https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Should the Left be happy about the GOP civil war? Or terrified?

Steve Bannon is making an active move on the establishment GOP in Washington — who are finally actively counter-moving against him. This is a weirdly volatile dynamic.

1. More moderate and establishment GOP (themselves no great band of heroes) wanting to defeat the neo-fascist wing of the party should be encouraged by all sides. The election of Trump in 2016 demonstrates that playing the odds that a Bizarro World extremist could never, ever, possibly be elected is a mook’s game. Gambling that a Bannon lackey couldn’t possibly win the general election even if they won the GOP primary seems similarly over-optimistic.

2. The establishment GOP is already weakened — it’s difficult to tell the extent to which their power has been electorally hollowed out, and the extent to which they still have some measure of influence on the electorate and the results of the 2018 elections.

3. The “concern” that the establishment GOP has over the anti-establishment populist rebellion against them is very much to to be laughed at (if the stakes were not so frighteningly high). This is an anti-establishment, anti-government, anti-Washington movement that the GOP has both passively and actively supported in the Reaganite 80s, the Gingrich 90s, the Dubya 00s, and the TEAbagging 10s. Disdain for the federal government (and, by extension, its swampy politicians), distrust of the media (even the Fox contingent), despising of compromise, arrogance toward numbers and data and science — these are all things that the GOP has fostered for thirty years. And only now are concerned that the Revolution, like Saturn, will consume its own children.

4. The attempt to tar Bannon as a racist and part of the neo-fascist wing of the alt-Right is ballsy, but unlikely to be effective within the party itself. Too many of the GOP’s base have been trained by the GOP itself to consider all blacks as welfare queens and thugs, Jews as liberal coastal elites and moneyed interests, and all the other targets of the Nazi types infesting the walls of the Republican party as traitors against True America. The GOP establishment’s assumption that they can pivot their base against such sentiment is chutzpah of the highest caliber.

5. Donald Trump is deeply unpopular. You know who’s even more unpopular, at least among the GOP faithful? Mitch McConnell. And Paul Ryan isn’t much better. Trying to defeat Steve Bannon isn’t easy, and neither McConnell nor Ryan have the popular support to stop the Monster from the Id they, themselves, have unleashed. Attempts to do so, especially ones using the arguments the Dems have already put forward, are going to be very difficult to pull off.

6. And, for that matter, Trump doesn’t have the popularity to do so, either. The raw meat base love Trump for his rhetoric, and are willing to send to the political guillotine anyone who opposed him — but are apparently well aware that, rhetorically, he’s unreliable and petty. They love that he’s in the White House, but they’re more than happy (see Luther Strange) to ignore him as they see fit. He’s the John Gill of leaders, an ideological figurehead that they’re happy to scream for at rallies, but are also willing to ignore in favor of more malign figureheads like Bannon when ideological consistency becomes important.

7. The one hope here is that a Bannon candidate, wounded but not stopped by the establishment GOP, will be a targetable victim for the Dems (assuming that it’s in a district or race that the Dems are actually bothering to challenge). The concern here is whether the the establishment GOP will consider a win by the Dems as better for the country than a win by the Bannonites.

They should — the Dems are not likely to destroy the country, and will not be competing in the future against the same population as the Bannon wing. Establishment Republicans playing the long game will enlist or at least support Democratic opposition to Bannon’s rebels; hack Republicans will pay more attention to party labels and threats of retaliation that they think they can avoid by appeasement.

8. The wild card here is which way Trump will jump. Will he rally to the defense of Bannon, his once-trusted advisor, or will he consider him a threat to his own power? Will he draw closer to the swampy GOP establishment? Or will he simply consider himself more important and durable than either faction, and seek to rise above it all?

It would all be fascinating to watch unfold, were the very future of our nation not hanging in the balance.




washingtonpost

View on Google+

Yes, this is just what Colorado needs in its political future

A Steve Bannon-backed Tom Tancredo GOP candidacy for governor.

Part of me wants to see it happen because I think that not in a million years could Tancredo (my [sigh] former US Representative, two-time failed gubernatorial candidate, and a guy who’s managed to alienate both the state’s Dems and the state’s GOP) possibly win.

On he other hand, I thought the same thing about Donald Trump.




Steve Bannon met with Tom Tancredo about a possible run for Colorado governor, Tancredo says
Tom Tancredo said Thursday that he sat down with former White House strategist Stephen Bannon and hinted that the two hard-right agitators discussed the possibility of Tancredo running for Colorado…

View on Google+

The GOP is facing a donor rebellion

I’d like to think that at least some donor rebellion — especially at the grass roots — is from more general buffoonery from the Congressional GOP and the President, but evidently, at least from the big donors, it’s because Congress has managed to do largely bupkis in terms of doing anything to further the Republican cause other than canceling a bunch of Obama regulations and approving a bunch of Trump nominees.

So, yeah, if I were a big-money GOP contributor, I’d be kind of torqued that they’ve managed to fritter away several months rather than robbing poor people of health care, giving the monetary savings to corporations and wealthy donors like me, and generally rolling back all change since the Gilded Age.

Oh, and look, it’s Corey Gardner, my (sigh) junior Senator, running the GOP’s mid-term reelection effort. Well, he doesn’t have to worry — he’s not up for reelection until 2020. Just like Trump.




Behind New Obamacare Repeal Vote: ‘Furious’ G.O.P. Donors – The New York Times
Donations to the party are down, and Senator Cory Gardner warned his colleagues that they have to show some results.

View on Google+

Reform through Willful Ignorance

Senators Graham and Cassidy …. and the GOP leadership in the Senate (and the House) … and pretty much everyone else … have no definitive, accepted standard as to what the Graham-Cassidy bill to gack the ACA and kneecap Medicaid will actually do.

This is legislation with a profound impact on the US — 1/6 of our economy flows through the health care system, and health insurance reform impacts every single citizen of the United States, especially the poor, the disabled, the ill, and the elderly.

And the GOP don’t really know what their legislation will do. Well, they’ve been told by numerous outside sources that it will be a disaster, about the tens of millions who will lose insurance coverage, about how senior citizen premiums will go up $16K/year on average, on the long-term impacts to the poor, the sick, children, the disabled. But the gold standard, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, will not have its full analysis of the bill — its cost, the number of people who will lose insurance, etc — for several weeks.

They can’t wait that long. They won’t wait that long. They only have a few days before the end of the month, when suddenly they can’t pass this thing with just 50 votes. And they don’t really care anyway. Because this isn’t about health care, or insurance, or the economy, or helping people not die. It’s about one thing only:

“You know, I could maybe give you 10 reasons why this bill shouldn’t be considered,” said Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa. “But Republicans campaigned on this so often that you have a responsibility to carry out what you said in the campaign. That’s pretty much as much of a reason as the substance of the bill.”

They said they would do it. They promised. They had no idea what they were promising, and when they finally tackled it they resembled the dog that finally got hold of the car, but, by God, they promised they would do something so this is the one something they are going to try to do.

No matter the cost. No matter the lives impacted. No matter the pain, and suffering, and debt, and death.

Because they’re afraid of what will happen to them in 2018 if they don’t.

And that’s how these people are governing the United States.

I am beyond disgusted.

——

Side note: Grassley also basically admitted that this effort isn’t even about fixing the problems they say they are going to fix.

But Grassley also acknowledged that Graham-Cassidy would not affect the most pressing Obamacare shortcoming facing Iowa: rising premiums and limited choices on the state’s individual health insurance market. Instead, he said, that’ll have to be addressed first with a “stop-gap” plan now under consideration and ultimately with a separate legislation.

“What you want to do long-term is going to be done in the Alexander bill,” Grassley said, referring to a bipartisan bill to stabilize individual premiums nationwide that reportedly fell apart this week.

Fell apart because the GOP leadership said they would never allow it to come to the floor, because it was more important to pass this bill to gut Medicaid for the long haul, but call it “Obamacare Repeal” because that’s what they need to say, politically.




Republicans Have a Bill to Repeal Obamacare. They Don’t Know Exactly What It Will Do
Congress’ own scorekeeper won’t weigh in before a vote is held

View on Google+

Tweetizen Trump – 2017-08-27: “Hurricane (and other stuff)!”

So this is going to be a lot shorter installment of this series than usual, even with the huge number of tweets you’ve been generating. Most of them, since Friday, have been about Hurricane Harvey (21 that I counted, with 12 more, some of them retweets, over on @POTUS), about which I can only say:

1. You are clearly bound and determined not to appear hands-off in the face of this disaster, especially given the huge gaps in appointees nominated for FEMA, etc. It’s good to see Dubya’s lesson still remains in place.

2. An actual post mortem of your efforts, and the work of the Federal Government, in dealing with the hurricane will come by and by. No use anticipating that analysis.

But in between the copious hurricane tweets the past few days, you and/or your Social Media Minion slipped in a few nuggets of other business, both profound and mundane. Let’s take a look at those, Donald.

Unless you’re Hispanic, in which case he kept Arizona (excuse me, his county in Arizona) miserable by his department’s racist antics — antics which landed him with a conviction in the first place.

Oh, he also kept Arizona Maricopa County poorer from the $140M paid to litigate and settle brutality claims against his deputies between ’93 and ’15, and made Arizona a scandal when it comes to law enforcement and penal policy.

He is a loathsome individual, Donald. But, hey, he was your loyal campaign buddy and your partner in Birtherism, and pardoning him lets you appeal to your base, insult both Hispanics and the judicial system, and gives a broad wink to your friends embroiled in the Russia scandal investigations that they needn’t worry about doing any time, either.

I won’t go on, because I’ve discussed it (and been disgusted by it) at length elsewhere.

The only other comment I’ll make is that it was a remarkable thing to announce at 8pm on a Friday night while everyone was focused on a major disaster.

I would call this the nadir of your presidency thus far, but you continue to surprise me, Donald, at how low you can go. Oh, well. It’s not like you have a posse of awful sheriffs to show your love for …

… which connected to a link from Sheriff David Clarke of Milwaukee about his brand new book. Clarke is the right-wing, anti-immigrant, prisonerkilling, plagiarizing, medalfestooned, wannabe-DHS honcho who would probably get along beautifully with Joe Arpaio.

Why you’re giving a book review (putting aside doubts that you’ve actually read the book) in the middle of a natural disaster is beyond me, Donald.

After more hurricane coverage, then noting you would visit Texas once a trip wouldn’t disrupt recovery efforts there (a perfectly legit argument that Obama made as well under similar circumstances), you added …

Because let’s both brag about 2016 (again) and talk about campaigning for the 2018 election in the middle of that big disaster, right? (Those cryptic references, for those without a program, are “C.M.” for Claire McCaskill and “S” for Senate.)

After another tweet about the hurricane, which maybe brought Texas’ southern neighbor to mind, you added …

Yes, just what those people in Texas are worried about right now, Donald.

You are correct that Mexico has a lot of crime problems. That “THE WALL” is a necessary solution to that remains unclear, and that you’ll find a way to get Mexico to eventually pay for it even more so.

Speaking of which, are you still threatening to shut down the federal government if you don’t get your money for “THE WALL”? [11] Is that the flooded beach you’re going willing to die on, Donald?

And since “THE WALL” reminded you of that other Mexico thing, you then went on …

I’m shocked, shocked that Mexico and Canada are not rolling over for you on NAFTA.

Of course, how you plan on just “terminating” the agreement without throwing a wrench into the $267B in exports we sell to Canada, or the $231B we sell in exports to Mexico remains to be seen. And how importing less from those countries (in favor of, presumably, American manufactures that are, presumably, more expensive) won’t raise prices for consumers similarly remains a mystery.

At that point you returned to more hurricane tweets. Because you’ve got your priorities. 

View on Google+

Tweetizen Trump – 2017-08-11: “Locked and Loaded”

[Being a look at the @RealDonaldTrump Twitter account, with a glance at the @POTUS account, grouped for your topical pleasure.]

Friday? Already? How the time flies, Donald, when you’re wondering if missiles will be …

What’s crawled out of the Twitter Stream from the Id today, Donald?

The Senate!

How are things going up on Capitol Hill, Donald? Are you vigorously working with the leadership and rank-and-file of GOP lawmakers to craft a plan that will fulfill your campaign promises and Make America Great Again?

Ah. Still winning friend and influencing people in the US Senate, Donald. You do realize that Sen. McConnell is pretty essential to the passage of anything that you want to brag about. Most people would be encouraging, supportive, collaborative, all that. And, in a vacuum, that tweet might have applied … except this isn’t a vacuum, and coupled with your tweets about McConnell earlier this week, make it clear this is marching orders / cajoling, not cheering from the sidelines.

Apparently you’ve decided McConnell threw you under the bus with his “excessive expectations” comment the other day, so he’s fair game to be thrown under the bus first. That’s a real leadership lesson, Donald.

Then you retweeted a couple of Fox & Friends (of course) articles:

The story talks about how Dean Heller, Jeff Flake, and, yes, Mitch McConnell are facing the potential (or even the reality) of well-funded primary threats back home.

(Also, does that really strike anyone as a particularly “fair” or “balanced” headline? I mean, really? C’mon, Donald, it sounds like you wrote it.)

And another Fox & Friends (of course!) retweet.

The weird thing here is, Donald, this sort of thing is clearly just playing to your audience. I mean, McConnell knows what you said. He even knows about this Fox article. Your calling it out isn’t a message to him, it’s a message to your Trumpists to start calling for McConnell’s resignation (or at least his compliance with your demands). It’s … an interesting choice of tactics, Donald, but it’s completely your style.

International Brouhaha!

Since we all need a reminder about US military might, etc., you retweeted:

Again, isn’t it interesting that you’re posting a news story from Fox & Friends (of course!), rather than a Pentagon statement. (More, less breathless, coverage of the attack here.)

But, of course, what everyone’s concerned about is North Korea. Are you going to reassure us that we remain safe? Or promise that if we’re attacked, we’ll slap ’em down? No surprise there:

I’ll bet you’ve always wanted to say “locked and loaded,” Donald. It sounds very tough and military!

It does call to mind the question of what you consider “act unwisely” to mean, Donald. I mean, it gives you lots of wiggle room to pick and choose, but I do have to wonder about what the DPRK would actually have to do in order to draw a US military strike. I’m sure they are wondering that, too. So are the millions of people in South Korea (including 300K Americans).

Hopefully we’ll all find another path other than acting “unwisely.”

You retweeted:

[Retweeted on @POTUS]

Very impressive. Nothing that the North Koreans don’t already know about, of course, but I’m sure it makes your audience all tingly.

Potpourri!

[Retweeted on @POTUS, because it’s sooooo Presidential.]

Isn’t your Administration a little bit new to be called a “comeback kid,” Donald, even by a fawningly conservative newspaper?

The survey is one from Zogby, and their overall analysis doesn’t sound that encouraging (emphasis mine):

The president’s approval rating has rebounded somewhat since our July poll. Following a series of disastrous weeks, Trump’s approval numbers have moved up slightly, especially among his base and a few other sub-groups not known for their support of the president

Zogby, which tends to have mediocre accuracy scores, shows your overall approval at 45% vs 51% disapproval. As bad as that sounds, it remains an outlier. Even your previously favorite polling shop, Rasmussen, isn’t quite that optimistic, showing 45% vs 53%, though they’ve shown an overall rise in the last week. 538’s aggregate score is at 37%-57%, but, yes, trending in your favor.

Of course, as your many-multi-million dollar missile lobbing at Syria demonstrated, being tough and military is always good for a few ticks of support increase. Muscle flexing is popular, reflexively, as is rallying behind a military threat.

As long as you don’t go too far, Donald.

You or your Social Media Minions also tweeted about …

  • Ivanka leading a US delegation this fall to India to discuss women’s entrepreneurship.
  • A couple of tweets talking about VA Secretary Shulkin.