Previous post: Will Hill Fill the Bill with Bill?
Next post: Diet Update
| HowManyOfMe.com | ||
|
That’s using “David.” Add in another 149 that have “Dave” as the given name. Hmmmm … no wonder my International Man of Mystery status is so pervasive (if you leave my middle name out).
Ostensibly this is based on US Census data (1990). I’ve seen some folks be less than sanguine about the quality of the results, at any rate.
(via Doyce)
    |  |
Previous post: Will Hill Fill the Bill with Bill?
Next post: Diet Update
Blog of Heroes (post) Blog of Heroes (comments) WIST Doing Write
The views expressed by me on this weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer, my church, my party, my candidate, my community, my wife, my friends, or, on occasion, myself.
Views expressed by others are, well, theirs. I reserve the right to delete them, but it's usually better to let the marketplace of ideas hold sway, even if some packages are long past their expiry date.
Stuff I link to? Sometimes it's because I agree with it. Sometimes because I disagree with it, but want to point (mockingly, in some cases) to my sources regardless; I have a liberal arts background; I believe in citations. And linking to stuff is what the Internet is about.
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
I am one of only nine.
Now to find the other eight and eliminate them…
Zero.
Using both Dave and David, there are just 1308 folks who share my name. I looked up “John Smith” just for fun, and there are 49535 people who share that name. That’s about 1% of the people who took that census.
Now that I look into the web page more carefully, it says that these are “just estimates” and that if they return zero for your name, it just means that you’re among the 19% of the people whose names are so uncommon that they won’t show up in the estimate. I guess this means the way to interpret the numbers is as a measure of the popularity of a name rather than as indicating the exact number of people who share that name.