrated enough when men's sports coats and other overwear have faux pockets — things too small to use, or just a patch of fabric sewn on closed, not an actual pocket. Having that be true for regular daily clothing must be maddening.

  2. I was talking with my wife about this the other day. I suggested that women should protest by deliberately not buying pants that didn't have functional pockets. She said despite their complaints, most women wouldn't participate in such a protest because they don't consider pockets more important than price or style.

  3. +Keith Wilson There's some truth to the idea that this problem is perpetuated in part by the people being hurt by it. And that's because "form over function" has been inculcated on women (and on men regarding women) by the fashion (and pharma and cosmetic and every other) industry for many, many years (note the Dior quote in the story, “Men have pockets to keep things in, women for decoration.”)

  4. She can't fit all those things from her purse in her pockets anyhow. And pants might be so tight that usable pockets…. would not be . Definitely form [fashion] over function. But hey. She's got another excuse to have another bag, right?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *