https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Planned obsolescence

The new XHTML standards from W3C indicate that, over time, backwards compatability to HTML from browsers will not be required. In other words, all those old web pages you have,…

The new XHTML standards from W3C indicate that, over time, backwards compatability to HTML from browsers will not be required.

In other words, all those old web pages you have, or that Google has cached, or that are backed up somewhere? They have more to worry about than bit rot. It’s Sanskrit time, baby. Untranslatable, unreadable.

On the one hand, I can understand W3C wanting to go with tighter, better specs for web page presentation, especially given all the whacked-out things that people want their web pages to do these days (as opposed to, say, just presenting text).

Still, it sure sounds a tad goofy to not just deprecate, but actually obsolete a lot of existing material. The Web seems, paradoxically, like it should be more permanent than that. And while I’m sure there will be some conversion utilities, or some browsers will have add-ons to do ad hoc translation, it’s still … annoying.

23 view(s)  

2 thoughts on “Planned obsolescence”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *